If you don't mind me asking...where do you both rank the Reds pitching staff? With the record they have (35-0 in f5 runline)...are they not a "play" in about every series?
0
If you don't mind me asking...where do you both rank the Reds pitching staff? With the record they have (35-0 in f5 runline)...are they not a "play" in about every series?
If you don't mind me asking...where do you both rank the Reds pitching staff? With the record they have (35-0 in f5 runline)...are they not a "play" in about every series?
As far as pitching for profit? #2 behind Pirates. I feel comfy taking them F5 w/ Cueto, Latos, Bailey.
0
Quote Originally Posted by michael_scotch:
If you don't mind me asking...where do you both rank the Reds pitching staff? With the record they have (35-0 in f5 runline)...are they not a "play" in about every series?
As far as pitching for profit? #2 behind Pirates. I feel comfy taking them F5 w/ Cueto, Latos, Bailey.
REDS are 9th POST ALL STAR BREAK. I start doing Post all-star projections from 8/15 till the end of the season. The WHIP of 1.32 holds them back a bit.
REDS are 7th overall for the full season.
I do not do 5 inning splits just full game.
0
Michael-scotch
REDS are 9th POST ALL STAR BREAK. I start doing Post all-star projections from 8/15 till the end of the season. The WHIP of 1.32 holds them back a bit.
Good point, Note: My Rankings are F5. Based on +odds. The Yanks cover the F5 just as much as the Reds. Just at a juicy rate which drops them in my rankings.
I havent been updating the F5 stats as much in the 2H. Mainly cause im having fun with these Totals and all the data that goes with it. 30-0 so far!
0
Good point, Note: My Rankings are F5. Based on +odds. The Yanks cover the F5 just as much as the Reds. Just at a juicy rate which drops them in my rankings.
I havent been updating the F5 stats as much in the 2H. Mainly cause im having fun with these Totals and all the data that goes with it. 30-0 so far!
If you don't mind me asking...where do you both rank the Reds pitching staff? With the record they have (35-0 in f5 runline)...are they not a "play" in about every series?
BTW. I was big Michael Scott fan. Cant watch without him
0
Quote Originally Posted by michael_scotch:
If you don't mind me asking...where do you both rank the Reds pitching staff? With the record they have (35-0 in f5 runline)...are they not a "play" in about every series?
BTW. I was big Michael Scott fan. Cant watch without him
Just throwing it out there..CWS vs AL EAST at least one game has gone over the total in a series..with that said semper or mcshady do you have any info on pitching matchups for the remainder of this series? If not its cool. Just trying to dig up some winners haha.
0
Just throwing it out there..CWS vs AL EAST at least one game has gone over the total in a series..with that said semper or mcshady do you have any info on pitching matchups for the remainder of this series? If not its cool. Just trying to dig up some winners haha.
I slept in today and have just gotten up to date on everything. Another situation I wish I hadn't seen happen. I'm not going to re-hash all this but I must say that I hope you re-consider sharing your series section once again McShady. I depend on that some days as I have to make plays before I go to work and some days are earlier than others. If you place a play on the spreadsheet before having time to post in the forum it really helps me because of the urgency of my work schedule. I don't pay any attention to the amounts, just the plays. The reason I don't pay attention to the amounts is I know you could change your mind (as is your right) as I do many times before actually pressing "submit". Everyone should be able to realize that and I wish it hadn't been questioned. Thanks for keeping the McTrends up, that is very helpful!
I wish I had time yesterday to post a nice winner on the Twins last night but I didn't have time. I have had 15 of the last 21 days in the black, including +3 units yesterday, thanks to you and Semper that would not be possible.
I must also thank those you have made kind comments about myself, even though I am nowhere near the level of Semper or McShady I do appreciate positive feedback even when some of my plays "totally" suck as the Total O'Day has lost 7 days in a row! The only reason I keep posting it is because I know some people like to fade instead of play, and I may do the same!
I wish I had made that 5 teamer with McShady as I do that kind of thing from time to time.
Thanks Semper and McShady for all the winners yesterday and McShady please post if you have any plays for today. There are new series starting and I don't want to miss anything!
Total O'Day now 85-53, 61-27, 28-14 (and 18-12, 0-7) as posted here. Looks like fade material now even though it would have pushed last night if you had 8 instead of under 7.5 on Cle/Angels.
