AMER -0.0 o0.0
0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 23
UNC 87 -15.5 o153.0
HAW 69 15.5 u153.0
Final Nov 23
UGA 69 5.5 o150.5
MARQ 80 -5.5 u150.5
Final Nov 23
LAS 92 -11.0 o146.5
STET 77 11.0 u146.5
Final OT Nov 23
CSB 73 1.5 o142.5
FIU 76 -1.5 u142.5
Final Nov 23
MRSH 45 20.0 o150.0
PUR 80 -20.0 u150.0
Final Nov 23
BU 75 2.0 o144.5
UMBC 71 -2.0 u144.5
Final Nov 23
DEL 71 6.5 o139.5
UVM 75 -6.5 u139.5
Final Nov 23
PRE 71 -2.0 o139.0
MONM 61 2.0 u139.0
Final Nov 23
SFPA 65 21.0 o144.5
GTWN 82 -21.0 u144.5
Final Nov 23
UWG 54 14.5 o154.0
GASO 64 -14.5 u154.0
Final Nov 23
LIU 79 14.0 o138.0
CHAR 76 -14.0 u138.0
Final Nov 23
KTYST 59 -0.0 o0.0
NKU 85 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 23
KC 65 -2.0 o143.0
ALBY 67 2.0 u143.0
Final Nov 23
PRST 65 2.5 o152.5
STT 91 -2.5 u152.5
Final Nov 23
QUIN 70 5.5 o153.0
UMASS 80 -5.5 u153.0
Final Nov 23
BRWN 83 -8.5 o143.0
CAN 76 8.5 u143.0
Final Nov 23
UIC 55 2.0 o149.5
ECU 72 -2.0 u149.5
Final Nov 23
NE 59 2.0 o135.0
FGCU 55 -2.0 u135.0
Final Nov 23
FUR 67 -9.0 o147.5
CHSO 46 9.0 u147.5
Final Nov 23
UNH 49 12.5 o138.5
MRST 54 -12.5 u138.5
Final Nov 23
FERR 55
GMU 100
Final Nov 23
SCST 72 -4.5 o142.5
INDPU 62 4.5 u142.5
Final Nov 23
CIN 81 -7.0 o149.5
GT 58 7.0 u149.5
Final Nov 23
FAIR 66 10.5 o139.0
YALE 91 -10.5 u139.0
Final Nov 23
BGSU 68 -4.5 o146.5
BELL 80 4.5 u146.5
Final Nov 23
UAB 83 -7.0 o145.0
ILST 84 7.0 u145.0
Final Nov 23
JMU 71 -3.0 o140.0
JVST 65 3.0 u140.0
Final Nov 23
AMER 73 -0.0 o0.0
56 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 23
UMES 40 36.0 o154.0
ILL 87 -36.0 u154.0
Final Nov 23
NEOM 84 11.5 o149.0
AKR 92 -11.5 u149.0
Final Nov 23
DETU 57 24.0 o141.0
WAKE 67 -24.0 u141.0
Final Nov 23
DSU 66 8.0 o139.5
MSM 76 -8.0 u139.5
Final Nov 23
WOF 74 3.5 o150.5
MILW 76 -3.5 u150.5
Final Nov 23
SPRI 46 -0.0 o0.0
WAG 81 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 23
LEM 61 11.5 o151.5
AMCC 82 -11.5 u151.5
Final Nov 23
CCU 70 -3.0 o135.0
AAMU 77 3.0 u135.0
Final Nov 23
FRES 72 3.5 o140.5
LBSU 69 -3.5 u140.5
Final Nov 23
IDHO 67 2.5 o145.5
SUU 82 -2.5 u145.5
Final Nov 23
MASS 80 -2.0 o148.0
TEM 87 2.0 u148.0
Final Nov 23
NORAL 74 -9.5 o146.0
ULM 62 9.5 u146.0
Final Nov 23
NIU 52 17.5 o143.0
DEP 98 -17.5 u143.0
Final Nov 23
ULL 74 6.5 o152.0
GW 83 -6.5 u152.0
Final Nov 23
UCSD 80 1.0 o155.0
TOL 45 -1.0 u155.0
Final Nov 23
TLSA 53 9.5 o146.5
L-IL 89 -9.5 u146.5
Final Nov 23
SCUS 74 3.0 o155.5
QNC 98 -3.0 u155.5
Final Nov 23
ALST 77 -2.0 o149.0
LAM 75 2.0 u149.0
Final Nov 23
NMSU 65 11.5 o141.0
UNLV 72 -11.5 u141.0
Final Nov 23
RID 57 4.5 o142.0
BUCK 53 -4.5 u142.0
Final Nov 23
KENT 68 -2.5 o135.0
CLEVST 52 2.5 u135.0
Final Nov 23
STAMB 49 -0.0 o0.0
SIUE 83 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 23
YSU 57 3.0 o128.5
SFA 64 -3.0 u128.5
Final Nov 23
STON 63 11.0 o153.0
CLMB 82 -11.0 u153.0
Final Nov 23
PV 98 19.5 o160.0
UNCO 114 -19.5 u160.0
Final Nov 23
CP 66 20.5 o148.0
SMC 80 -20.5 u148.0
Final Nov 23
EWU 68 7.0 o151.5
CALBA 79 -7.0 u151.5
Final Nov 23
MVSU 43 45.0 o144.0
BYU 87 -45.0 u144.0
Final Nov 23
STAN 71 1.0 o147.5
SCU 69 -1.0 u147.5
Texas A&M 0th Southeastern27-13
Wisconsin 0th Big Ten25-8

