You posted the +700 and the +1200. That averages to +950. You lost your Murray future and yesterday you said you hedged on Nadal, again another awful move considering it was supposed to rain and Nadal's price was always going to go down so you lost at least 50 cents on the Nadal hedge as well... That means you are down to small profit, still good not saying otherwise, but nothing like you are trying to sell here, and nothing good enough to bump a 2 months ago thread. Believe me, nobody is missing you. Only morons got Djokovic at +700 and you are one of them, his price doubled the week before US Open.
You claim to be the best capper on Covers but you still fail to understand that recent form is the most important aspect in Tennis and you are so stupid that maybe after the US Open finishes you will bet the Australian Open 2011 winner and if that bet somehow hits you will be bragging about it while nobody with some intelligence would.
You tell BP that he should "respect remarkable capping here." while in the first post you say "Djocko is just a big hunch I have..I have already played on the +700. I
think this price will go down. Anyway wanting to fade me here I won't
try to hard to sway you."
When did a big hunch started to qualify as remarkable capping?!
How come you didn't bump that going away present thread or whatever it was where you lost a -250? Oh that's right, it lost, so it doesn't count, what a stupid question this was from me.
i bumped that thread...too bad he didnt came to say thanks
0
Quote Originally Posted by TennisCapper:
You never posted the +1400
You posted the +700 and the +1200. That averages to +950. You lost your Murray future and yesterday you said you hedged on Nadal, again another awful move considering it was supposed to rain and Nadal's price was always going to go down so you lost at least 50 cents on the Nadal hedge as well... That means you are down to small profit, still good not saying otherwise, but nothing like you are trying to sell here, and nothing good enough to bump a 2 months ago thread. Believe me, nobody is missing you. Only morons got Djokovic at +700 and you are one of them, his price doubled the week before US Open.
You claim to be the best capper on Covers but you still fail to understand that recent form is the most important aspect in Tennis and you are so stupid that maybe after the US Open finishes you will bet the Australian Open 2011 winner and if that bet somehow hits you will be bragging about it while nobody with some intelligence would.
You tell BP that he should "respect remarkable capping here." while in the first post you say "Djocko is just a big hunch I have..I have already played on the +700. I
think this price will go down. Anyway wanting to fade me here I won't
try to hard to sway you."
When did a big hunch started to qualify as remarkable capping?!
How come you didn't bump that going away present thread or whatever it was where you lost a -250? Oh that's right, it lost, so it doesn't count, what a stupid question this was from me.
i bumped that thread...too bad he didnt came to say thanks
Tennisknobend when you can cap like me please come back to me. 4 yes 4 pre tourney picks in a row have come in. It's clearly obvious the haters are jealous. Why can you show some class and say awesome job picking @+1200 dog. I played @+700, +1200 and +1400 e/w and hedged big on Rafa yesterday. I cleaned up. I mean CLEANED UP..
It's jealously. Its OUTSTANDING capping. I know it, you know it, everyone knows it. Show me another capper thats hit like me on this forum. What one bet wrong out of what 9 or 10 posted plays. 4 yes 4 pre tourney picks in a row hit for lovely prices. Thats a gift so matter what u jealous clowns say. I will keep making the money and laugh at losers like you. My picks are a loss to the forum. You retards are just too stupid to realise it.
"Cause I'm a creep, cause I'm a winner,
What the hell am I doing here. I don't belong here"
0
Tennisknobend when you can cap like me please come back to me. 4 yes 4 pre tourney picks in a row have come in. It's clearly obvious the haters are jealous. Why can you show some class and say awesome job picking @+1200 dog. I played @+700, +1200 and +1400 e/w and hedged big on Rafa yesterday. I cleaned up. I mean CLEANED UP..
It's jealously. Its OUTSTANDING capping. I know it, you know it, everyone knows it. Show me another capper thats hit like me on this forum. What one bet wrong out of what 9 or 10 posted plays. 4 yes 4 pre tourney picks in a row hit for lovely prices. Thats a gift so matter what u jealous clowns say. I will keep making the money and laugh at losers like you. My picks are a loss to the forum. You retards are just too stupid to realise it.
"Cause I'm a creep, cause I'm a winner,
What the hell am I doing here. I don't belong here"
Burning I am not coming back so its not promise broken, inside of hating you should respect remarkable capping here. People should be begging to come back. HELLO! That's 4, yes 4!! pre tourney backs in a row all in the + coming in. Thats simply incredible. I say I have a huge Hunch on a +1400 and it hits. Are u kidding me!?
Nadal rolls today. Djoko too tired..I have hedged huge, either way I am laughing
I am very glad to hear that you are going to keep your word and leave again. I always thought it was cool that you actually left when you made such a HUGE deal out of "if I lose this Murray -200 bet vs Fish I will leave forever" since you were so sure and turned out incorrect. If you came back all that bravado would count for nothing since we all know you would just come back anyway, and are a damned liar.
So it is nice to hear that you are sticking to your original promise. We will see.
If I stated that losing a bet meant I would leave the forum I would actually do it. That is why I do not state such things. I bet on Murray so it would be a win win for me and lost money on your pick. But that is fine because I knew you would not be stirring stuff up around here anymore, so the financial loss of following your pick did not sting much. Don't tell me I wasted my dough bro!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
Burning I am not coming back so its not promise broken, inside of hating you should respect remarkable capping here. People should be begging to come back. HELLO! That's 4, yes 4!! pre tourney backs in a row all in the + coming in. Thats simply incredible. I say I have a huge Hunch on a +1400 and it hits. Are u kidding me!?
