That system was refined by a guy named FRANK I think,,, over at the RX,, anyway, what he used as a screener was Play the biggest fav on the board (no runline) bet it progressively for 3 games (dam big I know) ONly bet the games where VegasInsider showed a value of 50 cents or more,,, this system went 3 years to a 100% win % documented over at the rx, and he said he used it a few years prior to posting it,,
As you would Imagine, Choking on the CHALK it was a system that was scoffed at everyday, lol, so I think he stopped posting it for that reason, Just too much negative feedback, lol, even thoguh he was winning,, Youll have to go research the title or ask over there to confirm the EXACT rules,,
anyway, good luck to you with the Runline system,, tater
0
That system was refined by a guy named FRANK I think,,, over at the RX,, anyway, what he used as a screener was Play the biggest fav on the board (no runline) bet it progressively for 3 games (dam big I know) ONly bet the games where VegasInsider showed a value of 50 cents or more,,, this system went 3 years to a 100% win % documented over at the rx, and he said he used it a few years prior to posting it,,
As you would Imagine, Choking on the CHALK it was a system that was scoffed at everyday, lol, so I think he stopped posting it for that reason, Just too much negative feedback, lol, even thoguh he was winning,, Youll have to go research the title or ask over there to confirm the EXACT rules,,
anyway, good luck to you with the Runline system,, tater
Never lost 3 games in a row? I know for a fact that it lost 3 times in a row in 2008 on four different occasions. However, it never went beyond that. I wouldn't chase it because you could be putting up a few thousand dollar just to win a hundred dollars. I would use a different wagering strategy.
Some idea's I had was on the basis that this particular method does hit 70% which basically means it will hit 2 games in a row consecutively. So, bet the same amount after a loss until you win. Then after a win then increase to win the losses. So, when you win 2 times in a row you win. This would be a more conservative alternate to the double up method. Again, this is based on the fact that it will hit 70% of the time so, more often than not it will hit on consecutive days.
Another thing was if you parlay it with a total bet, it will bring it to an even money bet.
0
Never lost 3 games in a row? I know for a fact that it lost 3 times in a row in 2008 on four different occasions. However, it never went beyond that. I wouldn't chase it because you could be putting up a few thousand dollar just to win a hundred dollars. I would use a different wagering strategy.
Some idea's I had was on the basis that this particular method does hit 70% which basically means it will hit 2 games in a row consecutively. So, bet the same amount after a loss until you win. Then after a win then increase to win the losses. So, when you win 2 times in a row you win. This would be a more conservative alternate to the double up method. Again, this is based on the fact that it will hit 70% of the time so, more often than not it will hit on consecutive days.
Another thing was if you parlay it with a total bet, it will bring it to an even money bet.
Never lost 3 games in a row? I know for a fact that it lost 3 times in a row in 2008 on four different occasions. However, it never went beyond that. I wouldn't chase it because you could be putting up a few thousand dollar just to win a hundred dollars. I would use a different wagering strategy.
Some idea's I had was on the basis that this particular method does hit 70% which basically means it will hit 2 games in a row consecutively. So, bet the same amount after a loss until you win. Then after a win then increase to win the losses. So, when you win 2 times in a row you win. This would be a more conservative alternate to the double up method. Again, this is based on the fact that it will hit 70% of the time so, more often than not it will hit on consecutive days.
Another thing was if you parlay it with a total bet, it will bring it to an even money bet.
Can you post a few plays to see how it works out?
0
Quote Originally Posted by racinivan:
Never lost 3 games in a row? I know for a fact that it lost 3 times in a row in 2008 on four different occasions. However, it never went beyond that. I wouldn't chase it because you could be putting up a few thousand dollar just to win a hundred dollars. I would use a different wagering strategy.
Some idea's I had was on the basis that this particular method does hit 70% which basically means it will hit 2 games in a row consecutively. So, bet the same amount after a loss until you win. Then after a win then increase to win the losses. So, when you win 2 times in a row you win. This would be a more conservative alternate to the double up method. Again, this is based on the fact that it will hit 70% of the time so, more often than not it will hit on consecutive days.
Another thing was if you parlay it with a total bet, it will bring it to an even money bet.
Never lost 3 games in a row? I know for a fact that it lost 3 times in a row in 2008 on four different occasions. However, it never went beyond that. I wouldn't chase it because you could be putting up a few thousand dollar just to win a hundred dollars. I would use a different wagering strategy.
Some idea's I had was on the basis that this particular method does hit 70% which basically means it will hit 2 games in a row consecutively. So, bet the same amount after a loss until you win. Then after a win then increase to win the losses. So, when you win 2 times in a row you win. This would be a more conservative alternate to the double up method. Again, this is based on the fact that it will hit 70% of the time so, more often than not it will hit on consecutive days.
Another thing was if you parlay it with a total bet, it will bring it to an even money bet.
see I didnt see that, I stopped reading his threads in 2007, but that is why I suggested to go and relook up the threads lol,, I didnt know for sure,,
good luck tater
0
Quote Originally Posted by racinivan:
Never lost 3 games in a row? I know for a fact that it lost 3 times in a row in 2008 on four different occasions. However, it never went beyond that. I wouldn't chase it because you could be putting up a few thousand dollar just to win a hundred dollars. I would use a different wagering strategy.
Some idea's I had was on the basis that this particular method does hit 70% which basically means it will hit 2 games in a row consecutively. So, bet the same amount after a loss until you win. Then after a win then increase to win the losses. So, when you win 2 times in a row you win. This would be a more conservative alternate to the double up method. Again, this is based on the fact that it will hit 70% of the time so, more often than not it will hit on consecutive days.
Another thing was if you parlay it with a total bet, it will bring it to an even money bet.
see I didnt see that, I stopped reading his threads in 2007, but that is why I suggested to go and relook up the threads lol,, I didnt know for sure,,
I appologise for sounding a bit distasteful. I don't mean to come off on the wrong foot. However, it is a good point, but with a better staking strategy it can work.
0
Tate,
I appologise for sounding a bit distasteful. I don't mean to come off on the wrong foot. However, it is a good point, but with a better staking strategy it can work.
I give up. I am reviewing the last three seasons and don't see anything close to an 8 or 9 game losing streak. Since you've already done the research, can you point out the date in particular because maybe I've overlooked something here.
0
Okay Josh,
I give up. I am reviewing the last three seasons and don't see anything close to an 8 or 9 game losing streak. Since you've already done the research, can you point out the date in particular because maybe I've overlooked something here.
I would think that if you took biggest favorite on run line from the national league and american league and parlay them chances are pretty good you probably win. I checked too and didn't see any major flucuations like josh is talking about. can you point them out too us.
0
I would think that if you took biggest favorite on run line from the national league and american league and parlay them chances are pretty good you probably win. I checked too and didn't see any major flucuations like josh is talking about. can you point them out too us.
System should be pretty much self-explanatory. Hasn't been easy to post these over the last few days before the games, however, since you all know the rules, finding the plays should be easy.
Today, Boston makes the system 7-0.
Should be back on schedule tomorrow with posting, however, just wanted to post this so that newbies and anyone following can see the system record.
0
System should be pretty much self-explanatory. Hasn't been easy to post these over the last few days before the games, however, since you all know the rules, finding the plays should be easy.
Today, Boston makes the system 7-0.
Should be back on schedule tomorrow with posting, however, just wanted to post this so that newbies and anyone following can see the system record.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.