columbo is prob closest to 100% CORRECT IN RE TO THE SITUATION...IF U WANT IT ALL, : PAY THE MAN, I TAKE WHAT I CAN GET LIKE THE LIL' FISH BY THE SHARK
bigFnPOO
0
columbo is prob closest to 100% CORRECT IN RE TO THE SITUATION...IF U WANT IT ALL, : PAY THE MAN, I TAKE WHAT I CAN GET LIKE THE LIL' FISH BY THE SHARK
No No. I don't want that. Just kidding about the purchase.
Really though, what is your goal posting on here and everything?
If you are going to be secretive about full disclosure, don't start any thread what-so-ever. If you like to help people make money, then there is no need to be secretive at all and hold things back. If you want compensation for your work and discovery, then show the data and sell it. If you want praise, then buddy you got it; certainly from me anyway.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hyvong:
Don't try to get him ban!!!
No No. I don't want that. Just kidding about the purchase.
Really though, what is your goal posting on here and everything?
If you are going to be secretive about full disclosure, don't start any thread what-so-ever. If you like to help people make money, then there is no need to be secretive at all and hold things back. If you want compensation for your work and discovery, then show the data and sell it. If you want praise, then buddy you got it; certainly from me anyway.
I think the thing is, Columbo, is that someone stole one of his systems and sold it. He enjoys, and I do too, looking for ways to beat the bookie. He has spent hours looking/researching and then some.....idiot does that. I can see why he might send out only part of the plays...it might mask the system.
Jeff's a good guy. He'll help you if you ask, or if you need help on a system. He won't slam you unless you're a troll.
No one is forced to play his or anyone's plays. We're getting these free and they win. Don't beat down a gift horse (or whatever that stupid saying is).
Keep it up, Jeff
0
I think the thing is, Columbo, is that someone stole one of his systems and sold it. He enjoys, and I do too, looking for ways to beat the bookie. He has spent hours looking/researching and then some.....idiot does that. I can see why he might send out only part of the plays...it might mask the system.
Jeff's a good guy. He'll help you if you ask, or if you need help on a system. He won't slam you unless you're a troll.
No one is forced to play his or anyone's plays. We're getting these free and they win. Don't beat down a gift horse (or whatever that stupid saying is).
I think the thing is, Columbo, is that someone stole one of his systems and sold it.
Honestly, I don't think anyone gave that guy a dime. He wanted $129 a month so he can tell you when not to make a play due to his "special" filtering system. Total joke.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BuckeyeKaptn:
I think the thing is, Columbo, is that someone stole one of his systems and sold it.
Honestly, I don't think anyone gave that guy a dime. He wanted $129 a month so he can tell you when not to make a play due to his "special" filtering system. Total joke.
Hat, Thanks for all your patience and hard work. Unfortunately we live in a unappreciative society where everyone thinks they are entitled to everything instead of just being grateful. I feel safe in speaking for about 90% of the people on here in just saying THANK YOU ! Two words that are not used enough daily...
0
Hat, Thanks for all your patience and hard work. Unfortunately we live in a unappreciative society where everyone thinks they are entitled to everything instead of just being grateful. I feel safe in speaking for about 90% of the people on here in just saying THANK YOU ! Two words that are not used enough daily...
Wow, we've played a total of 4 series. Meaning 4 sets of series. You'll have more than enough plays, most of you won't have the bankroll to play them all. I'm probably doing you a favor and you don't even realize it.
This is my 2nd year doing chases so i get the bankroll statement. What some dont realize is Chases are not sprints, but marathons where patience is key. Theyre gonna be multiple ups and downs, just gotta ride w/it. If they dont want to be patient Jeff, then they can go look for other betting techniques elsewhere better suited for them. Keep what youre doing Jeff, its working :)
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:
Wow, we've played a total of 4 series. Meaning 4 sets of series. You'll have more than enough plays, most of you won't have the bankroll to play them all. I'm probably doing you a favor and you don't even realize it.
This is my 2nd year doing chases so i get the bankroll statement. What some dont realize is Chases are not sprints, but marathons where patience is key. Theyre gonna be multiple ups and downs, just gotta ride w/it. If they dont want to be patient Jeff, then they can go look for other betting techniques elsewhere better suited for them. Keep what youre doing Jeff, its working :)
Wow, we've played a total of 4 series. Meaning 4 sets of series. You'll have more than enough plays, most of you won't have the bankroll to play them all. I'm probably doing you a favor and you don't even realize it.
Besides, i can care less if its 7, 70, 100, 700 chases total in the 4.5 months. Who cares how many chases it ends up being, if it profits, thats all that matters
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:
Wow, we've played a total of 4 series. Meaning 4 sets of series. You'll have more than enough plays, most of you won't have the bankroll to play them all. I'm probably doing you a favor and you don't even realize it.
Besides, i can care less if its 7, 70, 100, 700 chases total in the 4.5 months. Who cares how many chases it ends up being, if it profits, thats all that matters
This is unfortunate. If anyone did any work in the off season to reduce the risk of laying 146 units to win 1 that is all for nothing. With the reduction of units you would not be risking 60% on a F tier where prior you would risk 20%. Huge dif.
0
This is unfortunate. If anyone did any work in the off season to reduce the risk of laying 146 units to win 1 that is all for nothing. With the reduction of units you would not be risking 60% on a F tier where prior you would risk 20%. Huge dif.
Honestly, I don't think anyone gave that guy a dime. He wanted $129 a month so he can tell you when not to make a play due to his "special" filtering system. Total joke.
