Longterm Goal of the project will be to hit 60% winners...
Ill let you do the math but the numbers will absolutely blow your mind..
The plays will be selected by a wide varitey of ways... In other words, ill use everything available to me to make this project a success...
For those wanting to follow, ill do my very best to provide winners and give you the plays in plenty time to play them.. Most days it will be one play only but on weekends, we could have multiple plays... Remember its going to be 1 play at a time and not just 1 play per day...
Project Bankroll: $1000
Play #1 will be posted before 1PM CST today...
any questions, PM me or email me... we can keep the thread clutter to a minimum...
Falcon
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Project Guidelines...
1. $1000 starting project bankroll
2. risk 10% of PROJECT bankroll on each play
3. wager 1 play at a time...
4. no juice over (-1.10) will ever be layed
5. sides, totals, moneylines can be used
Longterm Goal of the project will be to hit 60% winners...
Ill let you do the math but the numbers will absolutely blow your mind..
The plays will be selected by a wide varitey of ways... In other words, ill use everything available to me to make this project a success...
For those wanting to follow, ill do my very best to provide winners and give you the plays in plenty time to play them.. Most days it will be one play only but on weekends, we could have multiple plays... Remember its going to be 1 play at a time and not just 1 play per day...
Project Bankroll: $1000
Play #1 will be posted before 1PM CST today...
any questions, PM me or email me... we can keep the thread clutter to a minimum...
smdio, this sounds very similar to my thread featuring selective large wagers... Did Thinker steal it? Add in the fact that his $1000 into $100,000 thread is also a lot like my first one and I think we have a legitimate criminal here.
GL Thinker
0
smdio, this sounds very similar to my thread featuring selective large wagers... Did Thinker steal it? Add in the fact that his $1000 into $100,000 thread is also a lot like my first one and I think we have a legitimate criminal here.
hey guys, i didnt copy anyone with the (1k to 100k) but this one looks alot like the one mtp has going with the (kelly criterion) put to the test..
and to him, i apologize...
seriously, ive been wanting to do a project like this for some time..
couple of things, ill say and then ill let you chew on them..
1. if i can keep this thread going for 1000 wagers and i can hit 60% correctly... all of us combined could never spend the money that will be made... this is a fact.. you wont have to worry about 1k to 100k...
2. if you choose to follow this thread, you will never-ever, lose your intital $1000 stake completely, no matter how badly we do... this i can guarantee you..
ill let you kick those 2 things around...
yes Go Ravens..
Falcon
0
hey guys, i didnt copy anyone with the (1k to 100k) but this one looks alot like the one mtp has going with the (kelly criterion) put to the test..
and to him, i apologize...
seriously, ive been wanting to do a project like this for some time..
couple of things, ill say and then ill let you chew on them..
1. if i can keep this thread going for 1000 wagers and i can hit 60% correctly... all of us combined could never spend the money that will be made... this is a fact.. you wont have to worry about 1k to 100k...
2. if you choose to follow this thread, you will never-ever, lose your intital $1000 stake completely, no matter how badly we do... this i can guarantee you..
I kicked those two statements around and both are hog-wash...
Hitting at a 60% clip over 1000 'pick em' plays has never been done... EVER! It's just not possible... BUT if you somehow are the second coming and make it possible, 1000 selective plays will take you well over 5 years to complete...
The second statement is even worst because although it may seem cute on the surface with the idea of not losing your bankroll no matter how bad it goes, you could easily run into wager minimums and that would technically constitute as losing your bankroll as you wouldn't be able to make any more plays.
For example, at Pinny, the minimum wager is two dollars; if my bankroll falls below $20, I suddenly can't make any plays put out by thinker due to this minimum, but because our bankroll is not completely lost, Thinker gets to claim that you'll never lose your bankroll. This examples trickles down to any number so even if your bankroll was a penny, you could bet half a penny, and then a quarter penny, etc.
Just because the possible bets are infinite does not mean that our usable bankroll is!
0
I kicked those two statements around and both are hog-wash...
Hitting at a 60% clip over 1000 'pick em' plays has never been done... EVER! It's just not possible... BUT if you somehow are the second coming and make it possible, 1000 selective plays will take you well over 5 years to complete...
The second statement is even worst because although it may seem cute on the surface with the idea of not losing your bankroll no matter how bad it goes, you could easily run into wager minimums and that would technically constitute as losing your bankroll as you wouldn't be able to make any more plays.
