You've got to be kidding me. Bookmaker.com isn't paying to make picks, if they knew exactly what side was going to win, dont you think they would just have someone bet it for them???
If you really think there is a "right" or "wrong" side to these games, I got a bridge to sell you. You know exactly how these guys feel when they get up in the morning? You know when the players will hit their shots and when they'll miss their layups? This is basically a coin toss, but you're laying 11 to win 10 every time, in the long run you'll go broke.
You've got to be kidding me. Bookmaker.com isn't paying to make picks, if they knew exactly what side was going to win, dont you think they would just have someone bet it for them???
If you really think there is a "right" or "wrong" side to these games, I got a bridge to sell you. You know exactly how these guys feel when they get up in the morning? You know when the players will hit their shots and when they'll miss their layups? This is basically a coin toss, but you're laying 11 to win 10 every time, in the long run you'll go broke.
No offense MRSARASOTA, but this argument just doesn't make any sense to me. It is like saying if you only play 3 hands of blackjack every time you go to the casino instead of 30, you have a better chance at winning longterm.
Now if it is thought you will get more quality in the picks by limiting it to 3, I can see the reasoning, but if someone caps games, and can do it at a 55-57% rate longterm, I don't see how giving more picks would be a detriment. If you pick 50%, but limit the amount of plays, you are delaying the inevitable...0$ bankroll.
Just my 2 cents...
No offense MRSARASOTA, but this argument just doesn't make any sense to me. It is like saying if you only play 3 hands of blackjack every time you go to the casino instead of 30, you have a better chance at winning longterm.
Now if it is thought you will get more quality in the picks by limiting it to 3, I can see the reasoning, but if someone caps games, and can do it at a 55-57% rate longterm, I don't see how giving more picks would be a detriment. If you pick 50%, but limit the amount of plays, you are delaying the inevitable...0$ bankroll.
Just my 2 cents...
You've got to be kidding me. Bookmaker.com isn't paying to make picks, if they knew exactly what side was going to win, dont you think they would just have someone bet it for them???
If you really think there is a "right" or "wrong" side to these games, I got a bridge to sell you. You know exactly how these guys feel when they get up in the morning? You know when the players will hit their shots and when they'll miss their layups? This is basically a coin toss, but you're laying 11 to win 10 every time, in the long run you'll go broke.
You've got to be kidding me. Bookmaker.com isn't paying to make picks, if they knew exactly what side was going to win, dont you think they would just have someone bet it for them???
If you really think there is a "right" or "wrong" side to these games, I got a bridge to sell you. You know exactly how these guys feel when they get up in the morning? You know when the players will hit their shots and when they'll miss their layups? This is basically a coin toss, but you're laying 11 to win 10 every time, in the long run you'll go broke.
Well put thotho - that is probably why these bets are so rare between handicappers and especially in the public. The bottom line is we need to get folks to listen to the show - its incredible and we want to promote it.
With that said and Teddy and I spoke about this - this is what we do for a living - we sell plays and we are confident in our picks - but yes we can go cold and teddy has been on fire for 1 year (so he is due) but our customers know us - we both have very good business going and close to 10 years each doing this. It will for sure affect our business negatively if we suck - but only for a short period of time - we both have a very loyal following and have been making money for customers for years.
I will tell you this - both Teddy and I will be gutted and i mean gutted if we publicly suck so hard - but lets worry about that in 10 weeks.
OT would be one intense insane week - lol.
Well put thotho - that is probably why these bets are so rare between handicappers and especially in the public. The bottom line is we need to get folks to listen to the show - its incredible and we want to promote it.
With that said and Teddy and I spoke about this - this is what we do for a living - we sell plays and we are confident in our picks - but yes we can go cold and teddy has been on fire for 1 year (so he is due) but our customers know us - we both have very good business going and close to 10 years each doing this. It will for sure affect our business negatively if we suck - but only for a short period of time - we both have a very loyal following and have been making money for customers for years.
I will tell you this - both Teddy and I will be gutted and i mean gutted if we publicly suck so hard - but lets worry about that in 10 weeks.
OT would be one intense insane week - lol.
Teddy or The Prez whos having Bulls as there play for the 50,000 dollar 50 pick contest???????????
-- And then with 30 seconds left and Miami ahead by 13, the Heat called timeout, which seemed to get the Bulls more upset than they were all game.
