Well again 3-3 makes for a rough start too the week and at 6-6 overall. On to Day 3 .
R. Schuettler -218 over Sela- Schuettler lost last year at Wimbledon to Nadal in Semifinals here, with points to defend you expect him to come out motivated and focused to take on Sela. However, Sela is ahead all time H2H 2-0 with one of those wins coming this year at the Australian Open in 4 sets. The difference is this, Schuettler is a little more suited for grass as his 33-24 record shows on grass 7-3 in last 10 and 16-8 overall at Wimbledon vs a 4-9 overall grass record for Sela. Schuettler has a big first serve and is solid from behind the baseline, he is not the most agile guy in the world which is where Sela has a slight advantage. The weakness in Sela's game is that his serve can leave him at times and that will tend to create openings for Bp's. Schuettler will take this in 4.
A. Pavlyuchenkova -161 over Vinci- The up and comer Pavlychenkova should be able to take out the elder Vinci. Both players have had success on grass but in her short career at Wimbledon Pavlyuchenkova has made the round of 32 here last yea and shown the tools to go deeper here in the draw. With a good serve and solid opening round win 6-2 6-2 over Petra Cetkovska, Vinci is not without weapons herself as she has a good serve and managed to take out Rybarkova who won a grass warmup to Wimbledon. Palyuchenkova to get through in 3 is my predicition largely based on confidence and the fact she did so well here last year.
Urzela Radwanska -105 vs D. Cibulkova- Radwanksa has a nice serve and plays an aggresive style suited for faster surfaces Cibulkova is 1-4 on grass and prefers playing more on Clay. Radwanska at 8-4 on grass has shown a bit of success on this surface. Expecting Radwanksa in 3 to move on.
4th match that is more of a personal play then anything else.
Jie Zheng -119 over Hantuchova- Hantuchova has a really good serve and a very good career record on grass, Hantuchova struggled with the young Robson in the 1st round where Zheng won in 2 tie breaks vs a good player in Barrios who is a scrappy type player. I think Zheng who has a great overall game will be able to dictate alot of points on Hantuchova's 2nd serve as she is a gifted returner and has a pretty decent serve herself. If Hantuchova is able to land alot of 1st serves in it will be alot tighter match as she relies heavily on her big 1st serve, if that percentage is around 50-60% as opposed to high 70-80% range then this could be straights for Zheng
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Well again 3-3 makes for a rough start too the week and at 6-6 overall. On to Day 3 .
R. Schuettler -218 over Sela- Schuettler lost last year at Wimbledon to Nadal in Semifinals here, with points to defend you expect him to come out motivated and focused to take on Sela. However, Sela is ahead all time H2H 2-0 with one of those wins coming this year at the Australian Open in 4 sets. The difference is this, Schuettler is a little more suited for grass as his 33-24 record shows on grass 7-3 in last 10 and 16-8 overall at Wimbledon vs a 4-9 overall grass record for Sela. Schuettler has a big first serve and is solid from behind the baseline, he is not the most agile guy in the world which is where Sela has a slight advantage. The weakness in Sela's game is that his serve can leave him at times and that will tend to create openings for Bp's. Schuettler will take this in 4.
A. Pavlyuchenkova -161 over Vinci- The up and comer Pavlychenkova should be able to take out the elder Vinci. Both players have had success on grass but in her short career at Wimbledon Pavlyuchenkova has made the round of 32 here last yea and shown the tools to go deeper here in the draw. With a good serve and solid opening round win 6-2 6-2 over Petra Cetkovska, Vinci is not without weapons herself as she has a good serve and managed to take out Rybarkova who won a grass warmup to Wimbledon. Palyuchenkova to get through in 3 is my predicition largely based on confidence and the fact she did so well here last year.
Urzela Radwanska -105 vs D. Cibulkova- Radwanksa has a nice serve and plays an aggresive style suited for faster surfaces Cibulkova is 1-4 on grass and prefers playing more on Clay. Radwanska at 8-4 on grass has shown a bit of success on this surface. Expecting Radwanksa in 3 to move on.
4th match that is more of a personal play then anything else.
