All Forums | Tennis

Medvedev to win +260!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 777
Posts: 51
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 6707
Posted: #26

Smh. Why am I on this play.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 8364
Posted: #27

This guys a fucking cocksucker. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 8364
Posted: #28

Shocked with myself I listened to any of you outside of blindly fading this.

wont even bother reading commentary, just fade whatever these plays are tomorrow.

thumbs_up

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 222
Posted: #29

@vaas187

 no games tomorrow mr angry guy

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 6707
Posted: #30

@PossessionTaken

 There are 2 games. NPC can you stay quiet.

 

smh.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2023
Posts: 601
Posted: #31

Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang:

@PossessionTaken  There are 2 games. NPC can you stay quiet.   smh.

 

There are 5 matches? - This guy is a joke of course, so he will just pick something random - but the two women's semifinales the market has priced more or less spot on (imo)

Purcell/Thomson should not be -150 - so that will be my bet today - and I will watch from a distance as this guy decides who to bet on depending on who he finds most attractive an_violinthejester

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2021
Posts: 327
Posted: #32

Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang:

Smh. Why am I on this play.

 

thejester

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2021
Posts: 327
Posted: #33

Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang:

Smh. Why am I on this play.

 

how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story! 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2023
Posts: 601
Posted: #34

Quote Originally Posted by CMac12:

Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play.   how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story!

 

 

Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2023
Posts: 601
Posted: #35

What makes this a joke is that he would have taken that bet if it was +220 instead of +260, because they only take it because they like how he played last game, because he has a cool cap or that chick is way more hot than her opponent - which, not surprisingly, is not how you beat a Trillion dollar industry that lives and breathes sports and odds.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2017
Posts: 1643
Posted: #36

 the force is strong in this one...

Damn coach your black cloud strikes again

You need to make a sacrifice to appease the gambling gods...at home castration may help

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2021
Posts: 327
Posted: #37

Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:

Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play.   how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story!     Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's.

 

new_poop they went broke because they made a bunch of bets that lost!

ask Billy Walters about line value.  new_moj_wink

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 3550
Posted: #38

@vaas187

 Welcome.   That's what this forum is for.  Been doing it for years.  

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2023
Posts: 601
Posted: #39

Quote Originally Posted by CMac12:

Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play.   how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story!     Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's.    they went broke because they made a bunch of bets that lost! ask Billy Walters about line value.


They went broke because they didn't know how to price an "unlikely" event properly

Don't get the Billy Walters reference ? - Have you just learned about him and wanted to show you knew something that has been something in this space or what?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2023
Posts: 601
Posted: #40

It is like if you go out and ask all your friends how many of you should be in a room - for it being more likely than not that at least two of those people share birthdays - ALL of them who do not understand or use math would guess too high - it is 29 ppl in case you do not understand how to calculate it.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2021
Posts: 327
Posted: #41

Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:

It is like if you go out and ask all your friends how many of you should be in a room - for it being more likely than not that at least two of those people share birthdays - ALL of them who do not understand or use math would guess too high - it is 29 ppl in case you do not understand how to calculate it.

new_poop

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2021
Posts: 327
Posted: #42

Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:

Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play.   how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story!     Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's.    they went broke because they made a bunch of bets that lost! ask Billy Walters about line value. They went broke because they didn't know how to price an "unlikely" event properlyDon't get the Billy Walters reference ? - Have you just learned about him and wanted to show you knew something that has been something in this space or what?

 

an_shake

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2023
Posts: 601
Posted: #43

an_boggienightthejester

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2021
Posts: 327
Posted: #44

new_laugh_cry

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2023
Posts: 601
Posted: #45

Quote Originally Posted by CMac12:

an_boggienightan_baby

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 5907
Posted: #46

What a buman_beatup

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2021
Posts: 327
Posted: #47

@Calde13

 an_punch

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2023
Posts: 601
Posted: #48

Quote Originally Posted by CMac12:

@Calde13

an_razzquiet

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 3550
Posted: #49

To bad ol coach don't bet on the women..  seeing he use to guide them u would think he has the inside scoop.   cool

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2024
Posts: 3027
Posted: #50

Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:

How does he have any units left...   Are we using the metric system here...

It's obvious he just counts dollars as units like some people do, which IMO defeats the purpose of units. I thought a bankroll is supposed to be 100 units no matter how much cash it is overall?

To this schmuck 47 units is 47 dollars I believe 

Banned for using a burning $ emoji. Lol. TRUMP 2024!!!
All Forums | Tennis
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.