Final Nov 24
PORT 67 11.5 o147.5
PRIN 94 -11.5 u147.5
Final Nov 24
SJU 63 -6.0 o151.5
UGA 66 6.0 u151.5
Final Nov 24
HAMP 69 22.5 o139.5
BSU 83 -22.5 u139.5
Final Nov 24
HC 55 5.0 o134.5
ME 80 -5.0 u134.5
Final Nov 24
LAM 59 2.0 o150.5
NEOM 65 -2.0 u150.5
Final Nov 24
COFC 53 3.5 o156.0
URI 91 -3.5 u156.0
Final Nov 24
HOW 62 -3.5 o134.5
BU 69 3.5 u134.5
Final Nov 24
WOF 74 -5.5 o150.5
PRST 79 5.5 u150.5
Final Nov 24
NE 60 -6.0 o131.5
CSB 68 6.0 u131.5
Final Nov 24
ALBY 77 -1.0 o135.5
AMER 81 1.0 u135.5
Final Nov 24
MIA 70 3.0 o146.0
VCU 77 -3.0 u146.0
Final Nov 24
RUTG 77 -11.5 o157.5
KENN 79 11.5 u157.5
Final Nov 24
Rose 45 -0.0 o0.0
LAF 91 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 24
USF 73 -3.0 o154.0
WRST 72 3.0 u154.0
Final Nov 24
VILL 75 5.0 o137.5
MD 76 -5.0 u137.5
Final Nov 24
UVM 66 -8.5 o135.5
FAIR 67 8.5 u135.5
Final Nov 24
BING 56 5.5 o134.5
CCSU 64 -5.5 u134.5
Final Nov 24
CWM 76 4.5 o147.0
APP 79 -4.5 u147.0
Final Nov 24
SDST 71 -3.0 o147.0
DUQ 60 3.0 u147.0
Final 0OT Nov 24
UNCA 83 -7.5 o144.5
CARK 92 7.5 u144.5
Final Nov 24
EIU 53 6.5 o141.5
VALP 81 -6.5 u141.5
Final Nov 24
BRY 70 7.5 o149.5
SBON 85 -7.5 u149.5
Final Nov 24
STT 65 3.0 o152.5
MILW 69 -3.0 u152.5
Final Nov 24
ALST 78 7.5 o149.0
AKR 97 -7.5 u149.0
Final Nov 24
NORAL 58 -7.0 o144.0
NWST 71 7.0 u144.0
Final Nov 24
FIU 59 4.5 o135.0
FGCU 60 -4.5 u135.0
Final OT Nov 24
LSU 109 -1.0 o147.0
UCF 102 1.0 u147.0
Final Nov 24
OKST 78 6.0 o145.0
NEV 90 -6.0 u145.0
Final Nov 24
KC 88 -0.0 o0.0
55 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 24
FSU 92 -5.5 o151.0
MASS 59 5.5 u151.0
Final Nov 24
TOWS 64 -10.0 o143.5
MORG 60 10.0 u143.5
Final Nov 24
UTECH 79 8.5 o155.5
CSN 89 -8.5 u155.5
Final Nov 24
MEHST 48 9.0 o127.0
AFA 82 -9.0 u127.0
Final Nov 24
CAMP 53 4.0 o145.5
EVAN 66 -4.0 u145.5
Final Nov 24
CSUS 77 17.0 o139.5
CAL 83 -17.0 u139.5
Final Nov 24
QNC 67 8.5 o153.0
ETSU 82 -8.5 u153.0
Final Nov 24
ARPB 63 35.5 o158.0
MIZZ 112 -35.5 u158.0
Final Nov 24
IDHO 61 4.0 o146.5
USD 68 -4.0 u146.5
Final Nov 24
JKST 53 16.0 o145.5
LIP 77 -16.0 u145.5
Final Nov 24
MOSU 71 8.5 o143.0
HP 61 -8.5 u143.0
Final Nov 24
ALCN 52 17.0 o137.0
UCRV 69 -17.0 u137.0
Final Nov 24
LONG 69 8.0 o142.0
MCNS 84 -8.0 u142.0
Final Nov 24
MTU 69 5.5 o145.0
BRAD 80 -5.5 u145.0
Final Nov 24
PITT 75 -2.5 o148.0
WIS 81 2.5 u148.0
Final Nov 24
FAU 61 -2.5 o137.0
HALL 63 2.5 u137.0
Final Nov 24
YALE 94 -8.5 o148.0
DEL 100 8.5 u148.0
Final Nov 24
GRAM 69 22.5 o139.0
USC 80 -22.5 u139.0
Final Nov 24
DEN 73 10.5 o148.5
MONT 83 -10.5 u148.5
Final Nov 24
ODU 52 11.5 o143.5
BC 82 -11.5 u143.5
Final Nov 24
TXSO 68 25.0 o157.0
UNM 99 -25.0 u157.0
Final Nov 24
OHIO 65 -3.0 o146.5
TXST 74 3.0 u146.5
Final Nov 24
LIB 67 3.5 o132.5
KSU 65 -3.5 u132.5
Final Nov 24
USM 59 7.5 o151.5
MTST 79 -7.5 u151.5
Final Nov 24
DRKE 81 4.0 o142.5
VAN 70 -4.0 u142.5
Michigan 0th Big Ten23-5
Wisconsin 0th Big Ten18-13

