Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested.
Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment.
Lots of good dog plays today imo gents.
Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried...
Anyways, BOL as always gents & lets cash em!!!
LOL
0
Play 1: Koepfer ML +176, 0.25% BR invested.
Play 2: Jung ML @-113, 0.33% BR invested.
Play 3: Nishioka ML @+144, 0.25% BR invested.
Play 4: Bagnis ML @+221, 0.25% BR invested.
Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested.
Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment.
Lots of good dog plays today imo gents.
Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried...
Play 1: Koepfer ML +176, 0.25% BR invested. Play 2: Jung ML @-113, 0.33% BR invested. Play 3: Nishioka ML @+144, 0.25% BR invested. Play 4: Bagnis ML @+221, 0.25% BR invested. Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested. Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment. Lots of good dog plays today imo gents. Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried... Anyways, BOL as always gents & lets cash em!!! LOL
So if your bankroll is $1000 you wagered and lost a whole $2.50 on Koepfer? Why even bother? Even if you went on a tear and went 4-0 or 5-0 your profits would be what a whole $10? With this nitty bankroll strategy I sincerely doubt you are making “good profits”
0
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Play 1: Koepfer ML +176, 0.25% BR invested. Play 2: Jung ML @-113, 0.33% BR invested. Play 3: Nishioka ML @+144, 0.25% BR invested. Play 4: Bagnis ML @+221, 0.25% BR invested. Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested. Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment. Lots of good dog plays today imo gents. Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried... Anyways, BOL as always gents & lets cash em!!! LOL
So if your bankroll is $1000 you wagered and lost a whole $2.50 on Koepfer? Why even bother? Even if you went on a tear and went 4-0 or 5-0 your profits would be what a whole $10? With this nitty bankroll strategy I sincerely doubt you are making “good profits”
Play 1: Koepfer ML +176, 0.25% BR invested. Play 2: Jung ML @-113, 0.33% BR invested. Play 3: Nishioka ML @+144, 0.25% BR invested. Play 4: Bagnis ML @+221, 0.25% BR invested. Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested. Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment. Lots of good dog plays today imo gents. Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried... Anyways, BOL as always gents & lets cash em!!! LOL
So if your bankroll is $1000 you wagered and lost a whole $2.50 on Koepfer? Why even bother? Even if you went on a tear and went 4-0 or 5-0 your profits would be what a whole $10? With this nitty bankroll strategy I sincerely doubt you are making “good profits”
You're absolutely right!
Thats why the majority of punters lose money in the long run.
But you failed to realize I make majority of my profits during ingame wagering.
I average 3-5% Roi daily on a constant basis.
I take these Pregamers every once in awhile to give myself a break from the grind of ingame stress.
And yes, I wager low % on Pregamers, because its an absolute stjpidity to go large on pregames if you take into account for long term profitability.
You can doubt all you want, but I make myself money my friend..
lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook:
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Play 1: Koepfer ML +176, 0.25% BR invested. Play 2: Jung ML @-113, 0.33% BR invested. Play 3: Nishioka ML @+144, 0.25% BR invested. Play 4: Bagnis ML @+221, 0.25% BR invested. Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested. Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment. Lots of good dog plays today imo gents. Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried... Anyways, BOL as always gents & lets cash em!!! LOL
So if your bankroll is $1000 you wagered and lost a whole $2.50 on Koepfer? Why even bother? Even if you went on a tear and went 4-0 or 5-0 your profits would be what a whole $10? With this nitty bankroll strategy I sincerely doubt you are making “good profits”
You're absolutely right!
Thats why the majority of punters lose money in the long run.
But you failed to realize I make majority of my profits during ingame wagering.
I average 3-5% Roi daily on a constant basis.
I take these Pregamers every once in awhile to give myself a break from the grind of ingame stress.
And yes, I wager low % on Pregamers, because its an absolute stjpidity to go large on pregames if you take into account for long term profitability.
You can doubt all you want, but I make myself money my friend..
