i lost any respect i had for you after that comment. are you that frustrated by mavin's threads rightfully earned popularity that you can accuse mavin playing if games? mavin is? are you completely out of your mind you ego maniac? if theres one person who always says that ifs dont count is mavin and you must be some sorry a s s m f to say those stupid remarks you been making on this thread. idiot cmjohnson. no class
Slight overreaction there sir
If Mavin said that "if's" don't count, then why did he mention it? I actually meant it as constructive criticism, because if you constantly look back at past picks and say..."if" I had only played totals, or "if" I had focused on this I would be better than you lose sight of what you are trying to do today. The picks are done, they either won or lost, and it just seemed to me by Mavin pointing that out he may have been losing sight on the picks at hand.
Guess that was too difficult to understand though
0
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
i lost any respect i had for you after that comment. are you that frustrated by mavin's threads rightfully earned popularity that you can accuse mavin playing if games? mavin is? are you completely out of your mind you ego maniac? if theres one person who always says that ifs dont count is mavin and you must be some sorry a s s m f to say those stupid remarks you been making on this thread. idiot cmjohnson. no class
Slight overreaction there sir
If Mavin said that "if's" don't count, then why did he mention it? I actually meant it as constructive criticism, because if you constantly look back at past picks and say..."if" I had only played totals, or "if" I had focused on this I would be better than you lose sight of what you are trying to do today. The picks are done, they either won or lost, and it just seemed to me by Mavin pointing that out he may have been losing sight on the picks at hand.
January 29, Bet 01 OVER Cavaliers 50.5 2Q - $118 to win $100
I'm a bit wary with the totals here, especially with GS tired from back to back road games. But I still see both teams going for it in the first half and with a tired defense on one side and a good free thrower team on the other, every detail seems to conspire against the under here.
0
January 29, Bet 01 OVER Cavaliers 50.5 2Q - $118 to win $100
I'm a bit wary with the totals here, especially with GS tired from back to back road games. But I still see both teams going for it in the first half and with a tired defense on one side and a good free thrower team on the other, every detail seems to conspire against the under here.
That's pretty simple Phixer. They play with you and live from the juice. Unlike most in that business - they're big - let's say like big books who live from the juice compared to a small time bookie who wins when you lose. If you lose at OptionRally - they lose along with with you. If you win - they make that margin % between 100% and what you get (75%-82%). They don't play against you but with you. That is why their advises and consulting are worty and they have academies and all those things to teach you trading. Kind of what we're doing together here. They're really cool and keep their good name intact. So that"dude" won - true - but they won too. And since the margin between his initial deposit plus what he won was over 10K in USD - they were willing to do the gesture. I got all the credit here for that but they should be getting that credit more than me.
OK, enough about that. Let's handicap and watch some games. GL Phixer. I hope I answered you in full. If you want to discuss it further - add me as a friend and let's discuss it in PMs as it does not seem to me appropriate to continue that here.
I am a stock trader and options trader but never done binary- simply because most sites don't allow it where I am located. But if you are able to do it it works great- Specially with my charting skills. Keep up the good work Mavin
0
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
That's pretty simple Phixer. They play with you and live from the juice. Unlike most in that business - they're big - let's say like big books who live from the juice compared to a small time bookie who wins when you lose. If you lose at OptionRally - they lose along with with you. If you win - they make that margin % between 100% and what you get (75%-82%). They don't play against you but with you. That is why their advises and consulting are worty and they have academies and all those things to teach you trading. Kind of what we're doing together here. They're really cool and keep their good name intact. So that"dude" won - true - but they won too. And since the margin between his initial deposit plus what he won was over 10K in USD - they were willing to do the gesture. I got all the credit here for that but they should be getting that credit more than me.
OK, enough about that. Let's handicap and watch some games. GL Phixer. I hope I answered you in full. If you want to discuss it further - add me as a friend and let's discuss it in PMs as it does not seem to me appropriate to continue that here.
