All Forums | Website Promotions

WEEK 9 - NFL Breakdown Sheets

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 74575
Posts: 282
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 374
Posted: #126

OK SD for pool and small play on KC plus to hedge

 

Thanks Guys

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6686
Posted: #127
also dont forget november is when san diego come to play
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 20621
Posted: #128
an diego while not flash are still a good team i mean look at what they did against the saints and broncos, they played well and choked. NORV WILL HAVE THEM EXTRA FOCUSED against a team faaaaar worse than the saints and the broncos.
[/Quote]
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 1219
Posted: #129
you guys are making me nervious. 
gota teaser NBA OKC +7.5 and ,,,,Either SD-1 or KC +14 

Was this close...I___I   to taking SD-1 until si1ly said KC could upset. 

I think I'm gonna stick with the numbers...thats the plan.   
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 323
Posted: #130

NFL
NFL
2 TEAM TEASER FB 6PTS / BK 4 PTS
[301] TOTAL o34½-110 (B+6) 
(KC CHIEFS vrs SD CHARGERS)
[302] SD CHARGERS -1½-110 (B+6)

220 / 200
Nov 01 08:30 PM 
INTERNET / -1

SD & OVER!!! 		Nov 01NFL
STRAIGHT BET
[3302] 1Q SD CHARGERS -3+115

200 / 230
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6686
Posted: #131
Quote Originally Posted by roondog248:

you guys are making me nervious. 
gota teaser NBA OKC +7.5 and ,,,,Either SD-1 or KC +14 

Was this close...I___I   to taking SD-1 until si1ly said KC could upset. 

I think I'm gonna stick with the numbers...thats the plan.   


dude you gotta go with what you think is right. silly is an excellent capper and i always look for his input to help me on plays but if you think san diego cover then take san diego. sillys numbers show a strong advantage to san diego and i think he is just finding ways to talk himself out of playing them
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 1554
Posted: #132
What about totals for tonight? So many people are on over but I can't see how inept KC's offense is in being able to score more than 14. As far as the chiefs D, I think they play with some pride to save face for their horrendous offense. This isn't just looking at last week's performance too...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #133
Quote Originally Posted by davopnz:



dude you gotta go with what you think is right. silly is an excellent capper and i always look for his input to help me on plays but if you think san diego cover then take san diego. sillys numbers show a strong advantage to san diego and i think he is just finding ways to talk himself out of playing them

I think you're right, that is what I'm doing.  But I don't think I'd be as successful a handicapper if I wasn't good at narrowing in on plays from leans.  If I can convince myself that the other side stands a chance - especially if I can reinforce that with some numbers (i.e. the Chiefs are projected to out gain SD on the ground) - then it's an effective way of avoiding those tighter games.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #134
Quote Originally Posted by mikesomoney:

What about totals for tonight? So many people are on over but I can't see how inept KC's offense is in being able to score more than 14. As far as the chiefs D, I think they play with some pride to save face for their horrendous offense. This isn't just looking at last week's performance too...

I'm expecting a lot of running plays by the Chiefs and that should work some clock.  My numbers projected the game at 40 I believe, so that also favors the under just slightly.  That's what I would go with, but ultimately I think the line is pretty fair.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6686
Posted: #135
I just think this is a great spot for san diego, they really need a win, and a big win.

i almost think the first half line could be the better play
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 88
Posted: #136
Bol 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6686
Posted: #137
line is down to -7, buy it down to -6.5 and we have 7 point advantage according to your stats
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #138
Good luck tonight guys.  I'm passing on the game altogether.  Even though the numbers show a strong advantage to San Diego on paper.. I can't get past the fact that Kansas City should be able to establish a solid running game.  In a divisional game, I'm not willing to lay over a touchdown on a team that I think will lose the rushing battle.  I'm also questioning the San Diego locker room and their ability to get up for a game on a short week.  I'd rather sit this one out.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6686
Posted: #139
ryan mathews will end this game with better stats than charles
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #140
Prediction:


Jamal Charles:  111 YDS

Ryan Mathews:  89 YDS


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #141
*those are rushing yards only.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #142
Enjoy the game!   
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 1219
Posted: #143
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 418
Posted: #144
Hey si1l,

I try not to bug ya but keep up the excellent work.

If you don't mind me asking, you had provided some details on how you're moving your focus in NBA in your model from the "four factors" to shooting accuracy and some new data. Can't find the post now. Care to elaborate any more on that? Does anyone have the link to that post?

I'm curious what kind of numbers you're going to use most for NBA and how you'll compile them.. 

