Thank you for the system Jeff. Today is the 1st day I will be following and it looks to be a tough one vs Wainright. Looking forward to building the bankroll up to May 2nd.
0
Thank you for the system Jeff. Today is the 1st day I will be following and it looks to be a tough one vs Wainright. Looking forward to building the bankroll up to May 2nd.
Little tip & god knows if it was said before but the game # can be found at any online book, Vegas book, local book, the #'s are the same everywhere. So if SBR is down or whatever the case remember where you place your bet and it will be there. Best of luck!
Ps if this was said before sorry in advance, just looking out. Good luck!
0
Little tip & god knows if it was said before but the game # can be found at any online book, Vegas book, local book, the #'s are the same everywhere. So if SBR is down or whatever the case remember where you place your bet and it will be there. Best of luck!
Ps if this was said before sorry in advance, just looking out. Good luck!
Ok so I went to SBRodds.com and see the first game up (Cubs). Now how do you rank this game using the tier system A,B,C?
WOW, I find it hard to believe that the GREAT Santini doesn't get it. (A) = Bet # 1 Period. If it wins, the next bet is (A) GET IT ?? If it's a loss, the next bet is (B). SEE HOW THAT WORKS ?? If (B) wins, the next bet is (A) ect, ect, ect. I hope that clears it up.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGreatSantini:
Ok so I went to SBRodds.com and see the first game up (Cubs). Now how do you rank this game using the tier system A,B,C?
WOW, I find it hard to believe that the GREAT Santini doesn't get it. (A) = Bet # 1 Period. If it wins, the next bet is (A) GET IT ?? If it's a loss, the next bet is (B). SEE HOW THAT WORKS ?? If (B) wins, the next bet is (A) ect, ect, ect. I hope that clears it up.
If you win Boston, or game E, that would be a 1 unit profit
dude, why are you so concerned? Go ask your mom if you can go outside and play...get some fun, play some ball with the neighborhood kids...if they are not already sick of you that is...and that potential 1 unit win you speak of is 1 unit more than you have given out to the forum. Kick rocks buddy!
0
Quote Originally Posted by m0rtgageguy:
1.5 / 1
3.75 / 2.5
9.37 / 6.25 [(1.5+3.75+1)*1.5]
23.43 / 15.62
If you win Boston, or game E, that would be a 1 unit profit
dude, why are you so concerned? Go ask your mom if you can go outside and play...get some fun, play some ball with the neighborhood kids...if they are not already sick of you that is...and that potential 1 unit win you speak of is 1 unit more than you have given out to the forum. Kick rocks buddy!
It's hard not to comment with so many flighty critics. First, yes I know about the Martingale system, but what makes this a bit different is that is based on following the first rotation underdog. I agree that perhaps any rotation number chased could produce positive results, but only true facts and figures could disapprove the choice of the first rotation number. I also think there may be something to a previous posters comment of the first rotation being one where gamblers are chomping at the bit and typically choose the favorite. It makes sense that regular money could be made on degenerates wanting early action and typically going with the favorite. On top of this, Hat has kept records that can easily be back checked for accuracy of these results. I agree that any chase system can be risky and I have seen the super informative numbers calculated stipulating the price of a full chase run up to the E game, but as the facts and figures have shown, rarely, if at all, does a chase go to the E game. Knowing this, and how at least this year has gone, rarely if at all, do games go to the E game. With this being known, people can generally build large accounts to support the E game when necessary! So far, for all nah sayers, the money earned just from A games, could support one through the process to the E game without serious risk or worry. This is important in considering the worst case scenario. It is easy to calculate the numbers as if every run went to the E game and to protest the system's worthiness, theorizing a so called F game. The problem is that this system is working now and while one may compute the odds of it lasting, it is working and in my calculations, anyone that would quit at the E game would still come out as a winner at this point. I agree that chases will eventually fail, but considering that this has been back tested five years, and has been stellar his year, one can choose to point out the inevitable failure, or cash in on the current, and last five year success! I do not typically subscribe to conspiracy theories, but it does seem very suspicious that most of the harsh critiscms are coming from NEW subscribers. It makes me wonder?! Most importantly, NO ONE is making you bet on any of these games or buy into the system. Please, get the trick out of this thread unless you have something intelligent to say that challenges the claims of this system! What makes most of your ignorant comments invalid is that you do not seem to address all aspects of the success of this system. If you are trying to save newbies from the Martingale system, it would would benefit you to do so intellectually with facts and with a complete understanding of the success of this adjusted system that has thus far proven itself. Otherwise, u discredit yourself to educated followers such as my self that is starting to become suspicious of covers. Bottom line, it has been working, no one is forcing your hand, and if you don't have something constructive to say intellectually, please, bug off!
