Final Nov 26
CHS 71 18.0 o136.0
DREX 83 -18.0 u136.0
Final Nov 26
SIE 64 6.0 o129.5
JAC 75 -6.0 u129.5
Final Nov 26
DUQ 67 -10.0 o140.0
ODU 54 10.0 u140.0
Final Nov 26
TLSA 63 -10.0 o141.0
DETU 44 10.0 u141.0
Final Nov 26
EKY 77 4.0 o149.5
SIU 72 -4.0 u149.5
Final Nov 26
SELA 69 3.0 o139.0
WEBB 73 -3.0 u139.0
Final Nov 26
HAMP 73 11.0 o134.0
HP 76 -11.0 u134.0
Final Nov 26
M-OH 75 -3.5 o152.5
MER 72 3.5 u152.5
Final Nov 26
FOR 64 11.0 o141.0
SF 85 -11.0 u141.0
Final Nov 26
SDSU 71 4.5 o140.5
CREI 53 -4.5 u140.5
Final Nov 26
PEAY 62 1.5 o145.5
GSU 50 -1.5 u145.5
Final Nov 26
LT 65 -8.0 o135.0
RICH 62 8.0 u135.0
Final Nov 26
COOK 79 3.5 o145.0
UND 67 -3.5 u145.0
Final Nov 26
CONN 72 -14.5 o144.0
COLO 73 14.5 u144.0
Final Nov 26
DEN 54 2.5 o150.0
UTECH 68 -2.5 u150.0
Final Nov 26
PSU 67 1.5 o150.5
CLEM 75 -1.5 u150.5
Final Nov 26
BRY 97 -9.0 o158.5
TNST 85 9.0 u158.5
Final Nov 26
UVU 77 -15.0 o139.5
UWG 74 15.0 u139.5
Final Nov 26
ORE 80 3.5 o147.0
TAM 70 -3.5 u147.0
Final Nov 26
MURR 79 -5.5 o152.5
UTA 66 5.5 u152.5
Final Nov 26
SDST 75 -2.5 o143.0
MOSU 55 2.5 u143.0
Final Nov 26
FLATC 57 -0.0 o0.0
BALL 94 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
MEM 71 2.5 o149.0
MSU 63 -2.5 u149.0
Final Nov 26
NJIT 53 12.0 o132.5
CLEVST 56 -12.0 u132.5
Final Nov 26
WYO 64 2.0 o143.0
TULN 63 -2.0 u143.0
Final Nov 26
WKU 68 24.0 o165.5
UK 87 -24.0 u165.5
Final Nov 26
MID 60 -0.0 o0.0
BELL 101 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
RAD 69 7.0 o147.0
PFW 56 -7.0 u147.0
Final Nov 26
MAN 65 17.0 o128.5
UVA 74 -17.0 u128.5
Final Nov 26
VMI 67 4.0 o144.5
L-MD 70 -4.0 u144.5
Final Nov 26
WAG 41 14.5 o128.0
GTWN 66 -14.5 u128.0
Final Nov 26
STAND 85 -0.0 o0.0
CIT 100 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
WCU 57 20.5 o145.5
FSU 91 -20.5 u145.5
Final Nov 26
PStWB 43 -0.0 o0.0
DSU 111 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
COPP 54 29.5 o142.5
STJOE 83 -29.5 u142.5
Final Nov 26
LEH 78 -4.5 o142.0
SFPA 88 4.5 u142.0
Final Nov 26
SUNYM 52 -0.0 o0.0
ARMY 91 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
GRC 78 1.0 o144.0
STAN 71 -1.0 u144.0
Final Nov 26
SPU 78 -7.5 o142.5
FDU 76 7.5 u142.5
Final OT Nov 26
NDSU 98 11.5 o154.0
SAM 103 -11.5 u154.0
Final Nov 26
BSU 61 -9.5 o144.0
BC 63 9.5 u144.0
Final Nov 26
NNMC 50 -0.0 o0.0
UNCO 92 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 26
SCUS 77 29.0 o169.0
IOWA 110 -29.0 u169.0
Final Nov 26
WIU 64 11.0 o133.0
USA 63 -11.0 u133.0
Final Nov 26
TXLTH 45 -0.0 o0.0
AMCC 94 0.0 u0.0
Final OT Nov 26
HOU 80 -4.0 o150.0
ALA 85 4.0 u150.0
Final Nov 26
UTEP 70 -8.0 o131.5
LBSU 44 8.0 u131.5
Final Nov 26
ISU 89 -9.5 o143.0
DAY 84 9.5 u143.0
Final Nov 26
LMU 77 2.5 o153.5
BEL 63 -2.5 u153.5
Final Nov 26
MVSU 48 42.5 o141.0
UTAH 94 -42.5 u141.0
Final Nov 26
NAU 68 -3.0 o136.5
EMU 72 3.0 u136.5
Final Nov 26
DUKE 72 -4.0 o148.5
KU 75 4.0 u148.5
Final Nov 26
ACU 59 5.5 o141.5
MTST 85 -5.5 u141.5
Final Nov 26
CSF 72 6.5 o136.0
PEPP 63 -6.5 u136.0
Final Nov 26
SMU 79 -10.5 o153.0
CALBA 77 10.5 u153.0
Final Nov 26
SUU 43 23.5 o142.5
UCLA 88 -23.5 u142.5
Final Nov 26
EWU 51 11.0 o150.5
UCSB 67 -11.0 u150.5
Final Nov 26
GRAM 79 6.0 o151.5
CP 82 -6.0 u151.5
Final OT Nov 26
RUTG 85 -1.0 o146.0
ND 84 1.0 u146.0
Final Nov 26
AUB 85 -4.0 o167.5
UNC 72 4.0 u167.5
Final Nov 26
SJSU 69 4.5 o135.5
UNCG 64 -4.5 u135.5
Final Nov 26
FUR 61 -1.5 o142.0
SEA 56 1.5 u142.0
Final Nov 27
HAWPA 63
HAW 67
Final Nov 27
FRES 73 11.5 o161.0
WSU 84 -11.5 u161.0
Rutgers 0th Big Ten16-12
Ohio St. 0th Big Ten21-10

