A game must close within the line thresh hold we provide. At no point in time was there ever stated that if the threshold is met at any point, it's deemed a play. That is just the twisting around of words.
A GAME MUST CLOSE. I don't really know how to clarify that any better.
One last question, how do I bet a game after the lines close? Live betting? Sorry but my time machine is a foreign model, in the shop, they're waiting for a part.
Thanks for clarifying that a game's MUST close even though he made an official play yesterday hours before the start - I guess it was "locked in"?
By the way all silliness aside I hope Both CIN and MIN hit although I don't have CIN.
BOL and why not remove all the confusion, showcase the system by doing it and all of us a solid - post the plays, it's that easy - or, let me guess, you have the same time machine I have and you too are waiting for a part. Bummer dude.
The pen is mightier than the pigs
0
Quote Originally Posted by ProudJagsfan:
A game must close within the line thresh hold we provide. At no point in time was there ever stated that if the threshold is met at any point, it's deemed a play. That is just the twisting around of words.
A GAME MUST CLOSE. I don't really know how to clarify that any better.
One last question, how do I bet a game after the lines close? Live betting? Sorry but my time machine is a foreign model, in the shop, they're waiting for a part.
Thanks for clarifying that a game's MUST close even though he made an official play yesterday hours before the start - I guess it was "locked in"?
By the way all silliness aside I hope Both CIN and MIN hit although I don't have CIN.
BOL and why not remove all the confusion, showcase the system by doing it and all of us a solid - post the plays, it's that easy - or, let me guess, you have the same time machine I have and you too are waiting for a part. Bummer dude.
Some of these dudes here amaze me ( Beans / Vega ) evidently this thread peeks your interest and you guys keep coming back to chime in. If you don't like how this is operating, then just leave for good. I posted my damn play over an hour ago ! Me ! Not Jags , 1515 , DLA , or anyone else . I bet it for 5 units win or loose. If this system turns out to be a dud, then I'll back off of it. I trust the guy who came up with the system so I'll follow for a 5 day grace period to see if it's worth it to me or not . This forum is for collaboration so I thought, that's why good people always leave here and never come back ...
Bro, no disrespect intended, I absolutely abhor being this guy that I am now in this thread. I am truly sorry.
I am a quant programmer and I absolutely hate ambiguity. This thread and the deleted ones ooze with double talk and ambiguity -the concepts may be new to me and/or other people yet the promotors of this system that you are on the fringe of being refuse to do something every handicapper does and that is post the play when it becomes a play - before game time - we have all posted leans and that's fine.
I am still having an issue with getting to the closing line and going back to somehow make a bet after the game closes.
I am here since the beginning 4 days ago because a piece of this system is someting I have used a lot since 2015 MLB.
Thanks for your clarification that your play is currently not one to be counted in this system - because as we all know we need to know the closing line beforehand, and no one else is actually posting plays.
The pen is mightier than the pigs
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rolexsports:
Some of these dudes here amaze me ( Beans / Vega ) evidently this thread peeks your interest and you guys keep coming back to chime in. If you don't like how this is operating, then just leave for good. I posted my damn play over an hour ago ! Me ! Not Jags , 1515 , DLA , or anyone else . I bet it for 5 units win or loose. If this system turns out to be a dud, then I'll back off of it. I trust the guy who came up with the system so I'll follow for a 5 day grace period to see if it's worth it to me or not . This forum is for collaboration so I thought, that's why good people always leave here and never come back ...
Bro, no disrespect intended, I absolutely abhor being this guy that I am now in this thread. I am truly sorry.
I am a quant programmer and I absolutely hate ambiguity. This thread and the deleted ones ooze with double talk and ambiguity -the concepts may be new to me and/or other people yet the promotors of this system that you are on the fringe of being refuse to do something every handicapper does and that is post the play when it becomes a play - before game time - we have all posted leans and that's fine.
I am still having an issue with getting to the closing line and going back to somehow make a bet after the game closes.
I am here since the beginning 4 days ago because a piece of this system is someting I have used a lot since 2015 MLB.
