Initial leans: -ferrer in 3 average length sets -nadal wins easily but that line is straight up disrespectful -murray has been solid but verdasco will get a set off him atleast and maybe upset -ggl and monfils are in for a long 4 or 5 set match
Plays shortly
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
356-359-16 +20.06 units ytd
Initial leans: -ferrer in 3 average length sets -nadal wins easily but that line is straight up disrespectful -murray has been solid but verdasco will get a set off him atleast and maybe upset -ggl and monfils are in for a long 4 or 5 set match
First play: verdasco/murray o40 -115 1.15 to win 1 This match should go atleast 4 long sets but a 5 setter could also be in the cards. Dont see either player winning in straights and cant really call a winner at this point
0
First play: verdasco/murray o40 -115 1.15 to win 1 This match should go atleast 4 long sets but a 5 setter could also be in the cards. Dont see either player winning in straights and cant really call a winner at this point
Adding: GGL +3 -110 1.1 to win 1 I will sacrifice some value in the ml and take the ats bc this is going to be difficult gor ggl to pull off in monfils home but he should get very close. I can see 4 or 5 sets (like the murray match) and slightly lean ggl to win it. Pressure will be on though. I can see monfils dumping a set 62 or 61 to really aid this bet too
0
Adding: GGL +3 -110 1.1 to win 1 I will sacrifice some value in the ml and take the ats bc this is going to be difficult gor ggl to pull off in monfils home but he should get very close. I can see 4 or 5 sets (like the murray match) and slightly lean ggl to win it. Pressure will be on though. I can see monfils dumping a set 62 or 61 to really aid this bet too
Well if lajovic can beat delbonis in straight sets, than why cant he win 7 or 8 games off rafa? Further, he beat haase 2-0 and won a set off vesely each time they played last year. Not like he doesnt know to play tennis. With that being said, i dont think i can touch if unless the line moved to +11.5 or 12 cause there are better plays tomorrow
0
Well if lajovic can beat delbonis in straight sets, than why cant he win 7 or 8 games off rafa? Further, he beat haase 2-0 and won a set off vesely each time they played last year. Not like he doesnt know to play tennis. With that being said, i dont think i can touch if unless the line moved to +11.5 or 12 cause there are better plays tomorrow
Adding: ferrer/anderson u32 -105 1.05 to win 1 I think most ppl agree here that ferrer is a beast, esp on clay and that anderson is ok on clay but this is a bad match up for him. Look no further than the matchup last year in french open when ferrer won 63 61 61. Surely anderson can do better than that but something like 75 64 63 seems best case and that covers the under.
0
Adding: ferrer/anderson u32 -105 1.05 to win 1 I think most ppl agree here that ferrer is a beast, esp on clay and that anderson is ok on clay but this is a bad match up for him. Look no further than the matchup last year in french open when ferrer won 63 61 61. Surely anderson can do better than that but something like 75 64 63 seems best case and that covers the under.
This constant cheating on the record is comical. You make a math error almost everyday but claim to be an accountant
You were +21.48 going into Saturday... you lost .3 units
putting you at 21.18. You were up .52 units today putting you at 21/70 units. Factoring in the convenient Gasquet exclusion you lost 2.33 with him. That puts you at 19.37 units.
When you factor all of the errors at the beginning of the season with the 9 unit win you counted on an error line and you are probably even money. And lets not forget the countless martingales through the season
0
This constant cheating on the record is comical. You make a math error almost everyday but claim to be an accountant
You were +21.48 going into Saturday... you lost .3 units
putting you at 21.18. You were up .52 units today putting you at 21/70 units. Factoring in the convenient Gasquet exclusion you lost 2.33 with him. That puts you at 19.37 units.
When you factor all of the errors at the beginning of the season with the 9 unit win you counted on an error line and you are probably even money. And lets not forget the countless martingales through the season
Redo your math again sparty. You are the incorrect one. I properly accounted for the gasquet loss. Now get lost, grown folks trying to make money over here. Go to your local town hall meeting if youre bored and want to complain
0
Redo your math again sparty. You are the incorrect one. I properly accounted for the gasquet loss. Now get lost, grown folks trying to make money over here. Go to your local town hall meeting if youre bored and want to complain
Adding 1 wta play for tomorrow bc i like the line so much:
Stephens/halep o20 -108 1.08 to win 1 Surprised the line is so inflated. Sure halep is awesome, but stephens is 2-1 h2h although both wins were hard court. I think sloane continues to give her all in the slams and 1 long set or a set won by stephens will likely win this
0
Adding 1 wta play for tomorrow bc i like the line so much:
Stephens/halep o20 -108 1.08 to win 1 Surprised the line is so inflated. Sure halep is awesome, but stephens is 2-1 h2h although both wins were hard court. I think sloane continues to give her all in the slams and 1 long set or a set won by stephens will likely win this
I showed you the math above you moron. It's basic math ... go back to school and at least get your GED. i don't think touting tennis selections is in your future
0
I showed you the math above you moron. It's basic math ... go back to school and at least get your GED. i don't think touting tennis selections is in your future
Halep should wipe the floor with Stephens. Sure the h2h is in the Anerican's favor, but that was before Simona had her transformation into a top 10 player. Behind Serena, she's one of the few women players you can count on the most nowadays to win consistently.
0
Halep should wipe the floor with Stephens. Sure the h2h is in the Anerican's favor, but that was before Simona had her transformation into a top 10 player. Behind Serena, she's one of the few women players you can count on the most nowadays to win consistently.
if i get back to break even i will not post on here anymore. disgusting run lately as i was up at +48 units about 3 weeks ago. things have turned sour, fade away
0
0-5 -5.53 units lost today....wowzers!
356-364-16 +14.53 units ytd.
if i get back to break even i will not post on here anymore. disgusting run lately as i was up at +48 units about 3 weeks ago. things have turned sour, fade away
Halep should wipe the floor with Stephens. Sure the h2h is in the Anerican's favor, but that was before Simona had her transformation into a top 10 player. Behind Serena, she's one of the few women players you can count on the most nowadays to win consistently.
As in transformation you mean having her boobs cut off. Losing those tattas shes a top 10 player because of it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PeachyRider:
Halep should wipe the floor with Stephens. Sure the h2h is in the Anerican's favor, but that was before Simona had her transformation into a top 10 player. Behind Serena, she's one of the few women players you can count on the most nowadays to win consistently.
As in transformation you mean having her boobs cut off. Losing those tattas shes a top 10 player because of it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.