I had a fight with my friends...they think Serena is on par with Murray and other top 10 ATP players in strength and skill. They are crazy, i know. my friends and tennis knowledge.
my opinion: top 100, even top 200 ATP players would beat Serena easily, 2-0.
share your thoughts please so i can show them what you think. and no bullshit please.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I had a fight with my friends...they think Serena is on par with Murray and other top 10 ATP players in strength and skill. They are crazy, i know. my friends and tennis knowledge.
my opinion: top 100, even top 200 ATP players would beat Serena easily, 2-0.
share your thoughts please so i can show them what you think. and no bullshit please.
Agree Serena has a faster serve than almost half of the players in the top 100 of the atp. I mean she serves 120 mph and has hit 125 mph serve so yeah could beat some of those atp players.
0
Agree Serena has a faster serve than almost half of the players in the top 100 of the atp. I mean she serves 120 mph and has hit 125 mph serve so yeah could beat some of those atp players.
not a chance in hell she could beat a professional male tennis player. You guys that think she can have never picked up a tennis racket. Just because she can serve it at 120 doesnt mean shes going to make every single first serve in at 120. You guys are dillusional
0
not a chance in hell she could beat a professional male tennis player. You guys that think she can have never picked up a tennis racket. Just because she can serve it at 120 doesnt mean shes going to make every single first serve in at 120. You guys are dillusional
Serena's power is what makes her dominant in womens tennis... Her power probably be below-average in a Challenger tourney in the ATP.
She'd lose in straight to everyone in the top 100.. and most poeple in the top 200... Anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool.
dont be foolish,just look at her body now find me a guy other than nadal whos more bulky than serena.the reason shes most dominant female player ever is that shes like a man amongst women.im 100% sure she would be able to beat the likes of Ryan Harrison ranked 97,Michael Russell 95,Dudi Sela 88,Alex Bogomolov 81,Alejando falla 77 in straight sets.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BrianLaverty:
LOL
No way... not a chance.
Serena's power is what makes her dominant in womens tennis... Her power probably be below-average in a Challenger tourney in the ATP.
She'd lose in straight to everyone in the top 100.. and most poeple in the top 200... Anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool.
dont be foolish,just look at her body now find me a guy other than nadal whos more bulky than serena.the reason shes most dominant female player ever is that shes like a man amongst women.im 100% sure she would be able to beat the likes of Ryan Harrison ranked 97,Michael Russell 95,Dudi Sela 88,Alex Bogomolov 81,Alejando falla 77 in straight sets.
A fourth event dubbed "Battle of the sexes" took place during the 1998 Australian Open[19] between the 203rd ranked male player Karsten Braasch and the Williams sisters. The match took place on court number 12 in Melbourne Park.[20] First Braasch - who was 30 at the time - took on Venus Williams and beat her 6–2. He also played Serena Williams and won 6–1 after the Williams sisters, who were 17 and 16 at the time, said they could beat any man ranked 200 or worse. [21] Braasch said afterwards, "500 and above, no chance" as he claimed he had played like someone ranked 600 in order to keep the game "fun."[22]
0
A fourth event dubbed "Battle of the sexes" took place during the 1998 Australian Open[19] between the 203rd ranked male player Karsten Braasch and the Williams sisters. The match took place on court number 12 in Melbourne Park.[20] First Braasch - who was 30 at the time - took on Venus Williams and beat her 6–2. He also played Serena Williams and won 6–1 after the Williams sisters, who were 17 and 16 at the time, said they could beat any man ranked 200 or worse. [21] Braasch said afterwards, "500 and above, no chance" as he claimed he had played like someone ranked 600 in order to keep the game "fun."[22]
Serena could possibly beat the very lowest of ranked guys. 500s to 1000s. these are guys who end up being hitting partners for the top mens and womens players.
she'd be lucky to get a game off the top ranked mens players.
0
Serena could possibly beat the very lowest of ranked guys. 500s to 1000s. these are guys who end up being hitting partners for the top mens and womens players.
she'd be lucky to get a game off the top ranked mens players.
dont be foolish,just look at her body now find me a guy other than nadal whos more bulky than serena.the reason shes most dominant female player ever is that shes like a man amongst women.im 100% sure she would be able to beat the likes of Ryan Harrison ranked 97,Michael Russell 95,Dudi Sela 88,Alex Bogomolov 81,Alejando falla 77 in straight sets.
You are joking, right?
0
Quote Originally Posted by bogaty:
dont be foolish,just look at her body now find me a guy other than nadal whos more bulky than serena.the reason shes most dominant female player ever is that shes like a man amongst women.im 100% sure she would be able to beat the likes of Ryan Harrison ranked 97,Michael Russell 95,Dudi Sela 88,Alex Bogomolov 81,Alejando falla 77 in straight sets.
The speed of the mens game compared to the womens is night and day. First serve speed is not the only thing guys. Couple things to keep in mind:
1. The speed and spin of 2nd serves is a lot higher in the mens game...especially in the spin department. Very few women can get kick serve 2nd serves. Williams-Stosur-etc.
2. The speed of exchanges is faster in the mens game. Meaning less time for Serena to move into position. The average man creates alot more pop off the groudn than the average woman.
3. Serena is not used to people returning her 1st serve. The mens top 100 is going to get a lot more balls back into play and that brings us back to point #2.
