I maintain that if you get to 2500 units it will be due to your picks not your glorified chase system
Nevertheless I genuinely hope you get there
Might even be worth a separate thread for your non system picks such as Burukake-thingy....
It will be due to both. As you CORRECTLY pointed out. Being good at picking winners with SLACK money management can still lead to negative figures. I got slack wth Del Potro and Gasquet a few weeks ago. I will not allow EMOTIONAL betting back into the picture again.
From now on the only way I take a blow is to lose my progression of 144. And to do that I have to do something I'm not very good at. Pick 5 straight losers or dogs. And even if I do lose my progression 5 times in the remainder of the season. Which is extremely unlikely. I will finish well in profit.
Let's all understand anytime we can finish a season with several hundred units more than we started with. Weve done something we are not supposed to do.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
I wish you well with your picks
I maintain that if you get to 2500 units it will be due to your picks not your glorified chase system
Nevertheless I genuinely hope you get there
Might even be worth a separate thread for your non system picks such as Burukake-thingy....
It will be due to both. As you CORRECTLY pointed out. Being good at picking winners with SLACK money management can still lead to negative figures. I got slack wth Del Potro and Gasquet a few weeks ago. I will not allow EMOTIONAL betting back into the picture again.
From now on the only way I take a blow is to lose my progression of 144. And to do that I have to do something I'm not very good at. Pick 5 straight losers or dogs. And even if I do lose my progression 5 times in the remainder of the season. Which is extremely unlikely. I will finish well in profit.
Let's all understand anytime we can finish a season with several hundred units more than we started with. Weve done something we are not supposed to do.
Hey sentinel what do you think about taking tomic over sock in Davis cup its on grass in Melbourne looks like isner will win first match so big match for tomic head to head is 3-0 to sock witch I don't like but dose tomic fit your critera? Thanks and good luck!
0
Hey sentinel what do you think about taking tomic over sock in Davis cup its on grass in Melbourne looks like isner will win first match so big match for tomic head to head is 3-0 to sock witch I don't like but dose tomic fit your critera? Thanks and good luck!
Hey sentinel what do you think about taking tomic over sock in Davis cup its on grass in Melbourne looks like isner will win first match so big match for tomic head to head is 3-0 to sock witch I don't like but dose tomic fit your critera? Thanks and good luck!
Sorry knowitall was asleep when you asked this ? Generally hard to pick between them two.
0
Quote Originally Posted by knowitall101:
Hey sentinel what do you think about taking tomic over sock in Davis cup its on grass in Melbourne looks like isner will win first match so big match for tomic head to head is 3-0 to sock witch I don't like but dose tomic fit your critera? Thanks and good luck!
Sorry knowitall was asleep when you asked this ? Generally hard to pick between them two.
Gun to your head...lisicki vs broadly..pick one. Lol :)
Well im going with Lisicki as my next bet. Doubles match has been delayed which is a nuisance. And mess up the flow of things. So ill go with Lisicki here...
0
Quote Originally Posted by bulls23:
Gun to your head...lisicki vs broadly..pick one. Lol :)
Well im going with Lisicki as my next bet. Doubles match has been delayed which is a nuisance. And mess up the flow of things. So ill go with Lisicki here...
Previous bet won by default as Sijsling retired. Some books counts that as a win so long as at least one set has been played. On others it would be a void.
0
BANKROLL=1018.36 UNITS
BET 224=A.KONTAVEIT@1.72--STAKE 1 UNIT
EVENT=WTA MONTERREY (MEXICO)
145 WINS--77 LOSSES--1 VOID
Previous bet won by default as Sijsling retired. Some books counts that as a win so long as at least one set has been played. On others it would be a void.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.