5Dimes is good if you like to play dogs. Matches are graded after 1 set. You get the benefit when a favorite loses due to injury. Which is often the case when a huge favorite does lose.
0
5Dimes is good if you like to play dogs. Matches are graded after 1 set. You get the benefit when a favorite loses due to injury. Which is often the case when a huge favorite does lose.
This exact same $50 on every +300 or more WTA strategy (removing the opponents of Serena, Azarenka and Sharapova) from the last 3 majors has netted a profit $2750. Too early to tell obviously so far on this event.
I like this idea Rzaga. I quit betting Women's tennis 2 years ago but this is very intriguing. Keep us updated on this throughout the tourney brother.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:
This exact same $50 on every +300 or more WTA strategy (removing the opponents of Serena, Azarenka and Sharapova) from the last 3 majors has netted a profit $2750. Too early to tell obviously so far on this event.
I like this idea Rzaga. I quit betting Women's tennis 2 years ago but this is very intriguing. Keep us updated on this throughout the tourney brother.
I ordinarily don't play against Azarenka but with her sporting an injury coming in she had to be included. Only Serena is off the radar for me. I don't bother betting against her. So far for this event I'm plus $1200. Added to the +$2750 for the last 3 years. It definitely works. It's proven.
0
I ordinarily don't play against Azarenka but with her sporting an injury coming in she had to be included. Only Serena is off the radar for me. I don't bother betting against her. So far for this event I'm plus $1200. Added to the +$2750 for the last 3 years. It definitely works. It's proven.
Please...what has she done since winning the Aussie open? Job in the first round in 3 straight tourneys like the piece of euro trash she is, then proceeds to tank it the fk out as a -300 fave here.
No business being a -300 to a red hot clay player in Bertens. She even said she was one foot out the door many times against her comeback rally vs Doi in the Aussie. It's called being "lucky".
0
Quote Originally Posted by GTD:
Please...what has she done since winning the Aussie open? Job in the first round in 3 straight tourneys like the piece of euro trash she is, then proceeds to tank it the fk out as a -300 fave here.
No business being a -300 to a red hot clay player in Bertens. She even said she was one foot out the door many times against her comeback rally vs Doi in the Aussie. It's called being "lucky".
Adding a male live bet to be mix. Andrej Martin live +300 vs Pouille. Pouille isn't supposed to be favored like the top 10 players are. You can't trust that guy yet.
0
Adding a male live bet to be mix. Andrej Martin live +300 vs Pouille. Pouille isn't supposed to be favored like the top 10 players are. You can't trust that guy yet.
Pouille getting smoked. What was he -800? Just silly. Let's see the guy play well for more than 2 months before lining him like he's Tsonga or Berdych or something.
0
Pouille getting smoked. What was he -800? Just silly. Let's see the guy play well for more than 2 months before lining him like he's Tsonga or Berdych or something.
Please...what has she done since winning the Aussie open? Job in the first round in 3 straight tourneys like the piece of euro trash she is, then proceeds to tank it the fk out as a -300 fave here.
You seem to struggle to understand how the WTA works. It's all about maintaining as high a ranking as possible to get good draws, therefore get easier path to go deep, hence having an easier task to earning more cash & ranking points to maintain one's high ranking. Once you've done well in a certain tournament, you have the ranking points to defend in that same tournament the next season. So naturally you'll find players get themselves up for tournaments they did well in the year before, and have less intensity for those tournaments that (1) they don't have any significant ranking points to defend in, combined with (2) involve a surface they know they're not going to play their best on.
These basic facts out of the way, you ask me what has Kerber done since she won the AO? She lost in the semi-finals at Charleston and won the final at Stuttgart, the only 2 tournaments from the AO until now that she needed to defend significant ranking points in from last year (she also won at both Charleston & Stuttgart last year). So what she's done since the AO, is all she needed to do: she didn't need to try to go deep in a bunch of other tournaments (a la Madrid & Rome), when she knows she's no a robot and doesn't have unlimited energy. She achieved between the AO & the FO exactly what her handlers would've primed herself to achieve: maintianing important ranking points. Now, she only made the 3rd round of the FO last year so she didn't have significant ranking points to defend here (esp. as those she achieved at the AO alone have set her up for the next 12-24 months, never mind those she successfully defended at Charleston & Stuttgart), and she was unlucky to draw one of the hottest players on clay (Bertens) in the 1st round. Hot opponent vs. satisfied mindset = basis for the upset that occurred.