I am a stock trader and options trader but never done binary- simply because most sites don't allow it where I am located. But if you are able to do it it works great- Specially with my charting skills. Keep up the good work Mavin
If Mavin said that "if's" don't count, then why did he mention it? I actually meant it as constructive criticism, because if you constantly look back at past picks and say..."if" I had only played totals, or "if" I had focused on this I would be better than you lose sight of what you are trying to do today. The picks are done, they either won or lost, and it just seemed to me by Mavin pointing that out he may have been losing sight on the picks at hand.
Guess that was too difficult to understand though
Ok CM. I had enough of this pointless discussion. If you read the thread you'd know I never blame a fix or say if on any player performance or refs etc. I always take the responsibility and say that I was the one who picked the wrong side. You're the one who did overreact in a preposterously patronizing way to my post which was meant to laugh at my own totals picking ability lately. You failed or did not want to understand it causing otherwise civil and peaceful visitor's harsh reaction towards you which I do not condone and avoided commenting myself to. But - if you're a straight person and I hope you are and have a decency you talk with - please note that your comment was merely indicating you are looking to point out something negative and never bothered to point anything positive on this thread. I say everyone has a right to post anything they want as long as it is in a civil manner - but that means everyone.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:
Slight overreaction there sir
If Mavin said that "if's" don't count, then why did he mention it? I actually meant it as constructive criticism, because if you constantly look back at past picks and say..."if" I had only played totals, or "if" I had focused on this I would be better than you lose sight of what you are trying to do today. The picks are done, they either won or lost, and it just seemed to me by Mavin pointing that out he may have been losing sight on the picks at hand.
Guess that was too difficult to understand though
Ok CM. I had enough of this pointless discussion. If you read the thread you'd know I never blame a fix or say if on any player performance or refs etc. I always take the responsibility and say that I was the one who picked the wrong side. You're the one who did overreact in a preposterously patronizing way to my post which was meant to laugh at my own totals picking ability lately. You failed or did not want to understand it causing otherwise civil and peaceful visitor's harsh reaction towards you which I do not condone and avoided commenting myself to. But - if you're a straight person and I hope you are and have a decency you talk with - please note that your comment was merely indicating you are looking to point out something negative and never bothered to point anything positive on this thread. I say everyone has a right to post anything they want as long as it is in a civil manner - but that means everyone.
January 29, Bet 01 OVER Cavaliers 50.5 2Q - $118 to win $100
I'm a bit wary with the totals here, especially with GS tired from back to back road games. But I still see both teams going for it in the first half and with a tired defense on one side and a good free thrower team on the other, every detail seems to conspire against the under here.
GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by dexterjau3:
January 29, Bet 01 OVER Cavaliers 50.5 2Q - $118 to win $100
I'm a bit wary with the totals here, especially with GS tired from back to back road games. But I still see both teams going for it in the first half and with a tired defense on one side and a good free thrower team on the other, every detail seems to conspire against the under here.
I am a stock trader and options trader but never done binary- simply because most sites don't allow it where I am located. But if you are able to do it it works great- Specially with my charting skills. Keep up the good work Mavin
Yes. If you're a US resident - you're not able to trade binary options online. And if someone allows you - beware.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Turbovtk:
I am a stock trader and options trader but never done binary- simply because most sites don't allow it where I am located. But if you are able to do it it works great- Specially with my charting skills. Keep up the good work Mavin
Yes. If you're a US resident - you're not able to trade binary options online. And if someone allows you - beware.
So if we're a US resident we can't play. What do we do, send the money to you and have you play for us. Damn, I was planning on getting into it, is there any solution for us, Mavin?
0
So if we're a US resident we can't play. What do we do, send the money to you and have you play for us. Damn, I was planning on getting into it, is there any solution for us, Mavin?
BTW. I don't know how many of you are using Covers game breakdowns to crunch the numbers. I find that section here incredibly selective with relevant info and before checking on other info suppliers - I always first hit over there to see the trends. It is most valuable in MLB as well which will soon enough knock on our door. I remembered that since I made myself a note to write about it. Usually we fail to see what's under our noses. And no, I don't work for Covers (Ha Ha Ha)
Very true, 65% of capping in baseball is relative to the starting pichers and who is behind the plate and what kind of strike zone that ump has, took me almost half the season last year to figure that out for myself...
