Final Nov 26
CHS 71 18.0 o136.0
DREX 83 -18.0 u136.0
Final Nov 26
SIE 64 6.0 o129.5
JAC 75 -6.0 u129.5
Final Nov 26
DUQ 67 -10.0 o140.0
ODU 54 10.0 u140.0
Final Nov 26
TLSA 63 -10.0 o141.0
DETU 44 10.0 u141.0
Final Nov 26
EKY 77 4.0 o149.5
SIU 72 -4.0 u149.5
Final Nov 26
SELA 69 3.0 o139.0
WEBB 73 -3.0 u139.0
Final Nov 26
M-OH 75 -3.5 o152.5
MER 72 3.5 u152.5
Final Nov 26
HAMP 73 11.0 o134.0
HP 76 -11.0 u134.0
Final Nov 26
FOR 64 11.0 o141.0
SF 85 -11.0 u141.0
Final Nov 26
SDSU 71 4.5 o140.5
CREI 53 -4.5 u140.5
Final Nov 26
PEAY 62 1.5 o145.5
GSU 50 -1.5 u145.5
Final Nov 26
LT 65 -8.0 o135.0
RICH 62 8.0 u135.0
Final Nov 26
COOK 79 3.5 o145.0
UND 67 -3.5 u145.0
Final Nov 26
CONN 72 -14.5 o144.0
COLO 73 14.5 u144.0
Final Nov 26
PSU 67 1.5 o150.5
CLEM 75 -1.5 u150.5
Final Nov 26
DEN 54 2.5 o150.0
UTECH 68 -2.5 u150.0
Final Nov 26
BRY 97 -9.0 o158.5
TNST 85 9.0 u158.5
Final Nov 26
UVU 77 -15.0 o139.5
UWG 74 15.0 u139.5
Final Nov 26
ORE 80 3.5 o147.0
TAM 70 -3.5 u147.0
Final Nov 26
MURR 79 -5.5 o152.5
UTA 66 5.5 u152.5
Final Nov 26
SDST 75 -2.5 o143.0
MOSU 55 2.5 u143.0
Final Nov 26
FLATC 57 -0.0 o0.0
BALL 94 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
MEM 71 2.5 o149.0
MSU 63 -2.5 u149.0
Final Nov 26
NJIT 53 12.0 o132.5
CLEVST 56 -12.0 u132.5
Final Nov 26
WYO 64 2.0 o143.0
TULN 63 -2.0 u143.0
Final Nov 26
MID 60 -0.0 o0.0
BELL 101 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
WKU 68 24.0 o165.5
UK 87 -24.0 u165.5
Final Nov 26
RAD 69 7.0 o147.0
PFW 56 -7.0 u147.0
Final Nov 26
VMI 67 4.0 o144.5
L-MD 70 -4.0 u144.5
Final Nov 26
MAN 65 17.0 o128.5
UVA 74 -17.0 u128.5
Final Nov 26
COPP 54 29.5 o142.5
STJOE 83 -29.5 u142.5
Final Nov 26
WAG 41 14.5 o128.0
GTWN 66 -14.5 u128.0
Final Nov 26
STAND 85 -0.0 o0.0
CIT 100 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
GRC 78 1.0 o144.0
STAN 71 -1.0 u144.0
Final Nov 26
SPU 78 -7.5 o142.5
FDU 76 7.5 u142.5
Final Nov 26
LEH 78 -4.5 o142.0
SFPA 88 4.5 u142.0
Final Nov 26
WCU 57 20.5 o145.5
FSU 91 -20.5 u145.5
Final Nov 26
PStWB 43 -0.0 o0.0
DSU 111 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
SUNYM 52 -0.0 o0.0
ARMY 91 0.0 u0.0
Final OT Nov 26
NDSU 98 11.5 o154.0
SAM 103 -11.5 u154.0
Final Nov 26
BSU 61 -9.5 o144.0
BC 63 9.5 u144.0
Final Nov 26
SCUS 77 29.0 o169.0
IOWA 110 -29.0 u169.0
Final OT Nov 26
HOU 80 -4.0 o150.0
ALA 85 4.0 u150.0
Final Nov 26
NNMC 50 -0.0 o0.0
UNCO 92 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
TXLTH 45 -0.0 o0.0
AMCC 94 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
WIU 64 11.0 o133.0
USA 63 -11.0 u133.0
Final Nov 26
UTEP 70 -8.0 o131.5
LBSU 44 8.0 u131.5
Final Nov 26
ISU 89 -9.5 o143.0
DAY 84 9.5 u143.0
Final Nov 26
LMU 77 2.5 o153.5
BEL 63 -2.5 u153.5
Final Nov 26
NAU 68 -3.0 o136.5
EMU 72 3.0 u136.5
Final Nov 26
MVSU 48 42.5 o141.0
UTAH 94 -42.5 u141.0
Final Nov 26
DUKE 72 -4.0 o148.5
KU 75 4.0 u148.5
Final Nov 26
CSF 72 6.5 o136.0
PEPP 63 -6.5 u136.0
Final Nov 26
ACU 59 5.5 o141.5
MTST 85 -5.5 u141.5
Final Nov 26
SMU 79 -10.5 o153.0
CALBA 77 10.5 u153.0
Final Nov 26
SUU 43 23.5 o142.5
UCLA 88 -23.5 u142.5
Final Nov 26
EWU 51 11.0 o150.5
UCSB 67 -11.0 u150.5
Final Nov 26
GRAM 79 6.0 o151.5
CP 82 -6.0 u151.5
Final OT Nov 26
RUTG 85 -1.0 o146.0
ND 84 1.0 u146.0
Final Nov 26
AUB 85 -4.0 o167.5
UNC 72 4.0 u167.5
Final Nov 26
SJSU 69 4.5 o135.5
UNCG 64 -4.5 u135.5
Final Nov 26
FUR 61 -1.5 o142.0
SEA 56 1.5 u142.0
Final Nov 27
FRES 73 11.5 o161.0
WSU 84 -11.5 u161.0
Final Nov 27
HAWPA 63
HAW 67
Tennessee 0th Southeastern18-9
Missouri 0th Southeastern16-10

