Just started looking at this website last week. Incredible job Sentinel, thank you. I started with comparing my picks to yours and they have all been on the money. Cheers!
0
Just started looking at this website last week. Incredible job Sentinel, thank you. I started with comparing my picks to yours and they have all been on the money. Cheers!
Just started looking at this website last week. Incredible job Sentinel, thank you. I started with comparing my picks to yours and they have all been on the money. Cheers!
Thanks Jimbob, it's going very strong at the moment. My best start to a year ever.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jimbob81:
Just started looking at this website last week. Incredible job Sentinel, thank you. I started with comparing my picks to yours and they have all been on the money. Cheers!
Thanks Jimbob, it's going very strong at the moment. My best start to a year ever.
Sad thread. 26 days and almost 10% improvement of initial bankroll. And this is supposed to be a succesful month. But keep up the good work, by this rate we'll be rich in 2050.
0
Sad thread. 26 days and almost 10% improvement of initial bankroll. And this is supposed to be a succesful month. But keep up the good work, by this rate we'll be rich in 2050.
The way he decide to do his bankroll increase is something.. but his hit ratio and win ratio is out of this world. So please stop claiming something, without having clear knowledge on his hit ratio.. :-)
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chaz22:
Sad thread
The way he decide to do his bankroll increase is something.. but his hit ratio and win ratio is out of this world. So please stop claiming something, without having clear knowledge on his hit ratio.. :-)
Hey Chass, you probably don't even have a job do you? Nothing comes easy...
Probably, probably... Who cares on win/hit ratio if average odds are 1.5.. If i would pick Djokovic only my win/hit ratio would be way better. Would you be dancing then as well? I dont see any argument why exactly a selection is made. Just based on a feel. Wow. Neat. Also when guy was loosing and found himself in 970 something suddenly a 30 unit selections were introduced. Imagine what would happen of those didnt win.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jimbob81:
Hey Chass, you probably don't even have a job do you? Nothing comes easy...
Probably, probably... Who cares on win/hit ratio if average odds are 1.5.. If i would pick Djokovic only my win/hit ratio would be way better. Would you be dancing then as well? I dont see any argument why exactly a selection is made. Just based on a feel. Wow. Neat. Also when guy was loosing and found himself in 970 something suddenly a 30 unit selections were introduced. Imagine what would happen of those didnt win.
Sentinel, don't even respond to the negative people on here.
The first sign that you are dealing with someone who knows nothing about sports betting. Is they dont realize, if you can come out of a month with even a 7% increase on your bankroll. You have done extremely well. Yes I could stake higher. But im experienced enough to know that one bad losing streak of 6 or more and you would be DESTROYED. If you were risking say 5% of your roll as the starting bet. I dont suffer MANY losing streaks beyond FIVE. In fact in 8 years its only happened twice. A 6 streak and a 7 streak. So knowing that I COULD go nuclear and make three times as much.
But I believe in the saying TALK QUITELY BUT WALK WITH A BIG STICK. The big stick in this case being your bankroll.
So dont worry no clueless haters are going to scare me away. I have one more pick today. Later, most of you wont be able to play it though because its Estrella at the Santo Domingo challenger tournament. He is the closest thing I see today to a dead cert. And im trying to win my 100th bet this year to end my first hundred picks with a very respectable 74% STRIKERATE...
Tomorrow it will be business as usual and I will have 5 or 6 picks for you guys....
0
Quote Originally Posted by accountant4life:
Sentinel, don't even respond to the negative people on here.
The first sign that you are dealing with someone who knows nothing about sports betting. Is they dont realize, if you can come out of a month with even a 7% increase on your bankroll. You have done extremely well. Yes I could stake higher. But im experienced enough to know that one bad losing streak of 6 or more and you would be DESTROYED. If you were risking say 5% of your roll as the starting bet. I dont suffer MANY losing streaks beyond FIVE. In fact in 8 years its only happened twice. A 6 streak and a 7 streak. So knowing that I COULD go nuclear and make three times as much.