0
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
BTW. I don't know how many of you are using Covers game breakdowns to crunch the numbers. I find that section here incredibly selective with relevant info and before checking on other info suppliers - I always first hit over there to see the trends. It is most valuable in MLB as well which will soon enough knock on our door. I remembered that since I made myself a note to write about it. Usually we fail to see what's under our noses. And no, I don't work for Covers (Ha Ha Ha)
Very true, 65% of capping in baseball is relative to the starting pichers and who is behind the plate and what kind of strike zone that ump has, took me almost half the season last year to figure that out for myself...
Difficult card today. K.Irving's illness makes it difficult to figure the things in Cleveland totals or ATS. I stay away from games like that.
The game in Detroit seems more likely to be easier than others with Brandon Johnson being tagged as a slow starter and agitated by his own coach Boylan who criticized for not being as aggressive in the first half. Jennings have really finished with 0 points in the first halves of recent games while coming alive in the second. And against Detroit he has been very limited too.
Final:
MILWAUKEE Bucks -1.5 (-110) 110$
Portland seems like the one to get an edge against the Mavericks who done very good against the spread lately. Too good. But on the other hand the Mavericks have only lost to OKC and SA in their recent games. But, I'll go with Portland here at least at the first half.
Final:
PORTLAND Trail Blazers -1.5 First half (-110) 110$
Final:
PORTLAND Trail Blazers - DALLAS Mavericks Over 202.5 (-110) 110$
I don't think we're about to see a high scoring game in Staples Center - but I will stay out of that one.
0
Difficult card today. K.Irving's illness makes it difficult to figure the things in Cleveland totals or ATS. I stay away from games like that.
The game in Detroit seems more likely to be easier than others with Brandon Johnson being tagged as a slow starter and agitated by his own coach Boylan who criticized for not being as aggressive in the first half. Jennings have really finished with 0 points in the first halves of recent games while coming alive in the second. And against Detroit he has been very limited too.
Final:
MILWAUKEE Bucks -1.5 (-110) 110$
Portland seems like the one to get an edge against the Mavericks who done very good against the spread lately. Too good. But on the other hand the Mavericks have only lost to OKC and SA in their recent games. But, I'll go with Portland here at least at the first half.
Final:
PORTLAND Trail Blazers -1.5 First half (-110) 110$
Final:
PORTLAND Trail Blazers - DALLAS Mavericks Over 202.5 (-110) 110$
I don't think we're about to see a high scoring game in Staples Center - but I will stay out of that one.
The Pistons are just 5-11 ATS in their last 16 games vs. a team with a winning S.U. record. The Bucks on the other hand are 9-4 ATS in their last 13 games vs. a team with a losing S.U. record, 5-2 ATS in their last 7 games playing on 2 days rest and 4-1 ATS in their last 5 games overall.
Pistons have won both meetings between the two this season (96-94 & 103-87 in Milwaukee). I'm not seeing the bucks losing this one.....unless they sh*t the bed like vs the Cavs (giving up a late 20 point lead).
Both teams are prone to have low scoring quarters, so I just need one of those and they will stay below the 200 mark!
[write ups from my blog]
GL all on your plays
0
For tonight my plays are
Bucks -1.5 (2 units)
Bucks x Pistons UNDER 201 (2.5 units)
The Pistons are just 5-11 ATS in their last 16 games vs. a team with a winning S.U. record. The Bucks on the other hand are 9-4 ATS in their last 13 games vs. a team with a losing S.U. record, 5-2 ATS in their last 7 games playing on 2 days rest and 4-1 ATS in their last 5 games overall.
Pistons have won both meetings between the two this season (96-94 & 103-87 in Milwaukee). I'm not seeing the bucks losing this one.....unless they sh*t the bed like vs the Cavs (giving up a late 20 point lead).
Both teams are prone to have low scoring quarters, so I just need one of those and they will stay below the 200 mark!
So if we're a US resident we can't play. What do we do, send the money to you and have you play for us. Damn, I was planning on getting into it, is there any solution for us, Mavin?