Factor in the pressure of playing a man in a high profile match and I think he get a very one sided loss for Serena against any in the top 100. Her only chance would be against a clay courter on a grass court.
Lookign at the rankings I see only 1 person she might be a to trouble. She might be able to give Volandri fits on grass
0
The speed of the mens game compared to the womens is night and day. First serve speed is not the only thing guys. Couple things to keep in mind:
1. The speed and spin of 2nd serves is a lot higher in the mens game...especially in the spin department. Very few women can get kick serve 2nd serves. Williams-Stosur-etc.
2. The speed of exchanges is faster in the mens game. Meaning less time for Serena to move into position. The average man creates alot more pop off the groudn than the average woman.
3. Serena is not used to people returning her 1st serve. The mens top 100 is going to get a lot more balls back into play and that brings us back to point #2.
Factor in the pressure of playing a man in a high profile match and I think he get a very one sided loss for Serena against any in the top 100. Her only chance would be against a clay courter on a grass court.
Lookign at the rankings I see only 1 person she might be a to trouble. She might be able to give Volandri fits on grass
dont be foolish,just look at her body now find me a guy other than nadal whos more bulky than serena.the reason shes most dominant female player ever is that shes like a man amongst women.im 100% sure she would be able to beat the likes of Ryan Harrison ranked 97,Michael Russell 95,Dudi Sela 88,Alex Bogomolov 81,Alejando falla 77 in straight sets.
you have no idea what the hell you are talking about. Youre comparing her strength with other women. She would be way way way too slow for men. You are a damn fool man. She wouldnt win more than a game or 2 per set against these scrubs. Dont be ridiculous its VERY OBVIOUS YOU HAVE NEVER PLAYED TENNIS IN YOUR LIFE
0
Quote Originally Posted by bogaty:
dont be foolish,just look at her body now find me a guy other than nadal whos more bulky than serena.the reason shes most dominant female player ever is that shes like a man amongst women.im 100% sure she would be able to beat the likes of Ryan Harrison ranked 97,Michael Russell 95,Dudi Sela 88,Alex Bogomolov 81,Alejando falla 77 in straight sets.
you have no idea what the hell you are talking about. Youre comparing her strength with other women. She would be way way way too slow for men. You are a damn fool man. She wouldnt win more than a game or 2 per set against these scrubs. Dont be ridiculous its VERY OBVIOUS YOU HAVE NEVER PLAYED TENNIS IN YOUR LIFE
dont be foolish,just look at her body now find me a guy other than nadal whos more bulky than serena.the reason shes most dominant female player ever is that shes like a man amongst women.im 100% sure she would be able to beat the likes of Ryan Harrison ranked 97,Michael Russell 95,Dudi Sela 88,Alex Bogomolov 81,Alejando falla 77 in straight sets.
U should be banned from this site for posting such bullshit. Ryan Harrsion would win 6-0 6-0 dont even question it. Its not even close.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bogaty:
dont be foolish,just look at her body now find me a guy other than nadal whos more bulky than serena.the reason shes most dominant female player ever is that shes like a man amongst women.im 100% sure she would be able to beat the likes of Ryan Harrison ranked 97,Michael Russell 95,Dudi Sela 88,Alex Bogomolov 81,Alejando falla 77 in straight sets.
U should be banned from this site for posting such bullshit. Ryan Harrsion would win 6-0 6-0 dont even question it. Its not even close.
I play Tennis at a very low amateur level, but i would have a decent shot at beating Serena. I think i could make the game very close at least.
Wow this one takes the cake. Let me say this, Ive been playing tennis regularly for about 15 yearsz I play with buddies a few times a week and have a coach whom I have once a week lesson, she played as a pro for 8 years ranking somewhere in the top 100. You would have ZERO. Chance at taking more than a point or two. Your brain might be even more retarded than your hair. Gosh what a fool u are.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:
I play Tennis at a very low amateur level, but i would have a decent shot at beating Serena. I think i could make the game very close at least.
Wow this one takes the cake. Let me say this, Ive been playing tennis regularly for about 15 yearsz I play with buddies a few times a week and have a coach whom I have once a week lesson, she played as a pro for 8 years ranking somewhere in the top 100. You would have ZERO. Chance at taking more than a point or two. Your brain might be even more retarded than your hair. Gosh what a fool u are.
I could see her threatening a player ranked in the 600-700's, mainly the inexperienced juniors working their way onto the tour but still don't think she'd win.
0
some of these replies are pure gold
nice topic skillz
no amateur level player would beat Serena
I could see her threatening a player ranked in the 600-700's, mainly the inexperienced juniors working their way onto the tour but still don't think she'd win.
Wow this one takes the cake. Let me say this, Ive been playing tennis regularly for about 15 yearsz I play with buddies a few times a week and have a coach whom I have once a week lesson, she played as a pro for 8 years ranking somewhere in the top 100. You would have ZERO. Chance at taking more than a point or two. Your brain might be even more retarded than your hair. Gosh what a fool u are.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MiamiHeat316:
Wow this one takes the cake. Let me say this, Ive been playing tennis regularly for about 15 yearsz I play with buddies a few times a week and have a coach whom I have once a week lesson, she played as a pro for 8 years ranking somewhere in the top 100. You would have ZERO. Chance at taking more than a point or two. Your brain might be even more retarded than your hair. Gosh what a fool u are.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
in strength and skill. 
my friends and tennis knowledge.
and no bullshit please. 
Hot Forum Topics
