And 4-2 is nothing from a statistic point of view, but I'd like to give it a try and keep records of my trials on this topic.
When I'll be going 687 - 313 some people might consider wagering.
And 4-2 is nothing from a statistic point of view, but I'd like to give it a try and keep records of my trials on this topic.
When I'll be going 687 - 313 some people might consider wagering.
And 4-2 is nothing from a statistic point of view, but I'd like to give it a try and keep records of my trials on this topic.
When I'll be going 687 - 313 some people might consider wagering.
Right on Wild Card ... here is a relavent clip ...
"Roulette balls and dice simply have no memory. Every spin in roulette and every toss in craps is independent of all past events. In the short run you can fool yourself into thinking a betting system works, by risking a lot to win a little. However, in the long run no betting system can withstand the test of time."
Right on Wild Card ... here is a relavent clip ...
"Roulette balls and dice simply have no memory. Every spin in roulette and every toss in craps is independent of all past events. In the short run you can fool yourself into thinking a betting system works, by risking a lot to win a little. However, in the long run no betting system can withstand the test of time."
Boston team total ODD
Atlanta team total EVEN
Toronto team total ODD
Detroit team total EVEN
Chicago team total ODD
Golden State team total EVEN
BOS @ DAL game total ODD
UTA @ DEN game total EVEN
LAC @ GSW game total EVEN
So far 6 - 7 (46.15%)
Boston team total ODD
Atlanta team total EVEN
Toronto team total ODD
Detroit team total EVEN
Chicago team total ODD
Golden State team total EVEN
BOS @ DAL game total ODD
UTA @ DEN game total EVEN
LAC @ GSW game total EVEN
So far 6 - 7 (46.15%)
Hey Josh ... Do you have a degree in Physics ... ? Well I do, and I have a very strong matematical background as well. Nothing I have posted on this thread is incorrect. I Googled "law of averages" and here is the top return.
"The law of averages is a lay term used to express a belief that outcomes of a random event shall "even out" within a small sample. As invoked in everyday life, the "law" usually reflects bad statistics or wishful thinking rather than any mathematical principle."
Since it has no mathematical principle, reflects bad statistics, and is nothing but wishful thinking I don't want any part of it. If Voodoo and hocus pocus are your bag then go ahead and continue to tell me I am wrong and to provide some more bogus answers. Anyone reading this that also has an analytical mind will agree ... "Numbers have memory" is as good a laugh as the guy who posted about using numerology to make his picks.
Red ... I do appreciate your mathematical knowledge and your attempt to apply it to sports betting. It is such a relief to see someone actually doing something that actually requires some thought and knowledge. All I am saying is I think you can find a better to place to apply your skills other then an even/odd bet.
BTW the odds of going 2-7 as you did tonight are 36 out of 512 or 0.0703, roughly 1 in 14 ... not 1 in a million or some other number you may come up with.
Hey Josh ... Do you have a degree in Physics ... ? Well I do, and I have a very strong matematical background as well. Nothing I have posted on this thread is incorrect. I Googled "law of averages" and here is the top return.
"The law of averages is a lay term used to express a belief that outcomes of a random event shall "even out" within a small sample. As invoked in everyday life, the "law" usually reflects bad statistics or wishful thinking rather than any mathematical principle."
Since it has no mathematical principle, reflects bad statistics, and is nothing but wishful thinking I don't want any part of it. If Voodoo and hocus pocus are your bag then go ahead and continue to tell me I am wrong and to provide some more bogus answers. Anyone reading this that also has an analytical mind will agree ... "Numbers have memory" is as good a laugh as the guy who posted about using numerology to make his picks.
Red ... I do appreciate your mathematical knowledge and your attempt to apply it to sports betting. It is such a relief to see someone actually doing something that actually requires some thought and knowledge. All I am saying is I think you can find a better to place to apply your skills other then an even/odd bet.
BTW the odds of going 2-7 as you did tonight are 36 out of 512 or 0.0703, roughly 1 in 14 ... not 1 in a million or some other number you may come up with.
Hey Josh ... Do you have a degree in Physics ... ? Well I do, and I have a very strong matematical background as well. Nothing I have posted on this thread is incorrect. I Googled "law of averages" and here is the top return.
"The law of averages is a lay term used to express a belief that outcomes of a random event shall "even out" within a small sample. As invoked in everyday life, the "law" usually reflects bad statistics or wishful thinking rather than any mathematical principle."
Since it has no mathematical principle, reflects bad statistics, and is nothing but wishful thinking I don't want any part of it. If Voodoo and hocus pocus are your bag then go ahead and continue to tell me I am wrong and to provide some more bogus answers. Anyone reading this that also has an analytical mind will agree ... "Numbers have memory" is as good a laugh as the guy who posted about using numerology to make his picks.
Red ... I do appreciate your mathematical knowledge and your attempt to apply it to sports betting. It is such a relief to see someone actually doing something that actually requires some thought and knowledge. All I am saying is I think you can find a better to place to apply your skills other then an even/odd bet.
BTW the odds of going 2-7 as you did tonight are 36 out of 512 or 0.0703, roughly 1 in 14 ... not 1 in a million or some other number you may come up with.
You're wright about the odds of going 2-7, but it also might be a situational record. 2-7 is as relevant as 2-0 or 4-2 so I will give it a try at least 100 times and if it doesn't reach 60-40 I'll throw it away.
Meanwhile be sure I'm digging out what to see what relevance does this theory have for betting wins / losses and overs / unders.
I would prefer too to have a system for betting on something that's not random and can be predicted. But for the beginning the easiest way to apply this theory seemed to be betting odd / even.