But I believe in the saying TALK QUITELY BUT WALK WITH A BIG STICK. The big stick in this case being your bankroll.
So dont worry no clueless haters are going to scare me away. I have one more pick today. Later, most of you wont be able to play it though because its Estrella at the Santo Domingo challenger tournament. He is the closest thing I see today to a dead cert. And im trying to win my 100th bet this year to end my first hundred picks with a very respectable 74% STRIKERATE...
Tomorrow it will be business as usual and I will have 5 or 6 picks for you guys....
Probably, probably... Who cares on win/hit ratio if average odds are 1.5.. If i would pick Djokovic only my win/hit ratio would be way better. Would you be dancing then as well? I dont see any argument why exactly a selection is made. Just based on a feel. Wow. Neat. Also when guy was loosing and found himself in 970 something suddenly a 30 unit selections were introduced. Imagine what would happen of those didnt win.
When you can present a100 plays with a better STRIKERATE. AND MORE IMPORTANTLY LESS THAT THREE CONSECUTIVE LOSSES. You have bragging rights, until then you have a lot of work to do.
I could risk 5% of my roll because my losing streaks are shorter than any capper I've ever seen. When you pay some guy 300 dollars a month for picks and he gives you 10 straight winners followed by 11 straight losses. You will understand this. A strategy is only as good as its weakest link. And the weakest link is ALWAYS THE LOSING STREAK. And I've yet to see any capper better my lack of long losing streaks. If they existed the gambling industry would be in trouble...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chaz22:
Probably, probably... Who cares on win/hit ratio if average odds are 1.5.. If i would pick Djokovic only my win/hit ratio would be way better. Would you be dancing then as well? I dont see any argument why exactly a selection is made. Just based on a feel. Wow. Neat. Also when guy was loosing and found himself in 970 something suddenly a 30 unit selections were introduced. Imagine what would happen of those didnt win.
When you can present a100 plays with a better STRIKERATE. AND MORE IMPORTANTLY LESS THAT THREE CONSECUTIVE LOSSES. You have bragging rights, until then you have a lot of work to do.
I could risk 5% of my roll because my losing streaks are shorter than any capper I've ever seen. When you pay some guy 300 dollars a month for picks and he gives you 10 straight winners followed by 11 straight losses. You will understand this. A strategy is only as good as its weakest link. And the weakest link is ALWAYS THE LOSING STREAK. And I've yet to see any capper better my lack of long losing streaks. If they existed the gambling industry would be in trouble...
Hey Sentinel I will be on Estrella as well, but what do you think of Millman? He's in your price range, and he's been on a good run...
Yes my friend I like him too. But if I have to go for just one. ESTRELLA has the edge in my opinion. It's like Gasquet at Montpellier. He is playing a home tournie. He will want to do well in front of his people...
0
Quote Originally Posted by coscos:
Hey Sentinel I will be on Estrella as well, but what do you think of Millman? He's in your price range, and he's been on a good run...
Yes my friend I like him too. But if I have to go for just one. ESTRELLA has the edge in my opinion. It's like Gasquet at Montpellier. He is playing a home tournie. He will want to do well in front of his people...
Im mostly here to see EPs tournament write-ups but then i noticed this huge thread and started to follow a bit just to see if this strategy is worth it (no no i didnt pick a single bet from here - 1.4 is a dead end IMO). Im not saying its not working it just takes so much time so if someone started with 1000$ he would make 80 bucks in a month. Awesome. The fun thing is that clowns dont realize that and tend to follow this billionair strategy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jimbob81:
If you have it all figured out, why are you here?
Im mostly here to see EPs tournament write-ups but then i noticed this huge thread and started to follow a bit just to see if this strategy is worth it (no no i didnt pick a single bet from here - 1.4 is a dead end IMO). Im not saying its not working it just takes so much time so if someone started with 1000$ he would make 80 bucks in a month. Awesome. The fun thing is that clowns dont realize that and tend to follow this billionair strategy.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.