Bulls coach Vinny Del Negro, always spirited as a player, reportedly told players to remember what the Heat had done to show them up with assistant Del Harris gesturing toward the Heat bench after the game, apparently not in one of those "good game" sportsmanship gestures.
"They were just calling timeout to set up a play or something," Del Negro told assembled reporters with an edge after the game. "I don't know what they were doing. There's 30 seconds to go in the game. They're up 15 or 13 or whatever. But, whatever, we'll play them again."
Teddy or The Prez whos having Bulls as there play for the 50,000 dollar 50 pick contest???????????
-- And then with 30 seconds left and Miami ahead by 13, the Heat called timeout, which seemed to get the Bulls more upset than they were all game.
Bulls coach Vinny Del Negro, always spirited as a player, reportedly told players to remember what the Heat had done to show them up with assistant Del Harris gesturing toward the Heat bench after the game, apparently not in one of those "good game" sportsmanship gestures.
"They were just calling timeout to set up a play or something," Del Negro told assembled reporters with an edge after the game. "I don't know what they were doing. There's 30 seconds to go in the game. They're up 15 or 13 or whatever. But, whatever, we'll play them again."
Prez, I going to quote your own biography:
"Team you avoid when wagering: All the bad teams in every league. I don’t spent a lot of time trying to look great calling the worst team in the league +18 vs. the best team and saying I told you so after. You will never find me on the worst team in any league, unless I am playing a total."
DNR is right! What up with all these bad teams your are picking?
Well said I PLAY 4 Keeps! I have subscribed to Prez since Jan 21 of this year and pay $400 a month and for this horrendous numbers (exclude MMA):
Win 62; Lose 62; Push 3 for Prez (50%)
Because the line changes when I place my bet, my record is:
Win 60; Lose 66; Push 1
That is a sucky 47%
Since I bet $100 (luckily) to try him out, I am now in the negative $1260 and plus $400 to subscribe for a total of $1660. WOW!
People are right, no one put a gun to my head and tell me to subscribe. But you know what, if I do not my job in my current work place, I would be fired! Just like no one put a gun to my boss head to hire me. So PREZ, I am quoting Donald Trump: "YOUR ARE FIRED!"
Prez, I going to quote your own biography:
"Team you avoid when wagering: All the bad teams in every league. I don’t spent a lot of time trying to look great calling the worst team in the league +18 vs. the best team and saying I told you so after. You will never find me on the worst team in any league, unless I am playing a total."
DNR is right! What up with all these bad teams your are picking?
Well said I PLAY 4 Keeps! I have subscribed to Prez since Jan 21 of this year and pay $400 a month and for this horrendous numbers (exclude MMA):
Win 62; Lose 62; Push 3 for Prez (50%)
Because the line changes when I place my bet, my record is:
Win 60; Lose 66; Push 1
That is a sucky 47%
Since I bet $100 (luckily) to try him out, I am now in the negative $1260 and plus $400 to subscribe for a total of $1660. WOW!
People are right, no one put a gun to my head and tell me to subscribe. But you know what, if I do not my job in my current work place, I would be fired! Just like no one put a gun to my boss head to hire me. So PREZ, I am quoting Donald Trump: "YOUR ARE FIRED!"
Although it's only been three (3) days for Prez & Teddy, not a good start. Is it just a marketing stunt and they are not giving their "top" plays? Is it just a bad start? Or are they really no different than us, but were just smart enough with to claim to be good and find a way to sell picks? I have bought picks in the past and both time I was unhappy with the results. But with Prez & Teddy if they don’t hit at least 63% in 50 days (short time) this was a bad idea, because everyone who tunes into the show and reading this post will I’m sure tell all of their friends. With that said good luck guys!
Also, Boston -2.5 is the pick of the day.
Although it's only been three (3) days for Prez & Teddy, not a good start. Is it just a marketing stunt and they are not giving their "top" plays? Is it just a bad start? Or are they really no different than us, but were just smart enough with to claim to be good and find a way to sell picks? I have bought picks in the past and both time I was unhappy with the results. But with Prez & Teddy if they don’t hit at least 63% in 50 days (short time) this was a bad idea, because everyone who tunes into the show and reading this post will I’m sure tell all of their friends. With that said good luck guys!
Also, Boston -2.5 is the pick of the day.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.