Hey Josh ... Do you have a degree in Physics ... ? Well I do, and I have a very strong matematical background as well. Nothing I have posted on this thread is incorrect. I Googled "law of averages" and here is the top return.
"The law of averages is a lay term used to express a belief that outcomes of a random event shall "even out" within a small sample. As invoked in everyday life, the "law" usually reflects bad statistics or wishful thinking rather than any mathematical principle."
Since it has no mathematical principle, reflects bad statistics, and is nothing but wishful thinking I don't want any part of it. If Voodoo and hocus pocus are your bag then go ahead and continue to tell me I am wrong and to provide some more bogus answers. Anyone reading this that also has an analytical mind will agree ... "Numbers have memory" is as good a laugh as the guy who posted about using numerology to make his picks.
Red ... I do appreciate your mathematical knowledge and your attempt to apply it to sports betting. It is such a relief to see someone actually doing something that actually requires some thought and knowledge. All I am saying is I think you can find a better to place to apply your skills other then an even/odd bet.
BTW the odds of going 2-7 as you did tonight are 36 out of 512 or 0.0703, roughly 1 in 14 ... not 1 in a million or some other number you may come up with.
You're wright about the odds of going 2-7, but it also might be a situational record. 2-7 is as relevant as 2-0 or 4-2 so I will give it a try at least 100 times and if it doesn't reach 60-40 I'll throw it away.
Meanwhile be sure I'm digging out what to see what relevance does this theory have for betting wins / losses and overs / unders.
I would prefer too to have a system for betting on something that's not random and can be predicted. But for the beginning the easiest way to apply this theory seemed to be betting odd / even.
If you take every game, the odd/even is absolutely random, but events that are independent and that have no memory tend to distribute themselves randomly in a series of trials.
The chances are for 50% for each game that the team scores odd or even points but the odd or even totals have the tendency to distribute randomly along a series. That means that is very unlikely that in a series of 20 consecutive trials to come out 20 consecutive odd or even, based on a random probability of 50%. Why don't you look back at some data to see how manny times you'll find 15 consecutive ODD points scored in 10000 games played? I guarantee you that you won't find more than 107 series.
That is the binomial distribution of successes and failures in series and that's not being teached in elementary school.
IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT ODD OR EVEN SCORES ARE DEPENDENT ON PAST EVENTS. THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY INDEPENDENT AND THAT IS WHY THAY TEND TO DISTRIBUTE RANDOMLY IN SERIES OF TRIALS.
And the chances of losing all 6 bets are based on the calculated probability of losing based on the binomial distribution of successses of failures and not based on the math book on elementary school.
And I am having fun and making money in the process. I am not forcing you to take my picks. Don't like it don't buy it, but keep your mouth shut.
And about the padded cell, don't worry I've been there already.
I'm afraid your little brain is sitting to comfortable in its padded cell. Shake it up a little and try to learn new things.
K, sorry about the last remarks. That time I did want to offend you but now I'd like to appologise. I was angry because you atacked me as a person and not only my theory. I don't really think what I said about you.
If you take every game, the odd/even is absolutely random, but events that are independent and that have no memory tend to distribute themselves randomly in a series of trials.
The chances are for 50% for each game that the team scores odd or even points but the odd or even totals have the tendency to distribute randomly along a series. That means that is very unlikely that in a series of 20 consecutive trials to come out 20 consecutive odd or even, based on a random probability of 50%. Why don't you look back at some data to see how manny times you'll find 15 consecutive ODD points scored in 10000 games played? I guarantee you that you won't find more than 107 series.
That is the binomial distribution of successes and failures in series and that's not being teached in elementary school.
IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT ODD OR EVEN SCORES ARE DEPENDENT ON PAST EVENTS. THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY INDEPENDENT AND THAT IS WHY THAY TEND TO DISTRIBUTE RANDOMLY IN SERIES OF TRIALS.
And the chances of losing all 6 bets are based on the calculated probability of losing based on the binomial distribution of successses of failures and not based on the math book on elementary school.
And I am having fun and making money in the process. I am not forcing you to take my picks. Don't like it don't buy it, but keep your mouth shut.
And about the padded cell, don't worry I've been there already.
I'm afraid your little brain is sitting to comfortable in its padded cell. Shake it up a little and try to learn new things.
K, sorry about the last remarks. That time I did want to offend you but now I'd like to appologise. I was angry because you atacked me as a person and not only my theory. I don't really think what I said about you.
I don't have the patience to wait to test it. It doesn't necessarily mean it's not working. Anyway I broke my rules and chased odd after 2 or 3 even, so the results are not significant. The point is I should've played odd only after 6 or 7 consecutive even but that requires a lot of patience and discipline to do it and it seems I don't have that discipline. When I'll have enough time to do it I will take all the NBA teams, game by game, 2 or 3 seasons and get the data required to have something significant. Or you are that curious you could do it by your self.
I found something much better, see the "Over / Under Poisson strategy" topic and "Home team ATS system" topic.
If think these two strategies will produce better results and much more quick so I'll pay them all my atention.
Sorry if I let you down.
I don't have the patience to wait to test it. It doesn't necessarily mean it's not working. Anyway I broke my rules and chased odd after 2 or 3 even, so the results are not significant. The point is I should've played odd only after 6 or 7 consecutive even but that requires a lot of patience and discipline to do it and it seems I don't have that discipline. When I'll have enough time to do it I will take all the NBA teams, game by game, 2 or 3 seasons and get the data required to have something significant. Or you are that curious you could do it by your self.
I found something much better, see the "Over / Under Poisson strategy" topic and "Home team ATS system" topic.
If think these two strategies will produce better results and much more quick so I'll pay them all my atention.
Sorry if I let you down.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.