Duron Carter cut.... teams never learn that head cases like him and Dez Bryant bring the team down. I won't miss him and I'm sure a lot of his teammates are relieved.
Hope he saved his money.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Indigo lines
Bombers -5 Redblacks 55
Argos +1 Lions 52'
Eskimos -13 Alouettes 51
Riders +6' Stamps 50
Duron Carter cut.... teams never learn that head cases like him and Dez Bryant bring the team down. I won't miss him and I'm sure a lot of his teammates are relieved.
There's hope for the Alouettes....they got thrashed in yards at Ottawa, but Johnny M showed some good signs. He had his receivers drop a few, a couple of which would have produced at least 30 yard completions.
Edmonton's rush defense is nothing to write home about....Montreal could outrush the Eskimos this week and usually there is a high correlation between winning the rushing game and covering.
Hoping the Lions are getting some points versus the Argos.
Redblacks have been a Jeckyl and Hyde team...they rarely cover at home and are very good on the road. They are a very similar team to the Tiger Cats and I would think the line would be similar to what it was versus for the Bombers versus Hamilton.
0
There's hope for the Alouettes....they got thrashed in yards at Ottawa, but Johnny M showed some good signs. He had his receivers drop a few, a couple of which would have produced at least 30 yard completions.
Edmonton's rush defense is nothing to write home about....Montreal could outrush the Eskimos this week and usually there is a high correlation between winning the rushing game and covering.
Hoping the Lions are getting some points versus the Argos.
Redblacks have been a Jeckyl and Hyde team...they rarely cover at home and are very good on the road. They are a very similar team to the Tiger Cats and I would think the line would be similar to what it was versus for the Bombers versus Hamilton.
A team that had >2 turnovers last week and won, now a road dog (Redblacks) 9-4 ATS (+1.42), 5-8 ATS (-4.54).
A team that was outyarded by more than 200 yards and lost the game, now a road non-conference dog (Alouettes).
10-8 ATS (+1.83) and 2-12 straight up (-6.44) and 11-7 O/U (1.92).
A non-con away dog off an loss that allowed >500 yards their previous game (Alouettes) 13-6 ATS (+3.15) and 6-14 straight up and 10-10 O/U.
A non-conference team with a turnover margin differential disadvantage coming into the game, that is an away dog (Redblacks, Lions if away dog) 44-28 ATS (+1.66) 21-51 straight up (-6.49), 32-40 O/U (-0.93).
A non-conference home favorite off an away loss, that threw >1 intereceptions their previous game (Eskimos) 7-13 ATS (-2.92) 9-11 straight up (3.70), 11-9 O/U (0.90).
A Western Division home favorite that has the average yards per pass differential advantage, has a better overall record and is a home favorite (Eskimos) 39-41 ATS (1.71) and 45-36 O/U (+1.70).
A non- conference Western Division away team with a better winning percentage with a <500 record playing an Eastern Division team (Lions) 7-13 ATS (0.90) 6-15 O/U (-3.43)
0
A team that had >2 turnovers last week and won, now a road dog (Redblacks) 9-4 ATS (+1.42), 5-8 ATS (-4.54).
A team that was outyarded by more than 200 yards and lost the game, now a road non-conference dog (Alouettes).
10-8 ATS (+1.83) and 2-12 straight up (-6.44) and 11-7 O/U (1.92).
A non-con away dog off an loss that allowed >500 yards their previous game (Alouettes) 13-6 ATS (+3.15) and 6-14 straight up and 10-10 O/U.
A non-conference team with a turnover margin differential disadvantage coming into the game, that is an away dog (Redblacks, Lions if away dog) 44-28 ATS (+1.66) 21-51 straight up (-6.49), 32-40 O/U (-0.93).
A non-conference home favorite off an away loss, that threw >1 intereceptions their previous game (Eskimos) 7-13 ATS (-2.92) 9-11 straight up (3.70), 11-9 O/U (0.90).
A Western Division home favorite that has the average yards per pass differential advantage, has a better overall record and is a home favorite (Eskimos) 39-41 ATS (1.71) and 45-36 O/U (+1.70).
A non- conference Western Division away team with a better winning percentage with a <500 record playing an Eastern Division team (Lions) 7-13 ATS (0.90) 6-15 O/U (-3.43)
A non-divisional Western Division home favorite of >-7 points, week>3 playing a team with a <.33 winning percentage 27-23 ATS (+3.41) 45-5-1 straight up (+14.36) and 21-29 O/U (-2.27) Eskimos
0
A non-divisional Western Division home favorite of >-7 points, week>3 playing a team with a <.33 winning percentage 27-23 ATS (+3.41) 45-5-1 straight up (+14.36) and 21-29 O/U (-2.27) Eskimos
Ottawa falls into a 44-28 ATS angle detailed above.
2) Riders/Stamps UNDER 48'
Riders down 24-0 in the first quarter of first meeting in Sasquatch City with many turnovers. This one will be the defensive slugfest that many thought would happen in the first game. I expect both teams to emphasize ball security and conservatism.
If the Lions become away dogs, which they have in some books I will probably play them as well.
0
Season to date, 22-14-2.
Plays:
1) Ottawa +6
Ottawa falls into a 44-28 ATS angle detailed above.
2) Riders/Stamps UNDER 48'
Riders down 24-0 in the first quarter of first meeting in Sasquatch City with many turnovers. This one will be the defensive slugfest that many thought would happen in the first game. I expect both teams to emphasize ball security and conservatism.
If the Lions become away dogs, which they have in some books I will probably play them as well.
I have two queries which support the OTT selection. I won't post the actual queries, just the QR's (Query Results) so you can judge for yourself if the sample sizes, ATS margins, or winning percentages meet your betting criteria.
ATS: 162-118-7 (1.30, 57.9%)
ATS: 5-15-1 (-4.62, 25.0%) - fading WPG
I have five queries that pick CGY-SAS Over. None of them are statistically strong enough to warrant a bet individually, but collectively they'd be cautious about betting the Under.
Good luck everybody.
0
I have two queries which support the OTT selection. I won't post the actual queries, just the QR's (Query Results) so you can judge for yourself if the sample sizes, ATS margins, or winning percentages meet your betting criteria.
ATS: 162-118-7 (1.30, 57.9%)
ATS: 5-15-1 (-4.62, 25.0%) - fading WPG
I have five queries that pick CGY-SAS Over. None of them are statistically strong enough to warrant a bet individually, but collectively they'd be cautious about betting the Under.
BC looks likely to remain a favorite, so I will not be playing them.
One other play:
4) Edmonton/Montreal OVER 52
This will be the week Johnny and his mates get some production done against the bad Edmonton defense, I expect them to score >20. Riley will produce a ton as well as Montreal allowed >500 yards last week and allowed 50 points in another.
My other plays:
3) Saskatchewan/Calgary UNDER 48'
2) Ottawa +6'
1) Ottawa/Winnipeg OVER 53'
I like the fact that there have been plenty of UNDERs the past few weeks, time for a regression.
0
BC looks likely to remain a favorite, so I will not be playing them.
One other play:
4) Edmonton/Montreal OVER 52
This will be the week Johnny and his mates get some production done against the bad Edmonton defense, I expect them to score >20. Riley will produce a ton as well as Montreal allowed >500 yards last week and allowed 50 points in another.
My other plays:
3) Saskatchewan/Calgary UNDER 48'
2) Ottawa +6'
1) Ottawa/Winnipeg OVER 53'
I like the fact that there have been plenty of UNDERs the past few weeks, time for a regression.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.