Jie Zheng -119 over Hantuchova- Hantuchova has a really good serve and a very good career record on grass, Hantuchova struggled with the young Robson in the 1st round where Zheng won in 2 tie breaks vs a good player in Barrios who is a scrappy type player. I think Zheng who has a great overall game will be able to dictate alot of points on Hantuchova's 2nd serve as she is a gifted returner and has a pretty decent serve herself. If Hantuchova is able to land alot of 1st serves in it will be alot tighter match as she relies heavily on her big 1st serve, if that percentage is around 50-60% as opposed to high 70-80% range then this could be straights for Zheng
hope you played my grand salami play i told you to play last night to get back yesterdays losses...and to get back todays losses - play brazil (-300) over s.africa in the confederation cup thursday.
doing all i can to help you out pal...gl GTMONEY
0
hope you played my grand salami play i told you to play last night to get back yesterdays losses...and to get back todays losses - play brazil (-300) over s.africa in the confederation cup thursday.
Schuettler is older than mud and could lose to almost anybody in the field. What's more, I'm not entirely sure he wasn't last year's player's favorite at the books. I can't imagine a more likely reason for his unheralded streak last year. I wouldn't put a bent nickle on Schuettler.
0
Schuettler is older than mud and could lose to almost anybody in the field. What's more, I'm not entirely sure he wasn't last year's player's favorite at the books. I can't imagine a more likely reason for his unheralded streak last year. I wouldn't put a bent nickle on Schuettler.
you are on my Play Ursala Radawhatalong as name I put in yesterdays thread. thats the way to get me on your good side! Lol. I need to look closer at Zheng But I believ that is the pay as well. Won't play Pavly or Shuettler. Much Better plays out there. May I ask why you never pick a dog?
0
you are on my Play Ursala Radawhatalong as name I put in yesterdays thread. thats the way to get me on your good side! Lol. I need to look closer at Zheng But I believ that is the pay as well. Won't play Pavly or Shuettler. Much Better plays out there. May I ask why you never pick a dog?
gl man but 6-6 is pretty deceiving when your laying -200 every match. Try a few dogs they are good for your health.
or (-300) like he has done.....very good point underdog with his 6-6 record. i keep giving GTMONEY winners to bail himself out of the hole he is in with his tennis picks..hope he has listened.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Underdog11:
gl man but 6-6 is pretty deceiving when your laying -200 every match. Try a few dogs they are good for your health.
or (-300) like he has done.....very good point underdog with his 6-6 record. i keep giving GTMONEY winners to bail himself out of the hole he is in with his tennis picks..hope he has listened.
he claims in another post of his that he took 800 dollars and is a nearly 100,000 now in a matter of a few weeks - and to nobodys surprise all those plays were unposted..lololol - i wanted to cut this guy some slack even though his tennis writeups are filled with multiple inaccuracies, but its gonna be hard to after this claim of his.
GTMONEY, you're making yourself look like an idiot my posting this shit, just stop while you have a very small piece of credibility left.
0
he claims in another post of his that he took 800 dollars and is a nearly 100,000 now in a matter of a few weeks - and to nobodys surprise all those plays were unposted..lololol - i wanted to cut this guy some slack even though his tennis writeups are filled with multiple inaccuracies, but its gonna be hard to after this claim of his.
GTMONEY, you're making yourself look like an idiot my posting this shit, just stop while you have a very small piece of credibility left.