The reason I have made this lengthy reply, is because this is a lesson that people need to be aware re WTA betting: know what tournaments the higher ranking players are defending significant ranking points in, you can be assured that those tournaments are going to get their better efforts. Lesser ranked players will generally try hard wherever they are, but the higher ranked players will have no qualms in taking tournaments off mentally (like Kerber did at Madrid and Rome).
Kerber is trash? No, she & her handlers are rather astute individuals, who know when & where she needs to perform, and are pacing her season to perfection at this point.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GTD:
Please...what has she done since winning the Aussie open? Job in the first round in 3 straight tourneys like the piece of euro trash she is, then proceeds to tank it the fk out as a -300 fave here.
You seem to struggle to understand how the WTA works. It's all about maintaining as high a ranking as possible to get good draws, therefore get easier path to go deep, hence having an easier task to earning more cash & ranking points to maintain one's high ranking. Once you've done well in a certain tournament, you have the ranking points to defend in that same tournament the next season. So naturally you'll find players get themselves up for tournaments they did well in the year before, and have less intensity for those tournaments that (1) they don't have any significant ranking points to defend in, combined with (2) involve a surface they know they're not going to play their best on.
These basic facts out of the way, you ask me what has Kerber done since she won the AO? She lost in the semi-finals at Charleston and won the final at Stuttgart, the only 2 tournaments from the AO until now that she needed to defend significant ranking points in from last year (she also won at both Charleston & Stuttgart last year). So what she's done since the AO, is all she needed to do: she didn't need to try to go deep in a bunch of other tournaments (a la Madrid & Rome), when she knows she's no a robot and doesn't have unlimited energy. She achieved between the AO & the FO exactly what her handlers would've primed herself to achieve: maintianing important ranking points. Now, she only made the 3rd round of the FO last year so she didn't have significant ranking points to defend here (esp. as those she achieved at the AO alone have set her up for the next 12-24 months, never mind those she successfully defended at Charleston & Stuttgart), and she was unlucky to draw one of the hottest players on clay (Bertens) in the 1st round. Hot opponent vs. satisfied mindset = basis for the upset that occurred.
The reason I have made this lengthy reply, is because this is a lesson that people need to be aware re WTA betting: know what tournaments the higher ranking players are defending significant ranking points in, you can be assured that those tournaments are going to get their better efforts. Lesser ranked players will generally try hard wherever they are, but the higher ranked players will have no qualms in taking tournaments off mentally (like Kerber did at Madrid and Rome).
Kerber is trash? No, she & her handlers are rather astute individuals, who know when & where she needs to perform, and are pacing her season to perfection at this point.
Typical Sloane very unreliable never understood why her prices are always so high. There trying to make her out to be the next Serena when she really isn't clearly lacks the killer instinct...
0
Typical Sloane very unreliable never understood why her prices are always so high. There trying to make her out to be the next Serena when she really isn't clearly lacks the killer instinct...
Nice call on Martin. I guess even some ATP dogs can hit.
It's rare but you only take shots against guys who aren't consistent or are way overpriced. If Martin is playing someone like Berdych, Tsonga, Ferrer, Raonic or something I don't even bother. Pouille is still an unknown. A few good results don't change the fact he can probably lose to anyone even in a major.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Choosenone21:
Nice call on Martin. I guess even some ATP dogs can hit.
It's rare but you only take shots against guys who aren't consistent or are way overpriced. If Martin is playing someone like Berdych, Tsonga, Ferrer, Raonic or something I don't even bother. Pouille is still an unknown. A few good results don't change the fact he can probably lose to anyone even in a major.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
