The Monaco boy has a wildcard to this weekends ATP Monte-Carlo Masters.
If he would tank, it would be better for him to take to 1st set...let's see adding some more at 19/1.
Preda saved 0/3 BB and Vacherot 7/8.
Also Preda to win over 4.50 games.
If he would tank, it would be better for him to take to 1st set...let's see adding some more at 19/1.
Preda saved 0/3 BB and Vacherot 7/8.
Also Preda to win over 4.50 games.
First of all tanking means to lose on purpose (because you don’t want to play etc.) - I think you mean “matchfixing” for an amateur they can seem the same - but one of them is illegal the other is frown upon but not something that is being enforced
First of all tanking means to lose on purpose (because you don’t want to play etc.) - I think you mean “matchfixing” for an amateur they can seem the same - but one of them is illegal the other is frown upon but not something that is being enforced
You literally defined both as losing on purpose: Tanking = lose on purpose, Match-fixing = lose on purpose. The only difference you’re hinting at is motive—like match-fixing involves money while tanking might not. But let’s not be naive here: match-fixing happens in tennis daily, and it’s impossible to prove. The line between the two is blurry at best.
Preda to win over 4.50 games
You literally defined both as losing on purpose: Tanking = lose on purpose, Match-fixing = lose on purpose. The only difference you’re hinting at is motive—like match-fixing involves money while tanking might not. But let’s not be naive here: match-fixing happens in tennis daily, and it’s impossible to prove. The line between the two is blurry at best.
Preda to win over 4.50 games
If they were the same both of them would either be illegal or not - they aren’t so they are not the same end of story - and nice hit what was that odds -200 ?
If they were the same both of them would either be illegal or not - they aren’t so they are not the same end of story - and nice hit what was that odds -200 ?
And what would be the advantage of losing the first set on purpose if you wanted to lose on purpose because you didn’t want to play the match - your argument only makes sense if they wanted to profit from it
And what would be the advantage of losing the first set on purpose if you wanted to lose on purpose because you didn’t want to play the match - your argument only makes sense if they wanted to profit from it
He did his best faced 13 breack chances against a 1000 ranked player.
He only faced 2 against Basilashvili in 3 sets.
he gave the kid all chances to win that game
He did his best faced 13 breack chances against a 1000 ranked player.
He only faced 2 against Basilashvili in 3 sets.
he gave the kid all chances to win that game
No way in hell you got that at 9/5 for him just winning 3 games in the 2set
No way in hell you got that at 9/5 for him just winning 3 games in the 2set
It would not be a surprise when it comes to Vacherot who lost lost week 1st round against a 700 ranked player in straight sets, that same player lost 6-0 in his last game, so a pretty shiitty player to lose in straight against as a 1.10 favorite.
It would not be a surprise when it comes to Vacherot who lost lost week 1st round against a 700 ranked player in straight sets, that same player lost 6-0 in his last game, so a pretty shiitty player to lose in straight against as a 1.10 favorite.
At that time he had won 6 straight games, had broken him 3 straight games and started to serve in the 2nd so only needed 2 breaks in the 2nd.
Sorry you missed it
At that time he had won 6 straight games, had broken him 3 straight games and started to serve in the 2nd so only needed 2 breaks in the 2nd.
Sorry you missed it
We leave IW and Miami after 2 profitable weeks, no time for Clay season!
Recap from yesterday
Pred ML
Preda to win over 4.50 games
Klizan live 2/1
Skatov + Cerundolo J
Begu + van de Zandsculp
Garin + Etcheverry
Hijkata/Thompson + Galloway/Withrow
We leave IW and Miami after 2 profitable weeks, no time for Clay season!
Recap from yesterday
Pred ML
Preda to win over 4.50 games
Klizan live 2/1
Skatov + Cerundolo J
Begu + van de Zandsculp
Garin + Etcheverry
Hijkata/Thompson + Galloway/Withrow
Adding
Harrison/king + McDonald/Michelsen
Harrison/King have been great this year.
Dallas: Winner
Delray: Final
Acapulco: Winner
Indian Wells: Semi-final
Miami: Quarter-final
I think the fast surface will favour them as well, they playing Seggerman R. / Trhac P who is 2-5 in their last 7 matches and 1-1 this year. They are better on clay than Harrison/king who haven't played any clay matches together, but with this surface I have to go with King and Harrison.
McDonald/Michelsen have had some really good double wins in the past years winning over some top 10 players. Michelsen looks really good yesterday and same here with the quick surface would favor them here.
Adding
Harrison/king + McDonald/Michelsen
Harrison/King have been great this year.
Dallas: Winner
Delray: Final
Acapulco: Winner
Indian Wells: Semi-final
Miami: Quarter-final
I think the fast surface will favour them as well, they playing Seggerman R. / Trhac P who is 2-5 in their last 7 matches and 1-1 this year. They are better on clay than Harrison/king who haven't played any clay matches together, but with this surface I have to go with King and Harrison.
McDonald/Michelsen have had some really good double wins in the past years winning over some top 10 players. Michelsen looks really good yesterday and same here with the quick surface would favor them here.
suprised Walton is a dog here, probably because he never plays on clay but with these fast courts he should be favourite.
suprised Walton is a dog here, probably because he never plays on clay but with these fast courts he should be favourite.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.