Thanks for your clarification that your play is currently not one to be counted in this system - because as we all know we need to know the closing line beforehand, and no one else is actually posting plays.
that was deep DLA, you and Jags own your own medical practice too? :) Listen....said it a dozen times, and maybe now its starting to happen. Post the plays. Those who want to follow can, those who want to track can. But this mumbo jumbo and silliness is just that, silly. Curious to see how day two goes since day one was a dud. GL. And no i dont watch porn all day, just maybe 20 mins or so here and there
0
that was deep DLA, you and Jags own your own medical practice too? :) Listen....said it a dozen times, and maybe now its starting to happen. Post the plays. Those who want to follow can, those who want to track can. But this mumbo jumbo and silliness is just that, silly. Curious to see how day two goes since day one was a dud. GL. And no i dont watch porn all day, just maybe 20 mins or so here and there
Beans you seem like a smart dude. I think you're misunderstanding what Jags was talking about after he tried to clarify several times. PM DLA, maybe he'll accept your request and give you what you're looking for or maybe he won't . Reds is a play so far . Thank you ..
0
Beans you seem like a smart dude. I think you're misunderstanding what Jags was talking about after he tried to clarify several times. PM DLA, maybe he'll accept your request and give you what you're looking for or maybe he won't . Reds is a play so far . Thank you ..
Beans you seem like a smart dude. I think you're misunderstanding what Jags was talking about after he tried to clarify several times. PM DLA, maybe he'll accept your request and give you what you're looking for or maybe he won't . Reds is a play so far . Thank you ..
How is CIN a play? A play for you as you previously stated or a play in this system to be counted?
We don't know the closing line yet.
It was written "A game must close within the line thresh hold we provide. At no point in time was there ever stated that if the threshold is met at any point, it's deemed a play. That is just the twisting around of words.
A GAME MUST CLOSE. I don't really know how to clarify that any better."
MUST CLOSE is pretty clear to me - although somehow I am twisting words Why was I confused and twisting words? Capper in his first thread posted two plays before the close and yesterday they posted TB hours before the close.
Here is yesterday's thread:
"Mets +111 (must close at +110 or lower)
Jays +174 (must close +140 or lower)
Twins +102 (must close at +101 or lower)
A's +115 (must close at +114 or lower)
Lock in when you feel comfortable. Last night the Rays were able to be locked in rather early. Dogs can only be +140 at the max,"
Now it seems we are still waiting to learn what "locked in" means. I was silly and twisted that to mean "BET THE GAME"
The pen is mightier than the pigs
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rolexsports:
Beans you seem like a smart dude. I think you're misunderstanding what Jags was talking about after he tried to clarify several times. PM DLA, maybe he'll accept your request and give you what you're looking for or maybe he won't . Reds is a play so far . Thank you ..
How is CIN a play? A play for you as you previously stated or a play in this system to be counted?
We don't know the closing line yet.
It was written "A game must close within the line thresh hold we provide. At no point in time was there ever stated that if the threshold is met at any point, it's deemed a play. That is just the twisting around of words.
A GAME MUST CLOSE. I don't really know how to clarify that any better."
MUST CLOSE is pretty clear to me - although somehow I am twisting words Why was I confused and twisting words? Capper in his first thread posted two plays before the close and yesterday they posted TB hours before the close.
Here is yesterday's thread:
"Mets +111 (must close at +110 or lower)
Jays +174 (must close +140 or lower)
Twins +102 (must close at +101 or lower)
A's +115 (must close at +114 or lower)
Lock in when you feel comfortable. Last night the Rays were able to be locked in rather early. Dogs can only be +140 at the max,"
Now it seems we are still waiting to learn what "locked in" means. I was silly and twisted that to mean "BET THE GAME"
Geez, you are trying hard to find ambiguities. Even though I already explained this one.
Rule of thumb: lean becomes a play after 10-15 dollar drop below highest allowable closing number because after such a drop the line probably won't move back back past the highest allowable closing number. But you can wait until closer to game time to lock it in if you feel comfortable. Play must close at or below highest allowable closing number for it to be a play. In the game-time decisions, you will have to sit there a couple minutes before first pitch and look at Pinnacle and see. Check the SBR odds page in order to do so. He has eliminated the game-time decision. Reds, who dropped more than 10-15 dollars are a play as long as the line doesn't move back, which it likely won't. So you can feel free to lock in Reds
0
Geez, you are trying hard to find ambiguities. Even though I already explained this one.
Rule of thumb: lean becomes a play after 10-15 dollar drop below highest allowable closing number because after such a drop the line probably won't move back back past the highest allowable closing number. But you can wait until closer to game time to lock it in if you feel comfortable. Play must close at or below highest allowable closing number for it to be a play. In the game-time decisions, you will have to sit there a couple minutes before first pitch and look at Pinnacle and see. Check the SBR odds page in order to do so. He has eliminated the game-time decision. Reds, who dropped more than 10-15 dollars are a play as long as the line doesn't move back, which it likely won't. So you can feel free to lock in Reds
So Cincy is a play not just because it met the thresh hold, but because it met the 10-15 dollar rule of thumb. It can be comfortably locked in already, and it is a play, as long as it doesn't get bet back the other way past the thresh hold, which is highly unlikely.