Texas A&M @ Wisconsin preview

Michelob Ultra Arena

Although Wisconsin and Texas A&M have met just once before, there will be some familiarity when the Badgers face the Aggies in Monday's opening round of the Maui Invitational, played this season in Las Vegas instead of Hawaii.

Texas A&M (4-0) is coached by Buzz Williams, who split six games with in-state rival Wisconsin when he was the coach at Marquette. The Badgers also defeated Williams-coached Virginia Tech, 84-74, in the 2017 NCAA Tournament.

"In my tenure here, we have not played against a team that has the same foundation that Wisconsin does," Williams said. "Obviously, because of my path, I'm very familiar with them."

"They're incredibly physical," he added. "They have great poise late in the clock. It will be the slowest game, I anticipate, we have played since I've been employed here. They never beat themselves."

Wisconsin (2-1) is coming off a rare home loss -- 63-58 to Providence last Monday -- that snapped the Badgers' streak of 23 consecutive nonconference wins at the Kohl Center in Madison. With Johnny Davis (15.0 points per game) out with a bruised heel, Wisconsin shot just 32.8 percent. Davis is expected to be ready for Texas A&M.

Fifth-year senior guard Brad Davison had a season-high 25 points against Providence. Steven Crowl had 29 points and 15 rebounds in the first two-games, but the 7-footer had just four points on 1-of-10 shooting with four rebounds against All-Big East center Nate Watson.

Wisconsin has held its first three opponents to 51.7 points per game and a 35.1 field-goal percentage.

"I've always liked the competitiveness and the grit of this group, now we've got to clean up and continue to improve some of those other areas," Wisconsin coach Greg Gard said. "And, obviously be a little cleaner offensively."

Texas A&M is coming off a 73-39 victory over Houston Baptist on Wednesday. Tyrece Radford and Quenton Jackson each had 13 points for the Aggies, who opened the second half with a 22-0 run. Aaron Cash came off the bench for 12 points and a team-high 10 rebounds.

The Aggies outrebounded Houston Baptist 43-26 and had a 38-14 advantage on points in the paint.

The Aggies feature a balanced attack with Henry Coleman III (12.5 points per game), Radford (11.3), Marcus Williams (10.8) and Jackson (10.8) each averaging in double figures. Texas A&M has limited opponents to just 36.7 percent shooting.

The only other meeting between Wisconsin and Texas A&M was in 1984, when the Badgers won 71-69 in Madison.

--Field Level Media

Pages Related to This Topic