Good
0
Quote Originally Posted by bruin95:
Honestly, I don't think anyone gave that guy a dime. He wanted $129 a month so he can tell you when not to make a play due to his "special" filtering system. Total joke.
jeff,obviously no problem watsoever with you doing watever the hell you want with your system,thats your perogative and its awfully strange to have complaints from people getting sumthing for free.
wud it be possible to get a cupple answers to questions regarding it tho??just wondering if the same ratio of plays will be given going forward??ie.a third or watever it is?.........also,how is it determined which ones are selected and wat effect,if any,wud it have on the strike-rate??cus this has an effect on how people manage their b/rolls and assign units......thanks jeff
0
jeff,obviously no problem watsoever with you doing watever the hell you want with your system,thats your perogative and its awfully strange to have complaints from people getting sumthing for free.
wud it be possible to get a cupple answers to questions regarding it tho??just wondering if the same ratio of plays will be given going forward??ie.a third or watever it is?.........also,how is it determined which ones are selected and wat effect,if any,wud it have on the strike-rate??cus this has an effect on how people manage their b/rolls and assign units......thanks jeff
jeff,obviously no problem watsoever with you doing watever the hell you want with your system,thats your perogative and its awfully strange to have complaints from people getting sumthing for free.
wud it be possible to get a cupple answers to questions regarding it tho??just wondering if the same ratio of plays will be given going forward??ie.a third or watever it is?.........also,how is it determined which ones are selected and wat effect,if any,wud it have on the strike-rate??cus this has an effect on how people manage their b/rolls and assign units......thanks jeff
I can assure you the plays will increase, just hold on cause you might get more than you can handle.
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
jeff,obviously no problem watsoever with you doing watever the hell you want with your system,thats your perogative and its awfully strange to have complaints from people getting sumthing for free.
wud it be possible to get a cupple answers to questions regarding it tho??just wondering if the same ratio of plays will be given going forward??ie.a third or watever it is?.........also,how is it determined which ones are selected and wat effect,if any,wud it have on the strike-rate??cus this has an effect on how people manage their b/rolls and assign units......thanks jeff
I can assure you the plays will increase, just hold on cause you might get more than you can handle.
cool,thanks jeff...so we can continue using the unit sizing/bankroll that was assumed to be needed based on the historical results,then??cheers watever you decide
0
cool,thanks jeff...so we can continue using the unit sizing/bankroll that was assumed to be needed based on the historical results,then??cheers watever you decide
This is unfortunate. If anyone did any work in the off season to reduce the risk of laying 146 units to win 1 that is all for nothing. With the reduction of units you would not be risking 60% on a F tier where prior you would risk 20%. Huge dif.
Once again, NO ONE at ANY TIME is risking 146 units to win 1 unit. The last time I checked, there has never been a -1460 favorite in MLB history. When you're later in a chase, the money you are laying is winning back all the money you previously lost, not just one unit. When are people going to understand this. It's absolutely mind boggling the amount of cluelessness there is on these boards.
0
Quote Originally Posted by INTHEEND:
This is unfortunate. If anyone did any work in the off season to reduce the risk of laying 146 units to win 1 that is all for nothing. With the reduction of units you would not be risking 60% on a F tier where prior you would risk 20%. Huge dif.
Once again, NO ONE at ANY TIME is risking 146 units to win 1 unit. The last time I checked, there has never been a -1460 favorite in MLB history. When you're later in a chase, the money you are laying is winning back all the money you previously lost, not just one unit. When are people going to understand this. It's absolutely mind boggling the amount of cluelessness there is on these boards.
Once again, NO ONE at ANY TIME is risking 146 units to win 1 unit. The last time I checked, there has never been a -1460 favorite in MLB history. When you're later in a chase, the money you are laying is winning back all the money you previously lost, not just one unit. When are people going to understand this. It's absolutely mind boggling the amount of cluelessness there is on these boards.
I am tired of hearing this argument, everyone knows what they are saying. Of course someone is not wagering 146 units on a line of -1460 to win 1 unit. They speak figuratively and not literally..GEEEZ
But wize azz if you are going to keep a record of a chase system and not keeping exact figures on ALL loses. Then you are FIGURATIVELY wagering 146 units in order to win 1 unit, and only add one more win to your record.
Let me work this backwards for ya,,,lets say that Jeffros GSE does in fact lose one 6 game chase this year. The record will then be something like 542-1 which LITERALLY at this point that 1 in the L column represents 146 units. whereas if it had won on the 6th game then the record would have been ONLY INCREASED BY 1 unit.
Therefore you are in essence risking 146 units to win 1 unit. I hope this puts to rest this stupid azz argument.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bruin95:
Once again, NO ONE at ANY TIME is risking 146 units to win 1 unit. The last time I checked, there has never been a -1460 favorite in MLB history. When you're later in a chase, the money you are laying is winning back all the money you previously lost, not just one unit. When are people going to understand this. It's absolutely mind boggling the amount of cluelessness there is on these boards.
I am tired of hearing this argument, everyone knows what they are saying. Of course someone is not wagering 146 units on a line of -1460 to win 1 unit. They speak figuratively and not literally..GEEEZ
But wize azz if you are going to keep a record of a chase system and not keeping exact figures on ALL loses. Then you are FIGURATIVELY wagering 146 units in order to win 1 unit, and only add one more win to your record.
Let me work this backwards for ya,,,lets say that Jeffros GSE does in fact lose one 6 game chase this year. The record will then be something like 542-1 which LITERALLY at this point that 1 in the L column represents 146 units. whereas if it had won on the 6th game then the record would have been ONLY INCREASED BY 1 unit.
Therefore you are in essence risking 146 units to win 1 unit. I hope this puts to rest this stupid azz argument.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
AT I CAN GET LIKE THE LIL' FISH BY THE SHARK
.
Hot Forum Topics