Nadal rolls today. Djoko too tired..I have hedged huge, either way I am laughing
I am very glad to hear that you are going to keep your word and leave again. I always thought it was cool that you actually left when you made such a HUGE deal out of "if I lose this Murray -200 bet vs Fish I will leave forever" since you were so sure and turned out incorrect. If you came back all that bravado would count for nothing since we all know you would just come back anyway, and are a damned liar.
So it is nice to hear that you are sticking to your original promise. We will see.
If I stated that losing a bet meant I would leave the forum I would actually do it. That is why I do not state such things. I bet on Murray so it would be a win win for me and lost money on your pick. But that is fine because I knew you would not be stirring stuff up around here anymore, so the financial loss of following your pick did not sting much. Don't tell me I wasted my dough bro!
We all knew Nadal was almost definitely going to win. The question was more whether or not Djoker could give him a match. The future was insurance you never needed... Djokovic had to max out to even hit the over!
0
We all knew Nadal was almost definitely going to win. The question was more whether or not Djoker could give him a match. The future was insurance you never needed... Djokovic had to max out to even hit the over!
I remember when you laid big juice on Fed not to win the US Open and it came down to him in the final vs Del Potro and a massive choke by Fed to lose... you needed a +350 to hit at the last stage to win that won. I watched that match with money on both in a futures bet and thought Del Potro got lucky as shit. That was absolutely not an impressive futures pick as I explained many times......
You have to be a huge attention person who talks a lot of shit and promotes himself in totally annoying fashion for people to want you gone despite acknowledging that you might be good. Quite a feat.
0
I remember when you laid big juice on Fed not to win the US Open and it came down to him in the final vs Del Potro and a massive choke by Fed to lose... you needed a +350 to hit at the last stage to win that won. I watched that match with money on both in a futures bet and thought Del Potro got lucky as shit. That was absolutely not an impressive futures pick as I explained many times......
You have to be a huge attention person who talks a lot of shit and promotes himself in totally annoying fashion for people to want you gone despite acknowledging that you might be good. Quite a feat.
anyway what is the point bro, we all know you only cap slams and the tournaments preceding them...
You have nothing to offer until February 2011 anyway. You must be pretty bored to come here. I am shocked no one has bumped your Fish and Murray thread yet but I am sure it is coming.
Now the front page is filled with Mack threads again cluttering up the threads talking about actual matches going on. What an eyesore.
You need more than 10 picks to get my respect that is for damned sure., And I still remember you being strong on Kvitova and Serena going under in Wimbledon when she lead in the first set by a break for most of it and took Serena to a tiebreak as a mega dog. Then the Murray Fish thing where you talked about what a great price -220 was when it got pounded down 60 points. One of your wins was lucky, you do have a few losses, you are not perfect, and you have only posted a handful of picks.
You have not proven much of anything with this small sample size and futures bets are a waste of time anyway because most of the time you make more investing in your player match by match unless you expect them to get a total cake draw as the faves all get upset along the way.
Lots of guys start out on here and hit 8 of 10, 16 of 20, but I have never seen one fill the forum with their posts and ego. Doing that would be annoying by anyone and anyway it is too small of a sample size to draw conclusions. That would be like saying Agnes Szavay is going to dominate the WTA simply because she won two tournaments in a row not long ago. Twelve matches is not enough and neither is twelve picks.
And by coming back you prove yourself a liar to boot so how can we believe your claims? What else have you lied about?
OK that is all the time I am putting into the charade. If there were three of you here I would quit the forum because all the self masturbation is highly annoying and honestly I do not think you know as much about tennis as you think you do. Sometimes I read your cases and even though the pick was a winner found your reasoning behind a pick very unconvincing. You may have skills in general but you need to watch the sport more IMHO to become as good as you think you are already.
Get some fucking humility.
0
anyway what is the point bro, we all know you only cap slams and the tournaments preceding them...
You have nothing to offer until February 2011 anyway. You must be pretty bored to come here. I am shocked no one has bumped your Fish and Murray thread yet but I am sure it is coming.
Now the front page is filled with Mack threads again cluttering up the threads talking about actual matches going on. What an eyesore.
You need more than 10 picks to get my respect that is for damned sure., And I still remember you being strong on Kvitova and Serena going under in Wimbledon when she lead in the first set by a break for most of it and took Serena to a tiebreak as a mega dog. Then the Murray Fish thing where you talked about what a great price -220 was when it got pounded down 60 points. One of your wins was lucky, you do have a few losses, you are not perfect, and you have only posted a handful of picks.
You have not proven much of anything with this small sample size and futures bets are a waste of time anyway because most of the time you make more investing in your player match by match unless you expect them to get a total cake draw as the faves all get upset along the way.
Lots of guys start out on here and hit 8 of 10, 16 of 20, but I have never seen one fill the forum with their posts and ego. Doing that would be annoying by anyone and anyway it is too small of a sample size to draw conclusions. That would be like saying Agnes Szavay is going to dominate the WTA simply because she won two tournaments in a row not long ago. Twelve matches is not enough and neither is twelve picks.
And by coming back you prove yourself a liar to boot so how can we believe your claims? What else have you lied about?
OK that is all the time I am putting into the charade. If there were three of you here I would quit the forum because all the self masturbation is highly annoying and honestly I do not think you know as much about tennis as you think you do. Sometimes I read your cases and even though the pick was a winner found your reasoning behind a pick very unconvincing. You may have skills in general but you need to watch the sport more IMHO to become as good as you think you are already.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.