0
So Cincy is a play not just because it met the thresh hold, but because it met the 10-15 dollar rule of thumb. It can be comfortably locked in already, and it is a play, as long as it doesn't get bet back the other way past the thresh hold, which is highly unlikely.
O hey, here's my best German, in case that helps clarify things.
Also ist Cincy eine gute Wette, nicht nur weil es die erwuenschte Nummer erreicht hat, sondern auch weil es um 10-15 dollars weniger weiter runtergewettet wurde. Man kann auf Cincy also bequem wetten, und Cincy ist eine gute Wette, solange es nicht in die andere richtung hochgewettet wird, was sehr unwahrscheinlich ist.
0
O hey, here's my best German, in case that helps clarify things.
Also ist Cincy eine gute Wette, nicht nur weil es die erwuenschte Nummer erreicht hat, sondern auch weil es um 10-15 dollars weniger weiter runtergewettet wurde. Man kann auf Cincy also bequem wetten, und Cincy ist eine gute Wette, solange es nicht in die andere richtung hochgewettet wird, was sehr unwahrscheinlich ist.
Lol that show made me angry sometimes, conceptually a tad tedious, it's like ok making fun of the germans, great. There were a bunch of better sitcoms at the time imo, with war-setting too, like MASH
0
Lol that show made me angry sometimes, conceptually a tad tedious, it's like ok making fun of the germans, great. There were a bunch of better sitcoms at the time imo, with war-setting too, like MASH
Lol that show made me angry sometimes, conceptually a tad tedious, it's like ok making fun of the germans, great. There were a bunch of better sitcoms at the time imo, with war-setting too, like MASH
MASH ('72 - '83) came after Hogan's Heroes ('65 - '71)
I agree, Hogan's was tedious at times. MASH was good until it got too serious (when Alda took control and started spewing his political slant in every episode)
0
Quote Originally Posted by ProudJagsfan:
Lol that show made me angry sometimes, conceptually a tad tedious, it's like ok making fun of the germans, great. There were a bunch of better sitcoms at the time imo, with war-setting too, like MASH
MASH ('72 - '83) came after Hogan's Heroes ('65 - '71)
I agree, Hogan's was tedious at times. MASH was good until it got too serious (when Alda took control and started spewing his political slant in every episode)
So Cincy is a play not just because it met the thresh hold, but because it met the 10-15 dollar rule of thumb. It can be comfortably locked in already, and it is a play, as long as it doesn't get bet back the other way past the thresh hold, which is highly unlikely.
So is it an official play to be counted in the already convoluted record? YES or NO.
I'll make it easy just quote me and respond YES or NO - it's not a lot of typing.
The pen is mightier than the pigs
0
Quote Originally Posted by ProudJagsfan:
So Cincy is a play not just because it met the thresh hold, but because it met the 10-15 dollar rule of thumb. It can be comfortably locked in already, and it is a play, as long as it doesn't get bet back the other way past the thresh hold, which is highly unlikely.
So is it an official play to be counted in the already convoluted record? YES or NO.
I'll make it easy just quote me and respond YES or NO - it's not a lot of typing.
MASH ('72 - '83) came after Hogan's Heroes ('65 - '71)
I agree, Hogan's was tedious at times. MASH was good until it got too serious (when Alda took control and started spewing his political slant in every episode)
It's really a knock on a show when it becomes something that it's not supposed to be, in this case politicized. Imo, part of the allure of sitcoms (and non-news TV shows in general) is escapist, and the hammering of politics brings the viewer back to real-world reality. MASH is the mega liberal counterpart to Last Man Standing, current sitcom featuring Tim Allen, who feels entitled to use his stage to defend the conservative platform in practically every episode.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HoustonSports:
MASH ('72 - '83) came after Hogan's Heroes ('65 - '71)
I agree, Hogan's was tedious at times. MASH was good until it got too serious (when Alda took control and started spewing his political slant in every episode)
It's really a knock on a show when it becomes something that it's not supposed to be, in this case politicized. Imo, part of the allure of sitcoms (and non-news TV shows in general) is escapist, and the hammering of politics brings the viewer back to real-world reality. MASH is the mega liberal counterpart to Last Man Standing, current sitcom featuring Tim Allen, who feels entitled to use his stage to defend the conservative platform in practically every episode.
