All Forums | Tennis

Querrey/Anderson line movement...

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2791
Posts: 145
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 3249
Posted: #26
Here is the live feed folks

Cheers and BOL 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 3317
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by BurningPlanet26:

you still did not refute my point at all, his bad results only came when returning from injury. just not sure how you can say this was a bad year on HCs for him when once he got healthy he was dominant. if anything I consider it a breathrough year on HC for him. and I thnk he could beat Murray on a HC, but on grass he lost 0-3. I disgaree grass is his best surface as of this moment. He is a force on HCs. to me this year he took a leap.

and of course it will be close. both guys are huge servers and bad returners. I laid the juice based on who is more clutch, homefield adnvantage and the belief that Sam will be superior in rallies. and at the parlay prices I have him now at better than even money, so I feel good about that value.

I dont often play fave moneylines alone anymore.



Well the numbers clearly show he's at his best on grass, and it was very evident watching him play that that was the case...but okay, I'll play your game.  He had one good tournament on the hard stuff.  One.  He struggled greatly before that, then he struggled again after that. 

One tournament.  An impressive tournament.  But one tournament.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #28
Not one, two, and in a row. he had two great tournaments on hard, a semi where he went three sets vs Roddick then a tournament he won right after. these were the only two tournaments he played healthy on hard this year.

so how could you say he had questionable results on hard this year? the two tournaments he played healthy in he was dominant. fact.

maybe a small sample size but you have no basis to plant the seed in people's mind that he did mediocre on hard courts this year. once healthy he did very well.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 3249
Posted: #29
not looking sharp yet
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #30
you are acting as if we should count his return from injury form as something that will count towards tonight's results and that is BS to me. I was wildly impressed by him on hard courts those two tournaments and he had good competition.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by BET_TO_WIN:

not looking sharp yet
he is not a good returner and neither is Anderson. it is not even two games in, a bit early.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 3317
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by BurningPlanet26:

Not one, two, and in a row. he had two great tournaments on hard, a semi where he went three sets vs Roddick then a tournament he won right after. these were the only two tournaments he played healthy on hard this year.

so how could you say he had questionable results on hard this year? the two tournaments he played healthy in he was dominant. fact.

maybe a small sample size but you have no basis to plant the seed in people's mind that he did mediocre on hard courts this year. once healthy he did very well.


No he wasn't, he beat Taylor Dent and Mike Russell in the first one that makes you believe he was dominant.  Sorry, those aren't big wins by any stretch of the imagination. 

And you can't ignore what he did on hard court after that, it's not like those were his last two tournaments, he lost in the second round against Isner his next time on hard court then he followed it up with a first round loss against Chardy.  How in the world is that dominant when healthy?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by BurningPlanet26:

he is not a good returner and neither is Anderson. it is not even two games in, a bit early.


BP you have been on covers long enough to know people on here expect blowouts on all bets. They want a 6-0 6-0 tennis match. They want 10 runs in the 1st inning in baseball etc. If a guy is broken his first game and they bet him, there is panic.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #34
2-2

0-30 on Anderson's serve
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by Fairweatherfan:



No he wasn't, he beat Taylor Dent and Mike Russell in the first one that makes you believe he was dominant.  Sorry, those aren't big wins by any stretch of the imagination. 

And you can't ignore what he did on hard court after that, it's not like those were his last two tournaments, he lost in the second round against Isner his next time on hard court then he followed it up with a first round loss against Chardy.  How in the world is that dominant when healthy?

the Isner loss means little as Isner is an awesome hard court player. sorry i didnt know Chardy and he played on hard, thought that one was clay! guess you got me then. but i still think even with that chardy match taken into account that is basically one bad loss all year on hard courts when healthy, and chardy is explosive as hell and a wildcard anyway. losing to Isner and Roddick is absolutely nothing to be ashamed of, they are two classes above Anderson IMO.

anderson still loses this because he is less clutch.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #36
Sam breaks. that should be the set.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 3249
Posted: #37
Go USA!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #38
if Anderson could not beat dead tired Isner how can he beat Querrey who also has a big serve and is three times better in rallies? I bet on that match and Anderson was disgusting, giving up breaks as total gifts out of nowhere to lose the first and third sets.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #39
arg just checked and broken back. shocking.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #40
I hope the crowd gets to Anderson, I think they sort of did vs Isner.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #41
well i expected tiebreaks anyway. still surprised querrey got broken back. time to turn the feed on and hope for the best.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #42
5-5 30-30 big moments
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #43
right as I tune in Sam breaks!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #44
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #45
did not expect a blowout, just a win.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #46
0-15 keep it together sam
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #47
30-40 arg

need a first serve
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #48
deuce

anderson pushes too much in rallies
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #49
amazing shot from sam to save the second break chance! anyone see it? BDTL on the run!
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 3249
Posted: #50
Just when you think Q wont get to the ball...unbelievable
All Forums | Tennis
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright � 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.