Posted:
#1
Thread must have gotten erased somehow, perhaps it was how I was formatting it.
The results are in. Honestly, I am actually legitimately surprised I even came up with rational numbers that coincide with what the books are thinking. There is only 1 game that ended up standing out where a team is laying chalk and the underdog is the computer pick by a wide margin. My computer either totally disrespects Houston or has warm feelings for Cleveland.
That leads me to wonder exactly how these spreads are thought of. Remember, I do not skew results for :
1. Strength Of Schedule
2. Home / Away
3. Wins Losses
4. Any previous ATS
So everything is basically "straight-up" if you want to view it in that manner. So no such thing as home field advantage of turf/grass etc..
1. Bookies say San Diego - 8.5 / Computer Says San Diego -9.54
2. Bookies say Houston -4.5 / Computer Says Kansas City -4.1
3. Bookies say New England -2.5 / Computer Says NE - 2.05
4. Bookies say New Orleans -4 / Computer Says PK (NO <1/4th pt)
5. Bookies say Philly -2.5 / Computer Says PK (Phil Almost -1/2pt)
6. Bookies say NYG -10 / Computer Says NYG -4.13
7. Bookies say Chicago -6 / Computer Says Chicago -1
8. Bookies say Green Bay -3 / Computer Says GB - 2.15
9. Bookies say Pitt - 14 / Computer Says Pitt -5.39
10. Bookies say NYJ - 3 / Computer Says NYJ - 4.87
11. Bookies say San Fran -7 / Computer Says San Fran -1/2
12. Bookies say Minnesota -1.5 / Computer Says Minnesota -1/2
13. Bookies say Indianapolis -3 / Computer Says Indy -2.52
14. Bookies say Tennessee -3 / Computer Says Tennessee -6.2
So there you have it. Feel free to comment or call me an 8-up kinda guy. Tough to hurt my feelings!
GL to all no matter which way you go. But I warn you not to fade Hal-9000, haha.
0
Hot Forum Topics