It's really a knock on a show when it becomes something that it's not supposed to be, in this case politicized. Imo, part of the allure of sitcoms (and non-news TV shows in general) is escapist, and the hammering of politics brings the viewer back to real-world reality. MASH is the mega liberal counterpart to Last Man Standing, current sitcom featuring Tim Allen, who feels entitled to use his stage to defend the conservative platform in practically every episode.
I agree as I would watch MASH because it is (supposed to be) a comedy, not because I want to watch political crap. Although I am sure that you are correct about Tim Allen and his show, I have never watched it and watch very few tv shows that are 'current'
0
Quote Originally Posted by ProudJagsfan:
It's really a knock on a show when it becomes something that it's not supposed to be, in this case politicized. Imo, part of the allure of sitcoms (and non-news TV shows in general) is escapist, and the hammering of politics brings the viewer back to real-world reality. MASH is the mega liberal counterpart to Last Man Standing, current sitcom featuring Tim Allen, who feels entitled to use his stage to defend the conservative platform in practically every episode.
I agree as I would watch MASH because it is (supposed to be) a comedy, not because I want to watch political crap. Although I am sure that you are correct about Tim Allen and his show, I have never watched it and watch very few tv shows that are 'current'
I agree as I would watch MASH because it is (supposed to be) a comedy, not because I want to watch political crap. Although I am sure that you are correct about Tim Allen and his show, I have never watched it and watch very few tv shows that are 'current'
It's a bummer about Alda, because Hawkeye was probably the coolest character imo. He was cool because he was self-confident, smooth and a bit reserved. He was super nice to the wounded soldiers. And watching him mock Frank and Hot Lips (the only two characters who could get on my nerves, it seems like every sitcom has these--like Screech on Saved by the Bell or Florence in The Jeffersons) with sarcastic derision was amusing. I was fine with him always wanting the war to end, that was already Klinger's deal from day 1 with the hilarious cross-dressing, but being a political propagandist as well didn't fit in.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HoustonSports:
I agree as I would watch MASH because it is (supposed to be) a comedy, not because I want to watch political crap. Although I am sure that you are correct about Tim Allen and his show, I have never watched it and watch very few tv shows that are 'current'
It's a bummer about Alda, because Hawkeye was probably the coolest character imo. He was cool because he was self-confident, smooth and a bit reserved. He was super nice to the wounded soldiers. And watching him mock Frank and Hot Lips (the only two characters who could get on my nerves, it seems like every sitcom has these--like Screech on Saved by the Bell or Florence in The Jeffersons) with sarcastic derision was amusing. I was fine with him always wanting the war to end, that was already Klinger's deal from day 1 with the hilarious cross-dressing, but being a political propagandist as well didn't fit in.
can you elaborate on how you came up with ROI of -12% for Cincy? -120x48%=-5760, 100x52%=5200, 5100-5760= -660, -660/100= -6.6%. Did I miss something? Thx.
0
can you elaborate on how you came up with ROI of -12% for Cincy? -120x48%=-5760, 100x52%=5200, 5100-5760= -660, -660/100= -6.6%. Did I miss something? Thx.
So Cincy is a play not just because it met the thresh hold, but because it met the 10-15 dollar rule of thumb. It can be comfortably locked in already, and it is a play, as long as it doesn't get bet back the other way past the thresh hold, which is highly unlikely.
Just wondering...if you place a bet on a team that falls into the 10-15 rule...but then let's say it does go back the threshold?
How do you get the money back on the bet? Do you guys suggest buying out if this scenario would occur?
Good Luck in this endeavor and anyone following.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ProudJagsfan:
So Cincy is a play not just because it met the thresh hold, but because it met the 10-15 dollar rule of thumb. It can be comfortably locked in already, and it is a play, as long as it doesn't get bet back the other way past the thresh hold, which is highly unlikely.
Just wondering...if you place a bet on a team that falls into the 10-15 rule...but then let's say it does go back the threshold?
How do you get the money back on the bet? Do you guys suggest buying out if this scenario would occur?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
BOL and why not remove all the confusion, showcase the system by doing it and all of us a solid - post the plays, it's that easy - or, let me guess, you have the same time machine I have and you too are waiting for a part. Bummer dude.
So is it an official play to be counted in the already convoluted record? YES or NO.
Hot Forum Topics
