Badosa has rallied really well in Set 2 (5-1). They’re both at 7-7 games, would you play Badosa -1.5 games live? I’m thinking of adding to the play I already have
Yeah I ended up taking it at -2.5 so I'm hoping for Badosa to win by a break. I was also able to get her ML when it somehow jumped up to +475 at one of my books momentarily at the beginning of the first delay.
1
Quote Originally Posted by JoseAlonso787:
Badosa has rallied really well in Set 2 (5-1). They’re both at 7-7 games, would you play Badosa -1.5 games live? I’m thinking of adding to the play I already have
Yeah I ended up taking it at -2.5 so I'm hoping for Badosa to win by a break. I was also able to get her ML when it somehow jumped up to +475 at one of my books momentarily at the beginning of the first delay.
@bringit Keep crushing it!! Love it. Tailing on the Collins play. What do you think about Errani-Paolini +1.5 sets at (-130)? Like it, love it, or hate it?
I like it. Frankly I'm probably personally going to jump on their ML at +200 and maybe 2-0 sets at +405. The Gauff/Pegula combo has not been nearly as successful this year as they were in years past while Errani/Paolini have been on fire.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JoseAlonso787:
@bringit Keep crushing it!! Love it. Tailing on the Collins play. What do you think about Errani-Paolini +1.5 sets at (-130)? Like it, love it, or hate it?
I like it. Frankly I'm probably personally going to jump on their ML at +200 and maybe 2-0 sets at +405. The Gauff/Pegula combo has not been nearly as successful this year as they were in years past while Errani/Paolini have been on fire.
Funny thing is the match is eerily similar to the French Open final where you had Coco, who had just been knocked out of the singles draw, playing against Jasmine who is making a surprise run. Biggest difference though is in France Gauff was playing with Siniakova who has been the best doubles player in the world over the past 5-6 years and can plug and play with anyone. I'm not sure the Gauff/Pegula team would have ever made it that far.
0
Funny thing is the match is eerily similar to the French Open final where you had Coco, who had just been knocked out of the singles draw, playing against Jasmine who is making a surprise run. Biggest difference though is in France Gauff was playing with Siniakova who has been the best doubles player in the world over the past 5-6 years and can plug and play with anyone. I'm not sure the Gauff/Pegula team would have ever made it that far.
4-8 in their last 12 matches, question is how much does Paolini want to win this? She probably never going to have such an easy road to the final in Wimbledon again and last time she reached the final in both singles and doubles she was outplayed in both finals in French open.
So won't be surprised if they lose this one today because of that, staying away but bol
0
4-8 in their last 12 matches, question is how much does Paolini want to win this? She probably never going to have such an easy road to the final in Wimbledon again and last time she reached the final in both singles and doubles she was outplayed in both finals in French open.
So won't be surprised if they lose this one today because of that, staying away but bol
Yeah, I should've laid off. Gauff was really good today. The scoreline of their first match here was 7-5, 6-7, 7-5 and that was against really bad opponents so I thought the Italians could at least match that. Even though Jasmine was already in the RG finals before the last doubles loss you could make the argument that she could have a better shot to win here and if she were to do so she would still need a few more tough wins.
0
@Bjorn_Borg
Yeah, I should've laid off. Gauff was really good today. The scoreline of their first match here was 7-5, 6-7, 7-5 and that was against really bad opponents so I thought the Italians could at least match that. Even though Jasmine was already in the RG finals before the last doubles loss you could make the argument that she could have a better shot to win here and if she were to do so she would still need a few more tough wins.
Well it almost certainly looked like an 0-3 start with the Italians going down, Kalinskaya getting hurt and losing 8 straight games, and Hsieh/Mertens inexplicably losing 4 games in a row to start the second set. Then thankfully Kalinskaya retires and H/M just dominate the 3rd set to squeak out the game spread victory to put us at 1-1 with the Danimal remaining.
0
Well it almost certainly looked like an 0-3 start with the Italians going down, Kalinskaya getting hurt and losing 8 straight games, and Hsieh/Mertens inexplicably losing 4 games in a row to start the second set. Then thankfully Kalinskaya retires and H/M just dominate the 3rd set to squeak out the game spread victory to put us at 1-1 with the Danimal remaining.
Adding (Starting soon): Chan/Kudermetova OVER 11.5 games won (-130)
This pair made finals appearances on grass at both Berlin and Bad Homburg this year. Krejcicova/Siegemund are a very good pairing as well but I really think Chan/Kud at least get to 12 games if not win outright. Plus they changed the schedule so that the women's singles final is the same day as the doubles final which could affect Krejcicova's focus since she's still in the singles draw.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bringit:
Adding (Starting soon): Chan/Kudermetova OVER 11.5 games won (-130)
This pair made finals appearances on grass at both Berlin and Bad Homburg this year. Krejcicova/Siegemund are a very good pairing as well but I really think Chan/Kud at least get to 12 games if not win outright. Plus they changed the schedule so that the women's singles final is the same day as the doubles final which could affect Krejcicova's focus since she's still in the singles draw.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.