Michigan @ Wisconsin preview

Kohl Center

Last Meeting ( Jan 12, 2021 ) Wisconsin 54, Michigan 77

A school of thought floating around some Big Ten Conference fan bases is that No. 3 Michigan's COVID-19 pause lasted a little longer than it needed to, that the Wolverines extended it an extra week to duck a Thursday night matchup with No. 6 Illinois.

However, that theory, and Michigan's perch atop the conference, might not stand the test of time -- in this case, the next three games.

The Wolverines travel to No. 21 Wisconsin on Sunday, return home to face No. 25 Rutgers on Wednesday, then visit No. 4 Ohio State on Feb. 21.

Second-year coach Juwan Howard confirmed that Michigan's first practice after a mandatory 14-day break looked like the workout of a team that hadn't touched a ball in two weeks.

"There were some turnovers being made," he said. "There was some excessive fouling. There were some wobbly legs."

Forward Isaiah Livers compared that practice to the start of a new season. One big difference in the start of an actual season and a restart to a pandemic season is that the Wolverines (13-1, 8-1 Big Ten) don't get to dine on a nonconference cupcake before diving into the entrees.

Instead, they might have to bite off more than a team that's been off for three weeks can be expected to chew. What's more, the Badgers (15-6, 9-5) are likely to be motivated after absorbing a 77-54 beatdown at Michigan on Jan. 12 that featured a mind-boggling 43-6 run spanning the halves.

Known for strong defense and poise, Wisconsin exhibited neither that night, trailing by 40 points at one stage in the second half. It required a game-ending 25-8 run just to make the final score appear that flattering.

Not that coach Greg Gard is focused on revenge games. After watching the Badgers muddle through a 61-48 win at Nebraska on Wednesday, when they made just 32.3 percent of their shots and won largely because the Cornhuskers have lost 25 straight conference regular-season games, he's more interested in getting efficient play.

So are his players.

"Getting out of this thing with a win (while) not playing to our full potential is definitely a good thing," Wisconsin guard Trevor Anderson said.

Freshman Jonathan Davis came off the bench to score a team-high 10 points for Wisconsin. D'Mitrik Trice, one of three Badgers to add nine points against the Cornhuskers, continues to lead the team in scoring at 13.5 points per game while averaging nearly 2 1/2 assists for every turnover.

The Wolverines, meanwhile, last played on Jan. 22, when they dismantled host Purdue 70-53 behind a strong defensive effort that held the Boilermakers to 30.8 percent field-goal shooting. Livers was the star of that game, putting up 22 points and 10 rebounds.

Freshman center Hunter Dickinson is the team's top scorer at 15.1 points per game, and he is converting 68.8 percent of his field-goal tries. Livers is right behind him at 14.6 ppg, and Franz Wagner adds 12 ppg. As a team, Michigan is shooting 50.9 percent from the field and 76.8 percent from the foul line.

Howard isn't promising a crisp performance Sunday.

"I don't know what it's going to look like," he said, "but from start to finish, we're going to give our best effort."

--Field Level Media

Pages Related to This Topic