@wallstreetcappers
Yes, that is fine — to the extent that they are ‘blowing it up’.
First you have to admit there is a problem. I have not even seen you admit there is a problem.
Then the question to you is: how do you fix it?
If you wait and let Congress ‘investigate’ it and set up committees to study it — it will never get done.
Trump only has a year-and-a-half to do this.
The other question is still: if not Musk, then who.
Absolutely, you can blow it up. I still am okay with the Hacksaw Jack method.
Most places you go, if you lay off the bottom folks that are not working or performing then the rest will promptly go to work and start performing even better.
You see several examples of this. Even what Musk did at Twitter laying off 40% of the folks and still chugging along.
If you do not think there is a problem in government with excess folks, non-performing folks and waste — then of course you think it is all wrong.
This does not have to be a long drawn out procedure. Just get it done and go from there.
Look at all of the presidents that have tried or expressed interest and never did it. The government only grew under them and worsened under them. You pretty much have to go back to Coolidge to see how to do it.
Sure, of course you make people better. But if the managers have not been doing it — then fire those managers.
But if you have too many people to start with because the people have not gotten better — you have to let some people go. That is just the way it works.
It almost had to be punishing in some way. That is exactly what should be expected by a worker for poor performance. Most of those jobs are not hard to do at all. So, if they are really needed — replace them with someone that will do that job.
If they are not needed and the job can be spread to better performing workers — then still let them go but there will be no need to replace them.
You first have to see that there is a problem. Then you have to address it in a very quick time table.
I am sure if Trump does not ‘perform’ the voters will make sure to let him know soon enough.
But in order to improve things he has to do what he campaigned on. This is simply part of it.
Again, you cannot just say that folks need to be developed to know how to perform and do their job, or to simply work or be kind to customers. This is common sense in every other job.
I always tell people when you are in a merit-based operation you should think you will be the last person laid off. If you are worried that you are on the cutting block, it is only for one of two reasons. We either do not need your job any longer or we have too many doing your job now.
So, if you are worried about being laid off you know deep down maybe your performance was not up to par. Or if you are worried they just have to cut all of your department, period; then you should be making yourself more valuable so that maybe they consider putting you in another job.
There is rarely, rarely any excuse for a worker that has been on a job for an extended period of time to not be performing. There is no development’ needed. This is where the ‘punishment’ you are referring to should take place, in some form.
This has not been happening in government like in other jobs; it is long overdue.