Cheers !! 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 606
Posted: #145
Any thoughts on adding Houston?  I saw your sheet showed a huge advantage there and with the Texans.  This is the type of game where the Texans have been blowing out opponents all season.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #146
Quote Originally Posted by johnmillions:

Hey si1l,

I try not to bug ya but keep up the excellent work.

If you don't mind me asking, you had provided some details on how you're moving your focus in NBA in your model from the "four factors" to shooting accuracy and some new data. Can't find the post now. Care to elaborate any more on that? Does anyone have the link to that post?

I'm curious what kind of numbers you're going to use most for NBA and how you'll compile them.. 

Cheers !! 

I'll go into greater detail when I start publishing the sheets, but I can elaborate on my research findings to give you an idea on how it influenced the redesigning of my models.

If you're a traditionalist in terms of advanced NBA statistics, you'd swear by the 'four factors'.  Those are: offensive rebounding differential, free throw rate differential, turnover rate differential & effective field goal percentage differential.  Each of these four factors has a weight attached to it to describe how much of an influence it has on the outcome of a game.  Shooting (eFG%) was said to influence 45% of the game.  Turnovers 25%, Offensive Rebounding 20% and Free Throw's 10%.  These are just general guidelines and can fluxuate a few percentage points depending on the expected style of the game.  I believed this was true because people told me to.  Well, after losing 13 units in the regular season last year and hitting only 48%, I wanted to know why.. so I dug into the data.

I did a series of logistic regression studies using the last 12 years of data to extrapolate the relationship between the four factors and margin of victory and season winning percentage.  The results were surprising.  It turns out that offensive rebounding, turnovers and trips to the free throw line have almost no correlation to MOV and W%.  The only variable that does - and it does with an R^2 value of .857 - is effective field goal percentage.  The rest of the equation is superficial.  So I used simple logic to find out why.

Free throws are highly dependent upon home court advantage and how the refs are calling the game that night.  This is unfortunately quite inconsistent from game to game.  Even if you did have data to suggest an advantage on one team or another - you just couldn't be confident that it would play out that way in reality.

Offensive rebounding rate and turnover rate are essentially measures of possessions - and consequently field goal attempts.  The more rebounds and fewer turnovers, the more shot attempts.  It's really that simple.  In 2012, teams averaged 81 shots per game and made 36 of them.  Let's say Team A out-rebounds their opponent by +6 and forces a +4 turnover differential.  This would be considered a substantial advantage in both departments.  On those 10 additional possessions, that team attempts 8 additional shots.  So let's say that translates to 85 attempts for Team A and 77 attempts for Team B.

Team A - 85 ATT
Team B - 77 ATT

If both teams shoot the same eFG% (2012 league average 48.6%):

Team A - 85 ATT * 48.6% * 2 PTS = 82 points + free throws
Team B - 77 ATT * 48.6% * 2 PTS = 75 points + free throws

If Team B outshoots Team A by 3.0%:

Team A - 85 ATT * 47.1% * 2 PTS = 80 points + free throws
Team B - 77 ATT * 50.1% * 2 PTS = 77 points + free throws

If Team B outshoots Team A by 5.0%:

Team A - 85 ATT * 46.1% * 2 PTS = 78 points + free throws
Team B - 77 ATT * 51.1% * 2 PTS = 78 points + free throws

So even if Team A finishes the game with pretty significant advantages in rebounds and turnovers... Team B can overtake a 7 point deficit simply by shooting 5% better than Team A.  This should illustrate the power of effective field goal percentage. 

 In a game with an equal number of shot attempts for both teams +1 eFG% is worth about 2.6 points.  In a game where one team attempts 8 fewer shot attempts +1 eFG% is worth about 1.4 points.

After doing countless studies like this dealing with the relationship between the four factors and MOV and W%, I determined that the most accurate way to project an NBA game is to determine two things:  1) which team will get more shot attempts and how many and 2) which team will shoot better and by how much.  I reworked my models to reflect these findings.  And quite frankly, I can't wait to get my money back from my bookie this season.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 485
Posted: #147
so much insight, you are a true vet.

much appreciated
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 678
Posted: #148
Just did a 2 team teaser. Filled one with Ala/LSU under 47.  What is your best close?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6686
Posted: #149
Quote Originally Posted by davopnz:

ryan mathews will end this game with better stats than charles



 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #150
Good call Davopz.  Kansas City continues to find every way possible to lose.  They ran more plays, had more time of possession and converted more first downs.. yet they lost by 18.  It turned out that this game held true to the expected 2-1 advantage for San Diego in yards per point.
All Forums | Website Promotions
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.