It seems really unfair - I know. I personally asked people I know on behalf of my friends and relatives residing in the US - and I was promised that the subject is worked on and looked into. As soon as I will know - I will let you all know. But I gotta warn you that those who take US residents - are acting against the law right now and can be persecuted and your money lost. Unless I can make sure that is not the case, I would recommend US residents not to engage in it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by oreooreo1:
So if we're a US resident we can't play. What do we do, send the money to you and have you play for us. Damn, I was planning on getting into it, is there any solution for us, Mavin?
It seems really unfair - I know. I personally asked people I know on behalf of my friends and relatives residing in the US - and I was promised that the subject is worked on and looked into. As soon as I will know - I will let you all know. But I gotta warn you that those who take US residents - are acting against the law right now and can be persecuted and your money lost. Unless I can make sure that is not the case, I would recommend US residents not to engage in it.
Very true, 65% of capping in baseball is relative to the starting pichers and who is behind the plate and what kind of strike zone that ump has, took me almost half the season last year to figure that out for myself...
0
Quote Originally Posted by greengiants:
Very true, 65% of capping in baseball is relative to the starting pichers and who is behind the plate and what kind of strike zone that ump has, took me almost half the season last year to figure that out for myself...
The Pistons are just 5-11 ATS in their last 16 games vs. a team with a winning S.U. record. The Bucks on the other hand are 9-4 ATS in their last 13 games vs. a team with a losing S.U. record, 5-2 ATS in their last 7 games playing on 2 days rest and 4-1 ATS in their last 5 games overall.
Pistons have won both meetings between the two this season (96-94 & 103-87 in Milwaukee). I'm not seeing the bucks losing this one.....unless they sh*t the bed like vs the Cavs (giving up a late 20 point lead).
Both teams are prone to have low scoring quarters, so I just need one of those and they will stay below the 200 mark!
[write ups from my blog]
GL all on your plays
GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by 2SpreadKiller:
For tonight my plays are
Bucks -1.5 (2 units)
Bucks x Pistons UNDER 201 (2.5 units)
The Pistons are just 5-11 ATS in their last 16 games vs. a team with a winning S.U. record. The Bucks on the other hand are 9-4 ATS in their last 13 games vs. a team with a losing S.U. record, 5-2 ATS in their last 7 games playing on 2 days rest and 4-1 ATS in their last 5 games overall.
Pistons have won both meetings between the two this season (96-94 & 103-87 in Milwaukee). I'm not seeing the bucks losing this one.....unless they sh*t the bed like vs the Cavs (giving up a late 20 point lead).
Both teams are prone to have low scoring quarters, so I just need one of those and they will stay below the 200 mark!
Why do some people always want a new thread. I always review the first few pages. How hard is it to navigate to the most recent. Do they not know they don't have to go thur it page by page?
0
Why do some people always want a new thread. I always review the first few pages. How hard is it to navigate to the most recent. Do they not know they don't have to go thur it page by page?
But, I'll go with Portland here at least at the first half.
Final:
PORTLAND Trail Blazers -1.5 First half (-110) 110$
Final:
PORTLAND Trail Blazers - DALLAS Mavericks Over 202.5 (-110) 110$
I don't think we're about to see a high scoring game in Staples Center - but I will stay out of that one.
Interesting. It's almost a heads-up battle between the two of the most frequent NBA forum posters on here.
Looking ahead to tomorrow - do you think Boston's offense will be any good against the lowly Sacramento? I'm sure they will bring just as much defense as they normally do, but scoring with Paul Pierce for a point guard could be challenging. I'm torn between the Under and Boston -7 in this game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
Difficult card today.
But, I'll go with Portland here at least at the first half.
Final:
PORTLAND Trail Blazers -1.5 First half (-110) 110$
Final:
PORTLAND Trail Blazers - DALLAS Mavericks Over 202.5 (-110) 110$
I don't think we're about to see a high scoring game in Staples Center - but I will stay out of that one.
Interesting. It's almost a heads-up battle between the two of the most frequent NBA forum posters on here.
Looking ahead to tomorrow - do you think Boston's offense will be any good against the lowly Sacramento? I'm sure they will bring just as much defense as they normally do, but scoring with Paul Pierce for a point guard could be challenging. I'm torn between the Under and Boston -7 in this game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
