@Christian_iaco its going to be a touchy topic for the foreseable future, but there is one true bottom line here which seems to be agreed upon by many out there...where would womens tennis be had it not been for the media and press in the 70s when Billie Jean King practically begged for attention when setting up that match against Riggs? They would still be playing for peanuts.
Snowflake generation need timeouts and safe rooms if someone dare criticize them in any way, and thats a society problem that is too complex to solve....everyone's hormones are out of whack to the toxic BPA plastics everywhere, chemicals in foods, elevated estrogen in men leading to the LBGTQXYZABC movement, etc.
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
0
@Christian_iaco its going to be a touchy topic for the foreseable future, but there is one true bottom line here which seems to be agreed upon by many out there...where would womens tennis be had it not been for the media and press in the 70s when Billie Jean King practically begged for attention when setting up that match against Riggs? They would still be playing for peanuts.
Snowflake generation need timeouts and safe rooms if someone dare criticize them in any way, and thats a society problem that is too complex to solve....everyone's hormones are out of whack to the toxic BPA plastics everywhere, chemicals in foods, elevated estrogen in men leading to the LBGTQXYZABC movement, etc.
Hey Packers, couple questions for you. With tennis being such a unique betting quest compared to other sports at what level would you say it becomes irresponsible in taking juice being that moneyline swings are so much higher in this sport? I know different scenarios would apply but in general what would you say, like beyond -250/300ish? For example I see that you like medvedev spread. His moneyline being a bit over -350, would it be wise to not lay that if I wanted a safer bet? Or in a weird way could it be value at getting the world ranked no.2 at a lower moneyline number then usual this early in a tournament?
0
Hey Packers, couple questions for you. With tennis being such a unique betting quest compared to other sports at what level would you say it becomes irresponsible in taking juice being that moneyline swings are so much higher in this sport? I know different scenarios would apply but in general what would you say, like beyond -250/300ish? For example I see that you like medvedev spread. His moneyline being a bit over -350, would it be wise to not lay that if I wanted a safer bet? Or in a weird way could it be value at getting the world ranked no.2 at a lower moneyline number then usual this early in a tournament?
@pa2918 ...the play below will tell you everything you need to know from my experience:
Locked in:
Medvedev / Federer ML Parlay ... odds (-125)...5u
my personal cut off is usually -200...but it has to be a specific matchup with players i have good sense for their current form...always better to find another similar priced fav to put togehter a 2 team parlay to get close to even money...less risk, less bankroll exposure if the upset does happen, or if the favorite is cruising but gets a freak injury during the match and has to retire
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
3
@pa2918 ...the play below will tell you everything you need to know from my experience:
Locked in:
Medvedev / Federer ML Parlay ... odds (-125)...5u
my personal cut off is usually -200...but it has to be a specific matchup with players i have good sense for their current form...always better to find another similar priced fav to put togehter a 2 team parlay to get close to even money...less risk, less bankroll exposure if the upset does happen, or if the favorite is cruising but gets a freak injury during the match and has to retire
Appreciate it! Makes total sense, I think ive been playing with fire with these higher ingame moneylines so I’ll stop while im ahead. The parlay advice is way better strategy and damn that federer/medvedev is a must play.
0
Appreciate it! Makes total sense, I think ive been playing with fire with these higher ingame moneylines so I’ll stop while im ahead. The parlay advice is way better strategy and damn that federer/medvedev is a must play.
Few years ago Buzy was on the climb but had a freak leg/ankle injury running into the back wall at a tournament hustling to get a ball back like she was always fighting for every point...ever since then, shes never regained that elusive form.
I cant see any way she wins here unless Serena gets DQ'd for threatening to shove a tennis ball down a line judges throat...FOOT FAULT
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
0
@marquee_
Few years ago Buzy was on the climb but had a freak leg/ankle injury running into the back wall at a tournament hustling to get a ball back like she was always fighting for every point...ever since then, shes never regained that elusive form.
I cant see any way she wins here unless Serena gets DQ'd for threatening to shove a tennis ball down a line judges throat...FOOT FAULT
I remember. I used to fade her around 2017 when she started her ascension winning all these itf tournaments in Asia. Lost a lot of money fading n I just started following her career.
it was actually raining when she got injured. She asked the umpire to suspend play due to dangerous court conditions and was denied.
1
@packersbackers
I remember. I used to fade her around 2017 when she started her ascension winning all these itf tournaments in Asia. Lost a lot of money fading n I just started following her career.
it was actually raining when she got injured. She asked the umpire to suspend play due to dangerous court conditions and was denied.
Considering a max wager on Swiatek +275 with a minor hedge on Sabalenka +600...both on opposite sides of the draw. FYI...Barty is carrying an injury...fade her against Jabeur or Gauff
I am super tilted at myself for not taking Linette ML +500 on my book that pays out for retirements...i knew Barty aggravated something in her last match and i completrly forgot this match was being played today
Hope.some of you guys capatilized
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
1
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
Considering a max wager on Swiatek +275 with a minor hedge on Sabalenka +600...both on opposite sides of the draw. FYI...Barty is carrying an injury...fade her against Jabeur or Gauff
I am super tilted at myself for not taking Linette ML +500 on my book that pays out for retirements...i knew Barty aggravated something in her last match and i completrly forgot this match was being played today
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.