Play 1: Koepfer ML +176, 0.25% BR invested. Play 2: Jung ML @-113, 0.33% BR invested. Play 3: Nishioka ML @+144, 0.25% BR invested. Play 4: Bagnis ML @+221, 0.25% BR invested. Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested. Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment. Lots of good dog plays today imo gents. Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried... Anyways, BOL as always gents & lets cash em!!! LOL
So if your bankroll is $1000 you wagered and lost a whole $2.50 on Koepfer? Why even bother? Even if you went on a tear and went 4-0 or 5-0 your profits would be what a whole $10? With this nitty bankroll strategy I sincerely doubt you are making “good profits”
No direspect meant here but this statement is filled with ignorance. This strategy is pretty much the only way one will make good profits over the long term. I assume you're new to this racket and the concept of money mgt so no harm meant. Best wishes with all your wagering
0
Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook:
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Play 1: Koepfer ML +176, 0.25% BR invested. Play 2: Jung ML @-113, 0.33% BR invested. Play 3: Nishioka ML @+144, 0.25% BR invested. Play 4: Bagnis ML @+221, 0.25% BR invested. Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested. Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment. Lots of good dog plays today imo gents. Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried... Anyways, BOL as always gents & lets cash em!!! LOL
So if your bankroll is $1000 you wagered and lost a whole $2.50 on Koepfer? Why even bother? Even if you went on a tear and went 4-0 or 5-0 your profits would be what a whole $10? With this nitty bankroll strategy I sincerely doubt you are making “good profits”
No direspect meant here but this statement is filled with ignorance. This strategy is pretty much the only way one will make good profits over the long term. I assume you're new to this racket and the concept of money mgt so no harm meant. Best wishes with all your wagering
Play 1: Koepfer ML +176, 0.25% BR invested. Play 2: Jung ML @-113, 0.33% BR invested. Play 3: Nishioka ML @+144, 0.25% BR invested. Play 4: Bagnis ML @+221, 0.25% BR invested. Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested. Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment. Lots of good dog plays today imo gents. Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried... Anyways, BOL as always gents & lets cash em!!! LOL
So if your bankroll is $1000 you wagered and lost a whole $2.50 on Koepfer? Why even bother? Even if you went on a tear and went 4-0 or 5-0 your profits would be what a whole $10? With this nitty bankroll strategy I sincerely doubt you are making “good profits”
I'll give you an example:
A BR of $3000 with a daily roi of +1.1% over 44 weeks = Over $100,000 at a compounded rate.
Thats only $11 the first day if you start with a $1000 BR.
And thats easy to make in ingames for me.
It really does take a math genius to win in this game in the long run, and yes, I'm not being conceited but I consider myself one of tbe best with numbers... lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook:
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Play 1: Koepfer ML +176, 0.25% BR invested. Play 2: Jung ML @-113, 0.33% BR invested. Play 3: Nishioka ML @+144, 0.25% BR invested. Play 4: Bagnis ML @+221, 0.25% BR invested. Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested. Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment. Lots of good dog plays today imo gents. Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried... Anyways, BOL as always gents & lets cash em!!! LOL
So if your bankroll is $1000 you wagered and lost a whole $2.50 on Koepfer? Why even bother? Even if you went on a tear and went 4-0 or 5-0 your profits would be what a whole $10? With this nitty bankroll strategy I sincerely doubt you are making “good profits”
I'll give you an example:
A BR of $3000 with a daily roi of +1.1% over 44 weeks = Over $100,000 at a compounded rate.
Thats only $11 the first day if you start with a $1000 BR.
And thats easy to make in ingames for me.
It really does take a math genius to win in this game in the long run, and yes, I'm not being conceited but I consider myself one of tbe best with numbers... lol
And take into account the power of compounding. When your BR goes up to $5000, your daiky 1.1% roi is now at $55. And you go on, keep compiunding. Anyways, I'm not here to give out advice on my strategy. That'll take about 10 full hours in face to face time. Anyways, BOL to you. Its not good to be ignorant. There are ppl like myself that treat this as a valuable long term investment, rather than treat it as a one & done, do or die kind of gambling....