Tonight's total is Oak/KC under 9 but all I have is 8.5 so that is official. Play or fade!
Semper or McShady, I will be happy to stop posting these totals all you have to do is say the word. That is why I say play or fade. It was easy money for awhile playing and now it's a fade play.
When I have a jump-in for one or 2 games I have done pretty well with those and I will play 4-10 units on these and these will be my best plays as they are based on successful stategies that have worked over the years. There just aren't that many plays as you have to wait for a certain team to lose, etc before jumping-in.
McShady, looking forward to your plays for today! You are a beloved and appreciated presence here! Keep up the good work and fighting the good fight in spite of everything! Get MAD at dem EGGS!
0
I slept in today and have just gotten up to date on everything. Another situation I wish I hadn't seen happen. I'm not going to re-hash all this but I must say that I hope you re-consider sharing your series section once again McShady. I depend on that some days as I have to make plays before I go to work and some days are earlier than others. If you place a play on the spreadsheet before having time to post in the forum it really helps me because of the urgency of my work schedule. I don't pay any attention to the amounts, just the plays. The reason I don't pay attention to the amounts is I know you could change your mind (as is your right) as I do many times before actually pressing "submit". Everyone should be able to realize that and I wish it hadn't been questioned. Thanks for keeping the McTrends up, that is very helpful!
I wish I had time yesterday to post a nice winner on the Twins last night but I didn't have time. I have had 15 of the last 21 days in the black, including +3 units yesterday, thanks to you and Semper that would not be possible.
I must also thank those you have made kind comments about myself, even though I am nowhere near the level of Semper or McShady I do appreciate positive feedback even when some of my plays "totally" suck as the Total O'Day has lost 7 days in a row! The only reason I keep posting it is because I know some people like to fade instead of play, and I may do the same!
I wish I had made that 5 teamer with McShady as I do that kind of thing from time to time.
Thanks Semper and McShady for all the winners yesterday and McShady please post if you have any plays for today. There are new series starting and I don't want to miss anything!
Total O'Day now 85-53, 61-27, 28-14 (and 18-12, 0-7) as posted here. Looks like fade material now even though it would have pushed last night if you had 8 instead of under 7.5 on Cle/Angels.
Tonight's total is Oak/KC under 9 but all I have is 8.5 so that is official. Play or fade!
Semper or McShady, I will be happy to stop posting these totals all you have to do is say the word. That is why I say play or fade. It was easy money for awhile playing and now it's a fade play.
When I have a jump-in for one or 2 games I have done pretty well with those and I will play 4-10 units on these and these will be my best plays as they are based on successful stategies that have worked over the years. There just aren't that many plays as you have to wait for a certain team to lose, etc before jumping-in.
McShady, looking forward to your plays for today! You are a beloved and appreciated presence here! Keep up the good work and fighting the good fight in spite of everything! Get MAD at dem EGGS!
i agree with @aggie. im @ work during the afternoon(pt time) and depend gratefully on you series section! hopefully you would reconsider. thank you mcshady.
0
i agree with @aggie. im @ work during the afternoon(pt time) and depend gratefully on you series section! hopefully you would reconsider. thank you mcshady.
Just throwing it out there..CWS vs AL EAST at least one game has gone over the total in a series..with that said semper or mcshady do you have any info on pitching matchups for the remainder of this series? If not its cool. Just trying to dig up some winners haha.
Just a tip. Im estimating 8 series included for that stat. Too small of a size. 50 series played during the season. If im gonna put my name on it...I want a 40% of total played. So 20 series.
With all that said. I think you will get an Over with the 2 left. I leaned Under with the series
0
Quote Originally Posted by hi2ak:
Just throwing it out there..CWS vs AL EAST at least one game has gone over the total in a series..with that said semper or mcshady do you have any info on pitching matchups for the remainder of this series? If not its cool. Just trying to dig up some winners haha.
Just a tip. Im estimating 8 series included for that stat. Too small of a size. 50 series played during the season. If im gonna put my name on it...I want a 40% of total played. So 20 series.
With all that said. I think you will get an Over with the 2 left. I leaned Under with the series
As an Astros fan, I have to say it is still scary for me chasing the Astros, but I have faith in Semper! But, that being said, it is the fricking Flubs!
0
As an Astros fan, I have to say it is still scary for me chasing the Astros, but I have faith in Semper! But, that being said, it is the fricking Flubs!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.