For example, at Pinny, the minimum wager is two dollars; if my bankroll falls below $20, I suddenly can't make any plays put out by thinker due to this minimum, but because our bankroll is not completely lost, Thinker gets to claim that you'll never lose your bankroll. This examples trickles down to any number so even if your bankroll was a penny, you could bet half a penny, and then a quarter penny, etc.
Just because the possible bets are infinite does not mean that our usable bankroll is!
Well good thing you don't run the forums and this isn't a popularity contest... I will do what I please.
Besides, you're the one who is the one spouting off guarantees that people won't lose their bankroll; I'm simply informing them that no such guarantees can possibly exist in the world of sports betting. Someone has to be the voice of reason around here.
0
Well good thing you don't run the forums and this isn't a popularity contest... I will do what I please.
Besides, you're the one who is the one spouting off guarantees that people won't lose their bankroll; I'm simply informing them that no such guarantees can possibly exist in the world of sports betting. Someone has to be the voice of reason around here.
Thinker.....just ignore Dj ....I think he is just a forum junkie...and is hooked!!....He has been floating in my thread as well.....So how do you plan to have this 60% record....Is there some kind of system or are you just going to be cappingyour games and hoping for the best?
0
Thinker.....just ignore Dj ....I think he is just a forum junkie...and is hooked!!....He has been floating in my thread as well.....So how do you plan to have this 60% record....Is there some kind of system or are you just going to be cappingyour games and hoping for the best?
Thinker.....just ignore Dj ....I think he is just a forum junkie...and is hooked!!....He has been floating in my thread as well.....So how do you plan to have this 60% record....Is there some kind of system or are you just going to be cappingyour games and hoping for the best?
who the hell are you ?...another perfect example of how sad this forum has become, and why i rarely post here anymore. But really, you come here with a parlay system ...a parlay system ??? .biggest sucker bet there is, and then you bash DJ who has been posting winners month after month here.....gtfo
and oh...gl thinker.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tombrady:
Thinker.....just ignore Dj ....I think he is just a forum junkie...and is hooked!!....He has been floating in my thread as well.....So how do you plan to have this 60% record....Is there some kind of system or are you just going to be cappingyour games and hoping for the best?
who the hell are you ?...another perfect example of how sad this forum has become, and why i rarely post here anymore. But really, you come here with a parlay system ...a parlay system ??? .biggest sucker bet there is, and then you bash DJ who has been posting winners month after month here.....gtfo
bwcareer; I would love for Thinker (or anyone) to hit 60% because we could all get rich... but the fact of the matter is that 'hard work' can't make you foresee the future. 57% is a more reasonable goal IMO but hey, let's shoot for the moon and land among stars right? Despite Thinker's preemptive negativity towards me, I sincerely hope he can do it but I will always maintain that it's just not possible.
0
tombrady, you parlay therefore you fail...
bwcareer; I would love for Thinker (or anyone) to hit 60% because we could all get rich... but the fact of the matter is that 'hard work' can't make you foresee the future. 57% is a more reasonable goal IMO but hey, let's shoot for the moon and land among stars right? Despite Thinker's preemptive negativity towards me, I sincerely hope he can do it but I will always maintain that it's just not possible.
bwcareer; I would love for Thinker (or anyone) to hit 60% because we could all get rich... but the fact of the matter is that 'hard work' can't make you foresee the future. 57% is a more reasonable goal IMO but hey, let's shoot for the moon and land among stars right? Despite Thinker's preemptive negativity towards me, I sincerely hope he can do it but I will always maintain that it's just not possible.
DJ - you said yourself in one of your active threads your goal was to hit 60% in all sports. How is this different than Thinkers goal? Nobody went in your thread and told you it was IMPOSSIBLE. Best of luck to BOTH of you with winners for all of us.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dj_destroyer:
tombrady, you parlay therefore you fail...
bwcareer; I would love for Thinker (or anyone) to hit 60% because we could all get rich... but the fact of the matter is that 'hard work' can't make you foresee the future. 57% is a more reasonable goal IMO but hey, let's shoot for the moon and land among stars right? Despite Thinker's preemptive negativity towards me, I sincerely hope he can do it but I will always maintain that it's just not possible.
DJ - you said yourself in one of your active threads your goal was to hit 60% in all sports. How is this different than Thinkers goal? Nobody went in your thread and told you it was IMPOSSIBLE. Best of luck to BOTH of you with winners for all of us.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
GL Thinker
Hot Forum Topics
