Smh. Why am I on this play.
Shocked with myself I listened to any of you outside of blindly fading this.
wont even bother reading commentary, just fade whatever these plays are tomorrow.
Shocked with myself I listened to any of you outside of blindly fading this.
wont even bother reading commentary, just fade whatever these plays are tomorrow.
There are 5 matches? - This guy is a joke of course, so he will just pick something random - but the two women's semifinales the market has priced more or less spot on (imo)
Purcell/Thomson should not be -150 - so that will be my bet today - and I will watch from a distance as this guy decides who to bet on depending on who he finds most attractive
There are 5 matches? - This guy is a joke of course, so he will just pick something random - but the two women's semifinales the market has priced more or less spot on (imo)
Purcell/Thomson should not be -150 - so that will be my bet today - and I will watch from a distance as this guy decides who to bet on depending on who he finds most attractive
how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story!
how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story!
Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's.
Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's.
What makes this a joke is that he would have taken that bet if it was +220 instead of +260, because they only take it because they like how he played last game, because he has a cool cap or that chick is way more hot than her opponent - which, not surprisingly, is not how you beat a Trillion dollar industry that lives and breathes sports and odds.
What makes this a joke is that he would have taken that bet if it was +220 instead of +260, because they only take it because they like how he played last game, because he has a cool cap or that chick is way more hot than her opponent - which, not surprisingly, is not how you beat a Trillion dollar industry that lives and breathes sports and odds.
the force is strong in this one...
Damn coach your black cloud strikes again
You need to make a sacrifice to appease the gambling gods...at home castration may help
the force is strong in this one...
Damn coach your black cloud strikes again
You need to make a sacrifice to appease the gambling gods...at home castration may help
they went broke because they made a bunch of bets that lost!
ask Billy Walters about line value.
they went broke because they made a bunch of bets that lost!
ask Billy Walters about line value.
It is like if you go out and ask all your friends how many of you should be in a room - for it being more likely than not that at least two of those people share birthdays - ALL of them who do not understand or use math would guess too high - it is 29 ppl in case you do not understand how to calculate it.
It is like if you go out and ask all your friends how many of you should be in a room - for it being more likely than not that at least two of those people share birthdays - ALL of them who do not understand or use math would guess too high - it is 29 ppl in case you do not understand how to calculate it.
It's obvious he just counts dollars as units like some people do, which IMO defeats the purpose of units. I thought a bankroll is supposed to be 100 units no matter how much cash it is overall?
To this schmuck 47 units is 47 dollars I believe
It's obvious he just counts dollars as units like some people do, which IMO defeats the purpose of units. I thought a bankroll is supposed to be 100 units no matter how much cash it is overall?
To this schmuck 47 units is 47 dollars I believe
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.