Has anyone made any money betting on sports steadily throughout the past year? 'cause I did! See how

This game should have been over before OT by 4- if what you said above was intercepted and buzzzzzzzzzzzed so it could not be understood.

Dont forget the message to the Refs-

So much Drama- but it worked in my favor for the most part- could have used one less basked or 5 less for other things- All in all can't complain to get what I got on a fix getting unfixed.

ill just say it right now and format and explain later.

SA - GS

i will be taking over 49-50 1Q. im thinking that will be the line when it comes out.

also will most probably be on GS+7 and ( o98 1half or GS +1.5 1Q)

we must look at similar things when analyzing games- Leaning the same way on most things- Still on the fence on the total for half and game- I had both wrong last time but that included a 6 min no point stretch from GS. I was able to hedge with an under in OT live as you may have read but the trend has been to go under total and adjust live (except for game 1 which went over by a couple of buckets)

I was just trying to also point out what you were saying about the game being scripted.

I will add that the refs tried hard very hard to get OKC to win late- That out of bound play was pure drama and bs jackson was practically holding the ball when he went out of bounds.

and someone on the off season please get rid of that kevin durant rule of swinging the arms and getting a foul that its either off foul or no call.

no comprendo 

Things worked out for the most part last night. I think the Bulls as expected have waved the white flag, thrown in the towel. It was just a matter of time before a bench less team gave up because of all the minutes the players have been forced to play. They had no legs no spark even Nate was quiet. Now the line in MIA is as high as other games- I don't know if Bulls try to make one last push early then head away to their vacation homes and regroup next year. That being said the Heat do not like the Bulls so they would not hesitate to pound them. I am not touching this line for now, maybe on a 3 team teaser but that may be about it. Time to start looking at Knicks and Pacers, either team matches well with Heat but I don't see how they can beat a team that is healthy and in sync.

As for the Grizz game I think the better team won, late in the season OKC even with Westbrook showed they have issues closing the tight games. This was first spotted when they lost at Home to Nuggets, then lost a close one to the Grizz in Memphis, then Wolves, Knicks, Bucks same deal all on the tail end of the season. I think this has more to do with coaching, play calling and clock management than talent. That being said I am on Grizz again if they win fine, if they lose series should end the following game after a loss. Only 8 Teams have comeback from 3-1 in NBA- in NHL it is 20- it almost became 21 last night if not for the miracle comeback by the Bruins.

Today leaning GS for same reason as the other games, young team more hunger, and while it may be warranted I don't know that Spurs deserve all the juice they get on their lines. Sure there is a lot of talent and alot of rings and accolades in that team but that is in the past, if experience won everytime the Super Bowl should have been won by someone other than the Raven. I think youth plays a big part. I think that is what drives GS- again the key for them is they have to shoot 50% or better from the floor and get the offensive board, keep bogut out of foul trouble and have curry and thompson drop some 3s get ahead then learn to manage the end of the game- that is the one thing that youth lacks is ability to close.

Interesting trend so far as far as I can recall all the OT games in the playoffs in NBA have gone the way of the home team.

got me thinking about GS+7 right now.

I think yesterday the refs had an agenda and somehow it backfired- GS is not a team that prides on D or hacking people so it may not be an issue but not sure- i don't do ref scouting - need to learn how to look for this stuff.

Yup lots of phantom fouls on bogut last time.

Ha ha ha

Yesterday for me was one of those almost days in betting, only supporting or trading.

In Binaries I went 1-1 but had 2-0 in the hat and right after the expity time also would have gone 2-0 but I ;ll take that split as I seldom split but that is OK.

In Hockey I wanted the series between my Leafs and one my best friend's Rangers. Well, we almost had it and already were ready to make flight arrangements to attend the whole series together both with our team's jerseys on and then you know what happened - his Rangers went through and my useless floor math Leafs managed to squander the lead, the game and the series in 1.5 minutes (2 goals) and in another 5 the third one.

In NBA I was right on with the Thunder who did exactly what were they supposed to do with precision to be desired by rocket scientist and managed to squander a lead, then the game and finally the cover. What can I say - at least you can partially have your tail up

That sucked that you had plans that were ruined, I however am all about the money but I understand what you are saying.

As for the Thunder doing exactly what you said you are right, however this was my analysis...

"The Grizz are the better team as the teams stand- OKC is relying on trying to outscore memphis and not defending- Memphis has only gotten in trouble in this series when they try to run with the Thunder, they need to play like what they are Bears tough and Physical a Bear will never out run puma like animal- I think that if they saw the film they will see that when they slowed it down played D and looked for Gasol and Zebo in the paint they were in total control, turnovers and fast break points almost did them in the last game. If they stick to this game plan they win, if they decide to have a track meet they will lose."

Yes, I do like GS as well 

GS Warriors +7

GS Warriors +7

Under 195 SA Spurs - GS Warriors

Under 101 TT SA Spurs

I think GS will get off to a quick start, can they close- they have closed two times and came close the other two- lets see. This means that for my under to hit Spurs have to be controlled under 100 pts-

-310$