Best bankroll management Tanis. Need to learn from you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
And take into account the power of compounding. When your BR goes up to $5000, your daiky 1.1% roi is now at $55. And you go on, keep compiunding. Anyways, I'm not here to give out advice on my strategy. That'll take about 10 full hours in face to face time. Anyways, BOL to you. Its not good to be ignorant. There are ppl like myself that treat this as a valuable long term investment, rather than treat it as a one & done, do or die kind of gambling....
Best bankroll management Tanis. Need to learn from you.
And take into account the power of compounding. When your BR goes up to $5000, your daiky 1.1% roi is now at $55. And you go on, keep compiunding. Anyways, I'm not here to give out advice on my strategy. That'll take about 10 full hours in face to face time. Anyways, BOL to you. Its not good to be ignorant. There are ppl like myself that treat this as a valuable long term investment, rather than treat it as a one & done, do or die kind of gambling....
Best bankroll management Tanis. Need to learn from you.
One of these days, I'll write a brief, compacted strategy on ingame compounding BR strategy my friend. :))
0
Quote Originally Posted by SportsBettor13:
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
And take into account the power of compounding. When your BR goes up to $5000, your daiky 1.1% roi is now at $55. And you go on, keep compiunding. Anyways, I'm not here to give out advice on my strategy. That'll take about 10 full hours in face to face time. Anyways, BOL to you. Its not good to be ignorant. There are ppl like myself that treat this as a valuable long term investment, rather than treat it as a one & done, do or die kind of gambling....
Best bankroll management Tanis. Need to learn from you.
One of these days, I'll write a brief, compacted strategy on ingame compounding BR strategy my friend. :))
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks.
In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
0
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks.
In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
Your constant mention of $1000 BR speaks volumes is great stuff.
Not sure how old you are but I hope you one day are able to add at least 1 zero on your bankroll. Go get em kid.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook:
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
Your constant mention of $1000 BR speaks volumes is great stuff.
Not sure how old you are but I hope you one day are able to add at least 1 zero on your bankroll. Go get em kid.
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
I dont know why I'm wasting my time wih you on this subject matter, but since I have some free time atm(just had lunch), I'll teach you some numbers.
It is not the book that offers the compound interest like a bank. It is you, that needs to make it happen.
Lets say I am wagering 3% of my BR during ingame on a short odds match that has a 95%+ probabilityto win at the short odds offeredof lets say -600.
Since you keep mentioning your $1000, Injust wagered $30(3%) to win $6, which is 0.6% of your BR. Lets say tou win 2 of those a day, your roi is 1.2% roi.
Keep compounding that 3% wager, and with a BR amount of lets say $5000, your 3% wager is now $150 to win $30 at the odds of lets say -500 again...
Anyways, I feel like a math teacher talking to a kindergartener on math basics...
No offense to you my friend, I wil leave this matter a where is now cuz what am I gaining from this, trying t give you the basics of number crnching to you....
0
Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook:
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
I dont know why I'm wasting my time wih you on this subject matter, but since I have some free time atm(just had lunch), I'll teach you some numbers.
It is not the book that offers the compound interest like a bank. It is you, that needs to make it happen.
Lets say I am wagering 3% of my BR during ingame on a short odds match that has a 95%+ probabilityto win at the short odds offeredof lets say -600.
Since you keep mentioning your $1000, Injust wagered $30(3%) to win $6, which is 0.6% of your BR. Lets say tou win 2 of those a day, your roi is 1.2% roi.
Keep compounding that 3% wager, and with a BR amount of lets say $5000, your 3% wager is now $150 to win $30 at the odds of lets say -500 again...
Anyways, I feel like a math teacher talking to a kindergartener on math basics...
No offense to you my friend, I wil leave this matter a where is now cuz what am I gaining from this, trying t give you the basics of number crnching to you....
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
Your constant mention of $1000 BR speaks volumes is great stuff. Not sure how old you are but I hope you one day are able to add at least 1 zero on your bankroll. Go get em kid.
And no, my BR is not $1000... lol
If you have a BR of 100k, that 1% daily roi is $1000 my friend...
You decide if you want to take that profit out daily, weekly, monthly, or keep compoundig it. .
LOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by Turkduffin:
Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook:
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
Your constant mention of $1000 BR speaks volumes is great stuff. Not sure how old you are but I hope you one day are able to add at least 1 zero on your bankroll. Go get em kid.
And no, my BR is not $1000... lol
If you have a BR of 100k, that 1% daily roi is $1000 my friend...
You decide if you want to take that profit out daily, weekly, monthly, or keep compoundig it. .
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
Your constant mention of $1000 BR speaks volumes is great stuff. Not sure how old you are but I hope you one day are able to add at least 1 zero on your bankroll. Go get em kid.
$1000 was just an example to give perspective so that the low IQ individuals like yourself can follow along. Yes that speaks volumes about me . I must be some broke kid because I used an example of a $1000 bankroll. Stop being dumb . If you ever get summoned for jury duty tell them you can’t because you’re too stupid.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Turkduffin:
Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook:
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
Your constant mention of $1000 BR speaks volumes is great stuff. Not sure how old you are but I hope you one day are able to add at least 1 zero on your bankroll. Go get em kid.
$1000 was just an example to give perspective so that the low IQ individuals like yourself can follow along. Yes that speaks volumes about me . I must be some broke kid because I used an example of a $1000 bankroll. Stop being dumb . If you ever get summoned for jury duty tell them you can’t because you’re too stupid.
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
Your constant mention of $1000 BR speaks volumes is great stuff. Not sure how old you are but I hope you one day are able to add at least 1 zero on your bankroll. Go get em kid.
And no, my BR is not $1000... lol If you have a BR of 100k, that 1% daily roi is $1000 my friend... You decide if you want to take that profit out daily, weekly, monthly, or keep compoundig it. . LOL
So with a bankroll of $100k your might lay out about $1000 -$1250 a day in sports plays. So that means about $99k is left collecting dust each day at the sports book?
Thats not a very sound investment strategy my friend.
Well sounds like you are doing great. Keep rolling in all them profits lol.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Quote Originally Posted by Turkduffin:
Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook:
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
Your constant mention of $1000 BR speaks volumes is great stuff. Not sure how old you are but I hope you one day are able to add at least 1 zero on your bankroll. Go get em kid.
And no, my BR is not $1000... lol If you have a BR of 100k, that 1% daily roi is $1000 my friend... You decide if you want to take that profit out daily, weekly, monthly, or keep compoundig it. . LOL
So with a bankroll of $100k your might lay out about $1000 -$1250 a day in sports plays. So that means about $99k is left collecting dust each day at the sports book?
Thats not a very sound investment strategy my friend.
Well sounds like you are doing great. Keep rolling in all them profits lol.
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
I dont know why I'm wasting my time wih you on this subject matter, but since I have some free time atm(just had lunch), I'll teach you some numbers. It is not the book that offers the compound interest like a bank. It is you, that needs to make it happen. Lets say I am wagering 3% of my BR during ingame on a short odds match that has a 95%+ probabilityto win at the short odds offeredof lets say -600. Since you keep mentioning your $1000, Injust wagered $30(3%) to win $6, which is 0.6% of your BR. Lets say tou win 2 of those a day, your roi is 1.2% roi. Keep compounding that 3% wager, and with a BR amount of lets say $5000, your 3% wager is now $150 to win $30 at the odds of lets say -500 again... Anyways, I feel like a math teacher talking to a kindergartener on math basics... No offense to you my friend, I wil leave this matter a where is now cuz what am I gaining from this, trying t give you the basics of number crnching to you....
Yes so by that logic you are accumulating more and more bankroll and leaving more and more dead money with the books . You are not very smart so thank you for the education but you are being dishonest and a bit retarded sorry to say so pleAse stay in school . Let me know when you graduate from HS I’ll send you a card with a bengi so you can put in tennis plays with that for 6 months. Complete nitwit .
0
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook:
I don’t need math lessons I know how compounding works. You can fluff up those numbers all you want but you’re making a massive assumption that you earn 1.1% each day on your plays which you don’t. And books don’t offer compounding interest on your running balance they are bookies not banks. In short compounding is “not a thing” when it comes to gambling so your whole bankroll strategy is misguided or “ignorant” as you would say. I didn’t mean to get all you worked up. If your strategy works for you knock yourself out but if I have a $1000 bankroll and win $2 on the day I’m not exactly getting all giddy like you .