Tennessee @ Missouri preview

Mizzou Arena

Last Meeting ( Jan 7, 2020 ) Tennessee 69, Missouri 59

The No. 12 Missouri Tigers will try to carry their surprising non-conference success into Southeastern Conference play when they host No. 7 Tennessee on Wednesday night.

The Tigers (6-0) are enjoying their first national ranking since 2014. Earlier this season they scored upsets over Oregon on a neutral site and against Illinois at home.

Missouri was picked 10th in the SEC preseason poll while Tennessee (6-0) was deemed the league favorite. This game at Mizzou Arena will be the conference opener for both schools.

The Vols are coming off of an 80-60 victory over South Carolina Upstate last Wednesday. They were forced into a slower offensive pace after scoring 205 points in their two previous victories over Tennessee Tech and St. Joseph's.

"I thought Upstate had a terrific game plan," Vols coach Rick Barnes said. "They were going to shorten the game. This was probably as good of a game as we could have to get ready going into conference play because it's different from what we have played. It shows that as much as we wanted to play at a faster pace ... the other team had something to do with that."

Missouri needed Jeremiah Tilmon's three-point play with one second left to rally past Bradley 54-53 last Tuesday. The Braves kept the Tigers from pushing the tempo and they clogged Missouri's half-court offense.

"That was a tough game, we had a 10-day layoff," Tigers guard Xavier Pinson said. "But I feel like for us to be tested like that, while still trying to get our legs back under us, trying to get back in the flow of our normal pace. I feel like they prepared us really well to go right to conference games."

Tennessee entered the week allowing just 52.7 points per game, which tied for first in NCAA Division I scoring defense. The Vols ranked fifth with a positive scoring margin of 28 points per game.

They are catching Missouri coming off its worst offensive performance of the season. Pinson hit 3-of-7 shots from 3-point range, but the rest of the team went 0-for-14.

Overall, the Tigers are converting just 28.4 percent of their three-pointers.

"I think we're a better 3-point shooting team than what we've shown, but I think you can't settle for them," Missouri coach Cuonzo Martin said. "It looks easy, but you got to do the tough stuff, you got to drive the ball, get in there and get good 3s. Those things you have to consistently do, and you have to understand who you are -- if you're a spot shooter, be that."

Missouri has a guard-driven offense led by Pinson (14.3 points per game), Mark Smith (13.8) and Dru Smith (13.2).

The Vols have four players averaging double-figure point totals this season: Victory Bailey Jr. (13.2), John Fulkerson (11.8), Jaden Springer (11.5) and Josiah-Jordan James (10.0).

Yves Pons is averaging 7.5 points and 6.0 rebounds per game. Barnes believes he can improve on both categories in SEC play.

"Consistency is the big word for all of our team," Barnes said. "I think Yves has to be more consistent at rebounding. I think he has to get to the foul line more. I do not care if he makes a 3-point shot all year. I know that when he takes his shot that he works on, he is a high-percentage 3-point shooter. But the fact is, he has not rebounded the ball the way he is capable of night-in and night-out. I think that he should average double-digit rebounds."

--Field Level Media

Pages Related to This Topic