I will try to be intellectual for you, cause you sound like a brilliant man. How do you figure that a bettor that quits at the E game "would still come out as a winner at this point". Can you explain that?
0
Quote Originally Posted by bud7:
It's hard not to comment with so many flighty critics. First, yes I know about the Martingale system, but what makes this a bit different is that is based on following the first rotation underdog. I agree that perhaps any rotation number chased could produce positive results, but only true facts and figures could disapprove the choice of the first rotation number. I also think there may be something to a previous posters comment of the first rotation being one where gamblers are chomping at the bit and typically choose the favorite. It makes sense that regular money could be made on degenerates wanting early action and typically going with the favorite. On top of this, Hat has kept records that can easily be back checked for accuracy of these results. I agree that any chase system can be risky and I have seen the super informative numbers calculated stipulating the price of a full chase run up to the E game, but as the facts and figures have shown, rarely, if at all, does a chase go to the E game. Knowing this, and how at least this year has gone, rarely if at all, do games go to the E game. With this being known, people can generally build large accounts to support the E game when necessary! So far, for all nah sayers, the money earned just from A games, could support one through the process to the E game without serious risk or worry. This is important in considering the worst case scenario. It is easy to calculate the numbers as if every run went to the E game and to protest the system's worthiness, theorizing a so called F game. The problem is that this system is working now and while one may compute the odds of it lasting, it is working and in my calculations, anyone that would quit at the E game would still come out as a winner at this point. I agree that chases will eventually fail, but considering that this has been back tested five years, and has been stellar his year, one can choose to point out the inevitable failure, or cash in on the current, and last five year success! I do not typically subscribe to conspiracy theories, but it does seem very suspicious that most of the harsh critiscms are coming from NEW subscribers. It makes me wonder?! Most importantly, NO ONE is making you bet on any of these games or buy into the system. Please, get the trick out of this thread unless you have something intelligent to say that challenges the claims of this system! What makes most of your ignorant comments invalid is that you do not seem to address all aspects of the success of this system. If you are trying to save newbies from the Martingale system, it would would benefit you to do so intellectually with facts and with a complete understanding of the success of this adjusted system that has thus far proven itself. Otherwise, u discredit yourself to educated followers such as my self that is starting to become suspicious of covers. Bottom line, it has been working, no one is forcing your hand, and if you don't have something constructive to say intellectually, please, bug off!
I will try to be intellectual for you, cause you sound like a brilliant man. How do you figure that a bettor that quits at the E game "would still come out as a winner at this point". Can you explain that?
I will try to be intellectual for you, cause you sound like a brilliant man. How do you figure that a bettor that quits at the E game "would still come out as a winner at this point". Can you explain that?
It's very simple.
-Get on the streets on the Saturday night
-Find an alley behind the fa.g village
-Suck c0ck until you've recouped the 100 unit to chase that 1 unit so you can come in here and your how you're still 500-0, disregarding all the losing plays.
JEFF's plays provide the insights equivalent to a Roulette's martingale, except you're laying a cumulative 10%-25% juice (depending on how steep the favorite is) instead of the 3.5% house edge.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman:
I will try to be intellectual for you, cause you sound like a brilliant man. How do you figure that a bettor that quits at the E game "would still come out as a winner at this point". Can you explain that?
It's very simple.
-Get on the streets on the Saturday night
-Find an alley behind the fa.g village
-Suck c0ck until you've recouped the 100 unit to chase that 1 unit so you can come in here and your how you're still 500-0, disregarding all the losing plays.
JEFF's plays provide the insights equivalent to a Roulette's martingale, except you're laying a cumulative 10%-25% juice (depending on how steep the favorite is) instead of the 3.5% house edge.
In hockey it had a decent chance to work since the teams are not getting outscored as easily than in baseball but with the MLB i just figured it will never work. I am leaving this system good luck to all
0
In hockey it had a decent chance to work since the teams are not getting outscored as easily than in baseball but with the MLB i just figured it will never work. I am leaving this system good luck to all
I was here for Cisco's system meltdown, in case anyone wants to research that. Truthfully, I hope it doesn't happen for you guys tailing, I don't think I ever tail this system since my betting parameters don't have me going for plays above -145ish but GL to you all, regardless..
0
I was here for Cisco's system meltdown, in case anyone wants to research that. Truthfully, I hope it doesn't happen for you guys tailing, I don't think I ever tail this system since my betting parameters don't have me going for plays above -145ish but GL to you all, regardless..
Everything is posted you need. By the way this a tracking system. 
Established in 1995,
Sorry the un-official play is BOS +1.5 (D) 
LETS DO THIS
Hot Forum Topics