I dont know why I'm wasting my time wih you on this subject matter, but since I have some free time atm(just had lunch), I'll teach you some numbers. It is not the book that offers the compound interest like a bank. It is you, that needs to make it happen. Lets say I am wagering 3% of my BR during ingame on a short odds match that has a 95%+ probabilityto win at the short odds offeredof lets say -600. Since you keep mentioning your $1000, Injust wagered $30(3%) to win $6, which is 0.6% of your BR. Lets say tou win 2 of those a day, your roi is 1.2% roi. Keep compounding that 3% wager, and with a BR amount of lets say $5000, your 3% wager is now $150 to win $30 at the odds of lets say -500 again... Anyways, I feel like a math teacher talking to a kindergartener on math basics... No offense to you my friend, I wil leave this matter a where is now cuz what am I gaining from this, trying t give you the basics of number crnching to you....
Yes so by that logic you are accumulating more and more bankroll and leaving more and more dead money with the books . You are not very smart so thank you for the education but you are being dishonest and a bit retarded sorry to say so pleAse stay in school . Let me know when you graduate from HS I’ll send you a card with a bengi so you can put in tennis plays with that for 6 months. Complete nitwit .
Play 1: Koepfer ML +176, 0.25% BR invested. Play 2: Jung ML @-113, 0.33% BR invested. Play 3: Nishioka ML @+144, 0.25% BR invested. Play 4: Bagnis ML @+221, 0.25% BR invested. Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested. Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment. Lots of good dog plays today imo gents. Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried... Anyways, BOL as always gents & lets cash em!!! LOL
So if your bankroll is $1000 you wagered and lost a whole $2.50 on Koepfer? Why even bother? Even if you went on a tear and went 4-0 or 5-0 your profits would be what a whole $10? With this nitty bankroll strategy I sincerely doubt you are making “good profits”
You're absolutely right! Thats why the majority of punters lose money in the long run. But you failed to realize I make majority of my profits during ingame wagering. I average 3-5% Roi daily on a constant basis. I take these Pregamers every once in awhile to give myself a break from the grind of ingame stress. And yes, I wager low % on Pregamers, because its an absolute stjpidity to go large on pregames if you take into account for long term profitability. You can doubt all you want, but I make myself money my friend.. lol
Why don't you post some of your ingame wagering if you are consistently making 3-5%?
0
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook:
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Play 1: Koepfer ML +176, 0.25% BR invested. Play 2: Jung ML @-113, 0.33% BR invested. Play 3: Nishioka ML @+144, 0.25% BR invested. Play 4: Bagnis ML @+221, 0.25% BR invested. Strong Play of the Day(NCAAB): Colorado +4.5 @-110 vs Oregon at 1800 hrs, 1.1% BR invested. Possible Play(undecided, might take if odds drop to -2 at around -110): Isner -1.5 @-124, 0.25% possible BR investment. Lots of good dog plays today imo gents. Looking forward to some Pregame profits as I plan to take the day off from the stressful ingame trading as I've made some really good profits recently at the expense of my brain being fried... Anyways, BOL as always gents & lets cash em!!! LOL
So if your bankroll is $1000 you wagered and lost a whole $2.50 on Koepfer? Why even bother? Even if you went on a tear and went 4-0 or 5-0 your profits would be what a whole $10? With this nitty bankroll strategy I sincerely doubt you are making “good profits”
You're absolutely right! Thats why the majority of punters lose money in the long run. But you failed to realize I make majority of my profits during ingame wagering. I average 3-5% Roi daily on a constant basis. I take these Pregamers every once in awhile to give myself a break from the grind of ingame stress. And yes, I wager low % on Pregamers, because its an absolute stjpidity to go large on pregames if you take into account for long term profitability. You can doubt all you want, but I make myself money my friend.. lol
Why don't you post some of your ingame wagering if you are consistently making 3-5%?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.