Profit to date if staking from start was: | ||
Flat $550 | $1,333 | |
Flat $1100 | $2,667 | |
3% of BR | $1,855 | |
5% of BR | $1,975 | |
Profit to date if staking from start was: | ||
Flat $550 | $1,333 | |
Flat $1100 | $2,667 | |
3% of BR | $1,855 | |
5% of BR | $1,975 | |
W | L | P | W% | Profit | |
Parlays | 0 | 1 | 0 | - | -$200 |
Moneyline bets | 0 | 3 | 0 | - | -$2,100 |
Single spread bets | 44 | 35 | 2 | 55.70% | -$3,050 |
Grand total | 44 | 39 | 2 | - | -$5,350 |
W | L | P | W% | Profit | |
Parlays | 0 | 1 | 0 | - | -$200 |
Moneyline bets | 0 | 3 | 0 | - | -$2,100 |
Single spread bets | 44 | 35 | 2 | 55.70% | -$3,050 |
Grand total | 44 | 39 | 2 | - | -$5,350 |
Ya know, Bermax should add a column "Profit if I listend to that Scal guy" to his spreadsheet. That column would be the greenest of all.
You keep looking at being down 5K and thinking of that Kings bet.
Not only did I heavily advise you not to make that Kings bet, but there are no less than SIX other games where I said you were making a mistake and should reconsider, the latest being this UConn atrocity.
Oh well. Onto today with some more foolishness.
Ya know, Bermax should add a column "Profit if I listend to that Scal guy" to his spreadsheet. That column would be the greenest of all.
You keep looking at being down 5K and thinking of that Kings bet.
Not only did I heavily advise you not to make that Kings bet, but there are no less than SIX other games where I said you were making a mistake and should reconsider, the latest being this UConn atrocity.
Oh well. Onto today with some more foolishness.
Ya know, Bermax should add a column "Profit if I listend to that Scal guy" to his spreadsheet. That column would be the greenest of all.
You keep looking at being down 5K and thinking of that Kings bet.
Not only did I heavily advise you not to make that Kings bet, but there are no less than SIX other games where I said you were making a mistake and should reconsider, the latest being this UConn atrocity.
Oh well. Onto today with some more foolishness.
Ya know, Bermax should add a column "Profit if I listend to that Scal guy" to his spreadsheet. That column would be the greenest of all.
You keep looking at being down 5K and thinking of that Kings bet.
Not only did I heavily advise you not to make that Kings bet, but there are no less than SIX other games where I said you were making a mistake and should reconsider, the latest being this UConn atrocity.
Oh well. Onto today with some more foolishness.
Profit to date if staking from start was: |
||
Flat $550 | $1,333 | |
Flat $1100 | $2,667 | |
3% of BR | $1,855 | |
5% of BR | $1,975 | |
(Staking plan as above if odds are around -110, stakes are reduced for long odds ML and Parlay plays)
And these numbers too...
Are these supposed to be impressive? He's been in Vegas how long? A month?
He only started his K plays because he was losing money. If he stuck with $550, his original plan, he'd have $1,333. That seems GREAT compared to -$5,000 but there is no way he'd be satisfied with that if he was sober, hence, more bankroll unraveling.
It would be more than he has now but not nearly enough to handle the lower bound estimate of his monthly expenses which was 3K (and that is living a lifestyle absent the recent debauchery which we know wouldn't be nonexistent!).
Profit to date if staking from start was: |
||
Flat $550 | $1,333 | |
Flat $1100 | $2,667 | |
3% of BR | $1,855 | |
5% of BR | $1,975 | |
(Staking plan as above if odds are around -110, stakes are reduced for long odds ML and Parlay plays)
And these numbers too...
Are these supposed to be impressive? He's been in Vegas how long? A month?
He only started his K plays because he was losing money. If he stuck with $550, his original plan, he'd have $1,333. That seems GREAT compared to -$5,000 but there is no way he'd be satisfied with that if he was sober, hence, more bankroll unraveling.
It would be more than he has now but not nearly enough to handle the lower bound estimate of his monthly expenses which was 3K (and that is living a lifestyle absent the recent debauchery which we know wouldn't be nonexistent!).
Uh, yes I did win it. 90% of the books had it at 2.5 WELL AFTER I posted it which was THE DAY AFTER I posted it.
I post my lines at the time of posting my thread which is the night before. It opened at 1.5 and was at 1.5 when I posted.
Now cappers here are supposed to win on every line move and beyond?
That is not in dispute. Just because you get to the thread 12 hours later and see 2.5 doesn't mean the original post isn't legitimate.
I even had a guy tell me he could get it at 2.5 and asked what he should do. I told him to buy a half point down (the correct move)so he loses nothing in the end.
Many others in the thread played the Harvard ML.
So beat it chump. The game was capped appropriately and I stressed heavily in that thread points were at a major premium.
You are a joke kid. There isn't a single person in that thread that disputes that line.
Uh, yes I did win it. 90% of the books had it at 2.5 WELL AFTER I posted it which was THE DAY AFTER I posted it.
I post my lines at the time of posting my thread which is the night before. It opened at 1.5 and was at 1.5 when I posted.
Now cappers here are supposed to win on every line move and beyond?
That is not in dispute. Just because you get to the thread 12 hours later and see 2.5 doesn't mean the original post isn't legitimate.
I even had a guy tell me he could get it at 2.5 and asked what he should do. I told him to buy a half point down (the correct move)so he loses nothing in the end.
Many others in the thread played the Harvard ML.
So beat it chump. The game was capped appropriately and I stressed heavily in that thread points were at a major premium.
You are a joke kid. There isn't a single person in that thread that disputes that line.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.