All Forums | The Archives

MRBator You might want to read this

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 84270
Posts: 368
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 300
Posted: #1
Mr. B,
 
You advice has made me money this year and I feel I owe
it to you to give you fair warning on your Colts play versus the Pats.
 
There is a trend going in the post season that says the Pats are the play.
 
The trend is this:
 
If the teams playing have faced eachother during the regular season play as follows.
 
Two pointspread wins= play the team that has covered twice.
 
Split two meetings against the spread= play the team that failed to
cover the most recent meeting.
 
Played each other once= play the team that failed to cover.
 
This system is perfect this year (NYG +6.5 vs Philly, NE -9 vs Jets, Philly +5 vs New Orleans,
and Seattle +9 versus Chicago.
 
It was also a perfect 4-0 last year.
 
I know you are not a trend player and you are a MUCH better handicapper
than me but I want a clear conscience(?) before I bet against you
Tom
 
Thanks again for everything
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 15638
Posted: #2
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 15638
Posted: #3
You better call him in case he doesnt read this... I am sure he would be PISSED to no end if he doesnt
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 300
Posted: #4
Hey Panther I'm just putting this out there, no need to be a wiseass
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 4855
Posted: #5
Past results have absolutely nothing to do with the future. It's all math, if you refine things down far enough there is a trend that is undefeated. Take the Colts and go to bed, it's their year.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 300
Posted: #6
URDaddy,
 
Past results provided four pointspread winners.
 
Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 15638
Posted: #7
just sayin..he may be pissed..
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 205
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by TomCurtisNY:

Hey Panther I'm just putting this out there, no need to be a wiseass
 
80% of his hall of fame posts are wiseass posts  w/ little to zero content.  He offers nothing to this forum based on what I've read.  Most of his posts are about he's the king of the forum and all of those who were around after him are worthless.....he just made a good friend w/ his recent remarks he's going to wish he didnt make
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 300
Posted: #9
Hey Guru thanks for having my back but "Lighten Up Francis"
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 7897
Posted: #10
There was another thread about in here about a 21-1 system that went 0-3 over the weekend.  A system is simply that, a system.  It doesn't take into account injuries, momentum, point-spread value, etc. 
 
Instead of relying on systems, I try and recognize the better team.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 300
Posted: #11
Always,
 
Sorry I just disagree.
 
If a trend is winning I play it the trend until it loses.
 
Even if what you said was true about the 21-1 system, you would still
be 21-4 after going 0-3.
 
You can NEVER go 21-4 just picking the better team.
 
Trends rub people the wrong way because there is no logical
reasoning behind them.
 
IMO that is just pure ego getting in the way.
 
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth is my motto.
 
Even if the Pats hit the crapper, the worst I can do on sides in
this year's playoffs is 4-1.
 
I will take that every time.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 205
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by TomCurtisNY:

Hey Guru thanks for having my back but "Lighten Up Francis"
 
i will, i just hate the almighty king capper attitude that some have
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 183
Posted: #13
This system is perfect this year (NYG +6.5 vs Philly, NE -9 vs Jets, Philly +5 vs New Orleans,
and Seattle +9 versus Chicago
 
line is only indy -3, if indy wins the game, they cover it (imho)
 
giants covered, but lost the game, philly covered but lost the game, seattle covered but lost the game
 
if the line was indy -7, then it would be a stronger play
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 300
Posted: #14
roofus,
 
Four out of the six games fell on three points this year.
 
Buy the hook if it makes you feel better, but a smarter play would be New England ML.
 
The SMARTEST play of all is just stick to the system.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 965
Posted: #15
Like the system alot, good luck ToM any thoughts on the Saints/Bears game???
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 300
Posted: #16
Tico,
 
Saints are just too fast for Chicago right now.
 
I want to see what the weather is going to be, before making a final decision though.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 183
Posted: #17

 brady when he is indoors 10-0, 19-1 art turf 12-1 playoffs, or belichick when it comes to revenge games

 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 4106
Posted: #18
Just remember Brady is wearing 2 of his 3 SB rings because of Venateri  and he's with Indy now
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 300
Posted: #19
Eddie,
 
You can easily reverse Vinatieri with Brady in your statement
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 300
Posted: #20
roofus
 
Nice
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 650
Posted: #21
past results have nothing to do with future results regarding statistics, is the theory, past outcomes have nothing to do with future results.  Mostly true in sports gambling, but there are exceptions to this rule i believe.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2001
Posts: 2365
Posted: #22
Mr. Bator is a mole.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 300
Posted: #23
Bubs,
 
It did cross my mind that he may trying to drive the line in his favor
by posting opposite of what he is really betting, but I do not really
believe it.
 
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 545
Posted: #24
i broke one of my cardinal rules TWICE this playoff season.... Never EVER bet against Brady and Belicheck in the playoffs!
 
I would rather not bet the game than lose more money!
 
I totally respect Bator... but I can't in good concience bet against him again.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 4106
Posted: #25
You can easily reverse Vinatieri with Brady in your statement}}
 
 
Yes but brady isn't playing for Indy like Vinatieri is    AND BTW How many home games has Indy lost this year??  Think I heard zero    Be careful and good luck
All Forums | The Archives
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.