Rutgers @ Ohio St. preview

Value City Arena

Last Meeting ( Feb 12, 2020 ) Rutgers 66, Ohio St. 72

Rutgers looks to extend its best Big Ten start when the No. 11 Scarlet Knights oppose No. 23 Ohio State on Wednesday in Columbus, Ohio.

After defeating then-No. 13 Illinois 91-88 on Sunday, Rutgers (6-0, 2-0 Big Ten) appears to be one of the top teams in what many consider the best conference.

Not that Scarlet Knights coach Steve Pikiell is ready to listen to that sort of talk.

"We don't spend a lot of time, quite honestly, on that stuff," he said. "We know we've got four ranked teams in our next five games, I think. In our league, you're always playing ranked teams. That's the league we're in.

"We don't spent lot of time talking about expectation. We're talking about winning the next game. It was definitely a 40-minute game and to put up 91 points on board for us is a good sign for us moving forward, but we turn our attention quickly to a really good Ohio State team."

The Buckeyes (6-1, 0-1) responded to a 67-60 loss at Purdue in the Big Ten opener on Dec. 16 to defeat UCLA 77-70 on Saturday at Cleveland.

Ohio State regained the services of leading rebounder E.J. Liddell vs. the Bruins after he missed two games because of mononucleosis. He had nine points and three rebounds in 19 minutes against the Bruins before fouling out.

Ohio State coach Chris Holtmann is anxious to get Liddell back to full strength, starting against Rutgers.

"When you lose a player of his caliber, it affects you," Holtmann said.

Fortunately for the Buckeyes, freshmen Zed Key and Eugene Brown III picked up the slack after Liddell fouled out and made their first major contributions to the team this season.

With the score tied at 63, Key blocked a shot before Brown made 3-pointers on consecutive possessions to give the Buckeyes a lead they would not relinquish.

"Our two freshmen were outstanding," Holtmann said. "What it says about those guys is they just stayed ready. Both of them stayed ready."

Rutgers will rely heavily on Ron Harper Jr., who had 28 points and nine rebounds against Illinois. He has scored 20-plus points in four games and reached at least 15 points in every game this season.

However, what impressed Pikiell more than the individual play was the team effort that led to a 35-34 rebounding edge over Illinois. He knows that stat is one that can lead to success in the physical Big Ten.

"The guys on my staff did a good job of preparing the guys," he said. "We went head to head with them on the backboard. We pride ourselves on a being a good rebounding team, too. I was excited, we got 15 offensive rebounds."

The game against the Buckeyes may come down to a battle of the boards, and Holtmann, despite being pleased with most aspects of the win over UCLA, voiced some concern.

"I thought it was our best performance of the year," he said. "We played with more poise and purpose at both ends. We certainly weren't perfect. We gave up 18 offensive rebounds. That's far from perfect."

--Field Level Media

Pages Related to This Topic