HEY GUYS, ID STOP BASHING HIM. HE IS TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT HE STARTED AND WHAT HE MADE. WE TALK DAILY AND HE ISNT LYING AT ALL IN THE LEAST BIT. ID HOPE I HAVE ENOUGH RESPECT IN HERE TO BE BELIEVED BUT FOR ALL YOU NAYSAYERS HE IS TELLING THE TRUTH, CONSIDERING WE PRETTY MUCH TOOK THE SAME STUFF ALMOST DURING HIS RIDE, AND YOU SEE WHAT I MADE. WHATS FUNNY IS ALL YOU IN HERE ARE BASHING A GUY THAT GOES .500 WHEN MOST OF YOU ARE BARELY PEAKING AT .250 ON THE WINNING RATE, GET OFF HIS ASS ALREADY, And yes i am yelling because its so stupid when you all come in here and want to bash because you probably have taken bad picks yourself and get pissed at tailing someone. Either take his picks or dont and shut up
0
HEY GUYS, ID STOP BASHING HIM. HE IS TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT HE STARTED AND WHAT HE MADE. WE TALK DAILY AND HE ISNT LYING AT ALL IN THE LEAST BIT. ID HOPE I HAVE ENOUGH RESPECT IN HERE TO BE BELIEVED BUT FOR ALL YOU NAYSAYERS HE IS TELLING THE TRUTH, CONSIDERING WE PRETTY MUCH TOOK THE SAME STUFF ALMOST DURING HIS RIDE, AND YOU SEE WHAT I MADE. WHATS FUNNY IS ALL YOU IN HERE ARE BASHING A GUY THAT GOES .500 WHEN MOST OF YOU ARE BARELY PEAKING AT .250 ON THE WINNING RATE, GET OFF HIS ASS ALREADY, And yes i am yelling because its so stupid when you all come in here and want to bash because you probably have taken bad picks yourself and get pissed at tailing someone. Either take his picks or dont and shut up
he claims in another post of his that he took 800 dollars and is a nearly 100,000 now in a matter of a few weeks - and to nobodys surprise all those plays were unposted..lololol - i wanted to cut this guy some slack even though his tennis writeups are filled with multiple inaccuracies, but its gonna be hard to after this claim of his.
GTMONEY, you're making yourself look like an idiot my posting this shit, just stop while you have a very small piece of credibility left.
LOL after reading all this claiming up 98K after seeing him tank 3 days in a row... actually today's matches were slaughter matches, not even competitive. Marty Fish was the only win.
When someone claims to be up 98k it's a form of self defense, have to say something.. you did give him winners.. but he was very arrogant when you asked him a simple question.. (about a certain player proving themselves on grass.. instead of replying with a nice courteous answser, he attacked you. Personally it was a very good question guess when you have NO answer "attack" LOL!.
Only way he is up 98k if he fades him own picks :)
0
Quote Originally Posted by ARROWS1992:
he claims in another post of his that he took 800 dollars and is a nearly 100,000 now in a matter of a few weeks - and to nobodys surprise all those plays were unposted..lololol - i wanted to cut this guy some slack even though his tennis writeups are filled with multiple inaccuracies, but its gonna be hard to after this claim of his.
GTMONEY, you're making yourself look like an idiot my posting this shit, just stop while you have a very small piece of credibility left.
LOL after reading all this claiming up 98K after seeing him tank 3 days in a row... actually today's matches were slaughter matches, not even competitive. Marty Fish was the only win.
When someone claims to be up 98k it's a form of self defense, have to say something.. you did give him winners.. but he was very arrogant when you asked him a simple question.. (about a certain player proving themselves on grass.. instead of replying with a nice courteous answser, he attacked you. Personally it was a very good question guess when you have NO answer "attack" LOL!.
Only way he is up 98k if he fades him own picks :)
I got a laugh from this guys writeup when he said "Three sets are all it should take for Radwanska to dispel of Cibulkova"..three sets are all it should take? by rule that's all it's allowed to take :)
more classic stuff.......they continue to shred this guy on his writeup on the covers homepage.
0
I got a laugh from this guys writeup when he said "Three sets are all it should take for Radwanska to dispel of Cibulkova"..three sets are all it should take? by rule that's all it's allowed to take :)
more classic stuff.......they continue to shred this guy on his writeup on the covers homepage.
Well I was kidding about fading his own plays.. regardless if he's up or not... you never BOAST about how much your up.. I've never seen a true gambler say how much they're UP.
Only when the the foreclosure sign is being tacked onto the door does the man let his wife know he's down lol.
Seriously I think everyone should play their own picks.. betting is because YOU pick the winner.. and that's what gets the juices flowing... and keeps us going. Playing someone else plays you're really not betting.. you basically have ZERO faith in yourself.. and hope someone else can bail you out.
0
Well I was kidding about fading his own plays.. regardless if he's up or not... you never BOAST about how much your up.. I've never seen a true gambler say how much they're UP.
Only when the the foreclosure sign is being tacked onto the door does the man let his wife know he's down lol.
Seriously I think everyone should play their own picks.. betting is because YOU pick the winner.. and that's what gets the juices flowing... and keeps us going. Playing someone else plays you're really not betting.. you basically have ZERO faith in yourself.. and hope someone else can bail you out.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.