Still no *Best Bets on the horizon yet, but if I do it will likely be during LIVE ACTION betting.
My method is to look for my pregame choice to be down a bit so I can get a better ML price and then *ONLY* if the boxscore metrics are appealing enough to suggest a comeback is probable.
*Best Bets so far: 64 - 23 (73.5%)
2
Still no *Best Bets on the horizon yet, but if I do it will likely be during LIVE ACTION betting.
My method is to look for my pregame choice to be down a bit so I can get a better ML price and then *ONLY* if the boxscore metrics are appealing enough to suggest a comeback is probable.
Still no *Best Bets on the horizon yet, but if I do it will likely be during LIVE ACTION betting. My method is to look for my pregame choice to be down a bit so I can get a better ML price and then *ONLY* if the boxscore metrics are appealing enough to suggest a comeback is probable. *Best Bets so far: 64 - 23 (73.5%)
marquette making it look easy
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Still no *Best Bets on the horizon yet, but if I do it will likely be during LIVE ACTION betting. My method is to look for my pregame choice to be down a bit so I can get a better ML price and then *ONLY* if the boxscore metrics are appealing enough to suggest a comeback is probable. *Best Bets so far: 64 - 23 (73.5%)
So the two cardiac kids who each nearly caused me a stroke on Thursday in separate games, Marquette and Xavier, meet today. Oh joy, oh rapture.
I give Marquette the edge here but will likely look for a cheap line or even +pts in the early going
I figured Marquette had the edge and I wanted them, but I sure didn't forsee hanging a huge beatdown on the Mouseketeers.
My Golden Eagles hopefuls were never behind in the score so I could not get the cheapie odds I hoped for (because I was expecting a close game) and eventually let it go as a "pass" Oh well. Nothing lost
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
So the two cardiac kids who each nearly caused me a stroke on Thursday in separate games, Marquette and Xavier, meet today. Oh joy, oh rapture.
I give Marquette the edge here but will likely look for a cheap line or even +pts in the early going
I figured Marquette had the edge and I wanted them, but I sure didn't forsee hanging a huge beatdown on the Mouseketeers.
My Golden Eagles hopefuls were never behind in the score so I could not get the cheapie odds I hoped for (because I was expecting a close game) and eventually let it go as a "pass" Oh well. Nothing lost
Keeping an eye on Toledo. Should get a good line once 2H starts but need to see if they start shooting the ball a little better. Currently sub 40% and only down by one. If their shooting improves and Flashes keep their shooting avg (43%), Toledo should pull it out down the stretch.
0
Keeping an eye on Toledo. Should get a good line once 2H starts but need to see if they start shooting the ball a little better. Currently sub 40% and only down by one. If their shooting improves and Flashes keep their shooting avg (43%), Toledo should pull it out down the stretch.
Keeping an eye on Toledo. Should get a good line once 2H starts but need to see if they start shooting the ball a little better. Currently sub 40% and only down by one. If their shooting improves and Flashes keep their shooting avg (43%), Toledo should pull it out down the stretch.
Taking Toledo. Kent St INCREASED their FG% to 51% but has lots of guys with fouls. Toledo has upped their shooting but no foul issues. I am hoping Kent will eventually regress to their mean and fouls will have an impact on their play. Got Toledo on the ML +190
0
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32:
Keeping an eye on Toledo. Should get a good line once 2H starts but need to see if they start shooting the ball a little better. Currently sub 40% and only down by one. If their shooting improves and Flashes keep their shooting avg (43%), Toledo should pull it out down the stretch.
Taking Toledo. Kent St INCREASED their FG% to 51% but has lots of guys with fouls. Toledo has upped their shooting but no foul issues. I am hoping Kent will eventually regress to their mean and fouls will have an impact on their play. Got Toledo on the ML +190
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32: Keeping an eye on Toledo. Should get a good line once 2H starts but need to see if they start shooting the ball a little better. Currently sub 40% and only down by one. If their shooting improves and Flashes keep their shooting avg (43%), Toledo should pull it out down the stretch. Taking Toledo. Kent St INCREASED their FG% to 51% but has lots of guys with fouls. Toledo has upped their shooting but no foul issues. I am hoping Kent will eventually regress to their mean and fouls will have an impact on their play. Got Toledo on the ML +190
Not looking good. At least I have bourbon.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32:
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32: Keeping an eye on Toledo. Should get a good line once 2H starts but need to see if they start shooting the ball a little better. Currently sub 40% and only down by one. If their shooting improves and Flashes keep their shooting avg (43%), Toledo should pull it out down the stretch. Taking Toledo. Kent St INCREASED their FG% to 51% but has lots of guys with fouls. Toledo has upped their shooting but no foul issues. I am hoping Kent will eventually regress to their mean and fouls will have an impact on their play. Got Toledo on the ML +190
FWIW, I have VCU as having the edge in todays, game as the better team - teetering between slightly better and marginally better. This does take into account that starting guard Kobe Ellis for Dayton has missed their last two games and remains OUT - though they did win both without him, including a decent 10 pt win over 13 - 7 Fordham yesterday, while VCU was defeating 13 - 7 St.Louis by 12
1
FWIW, I have VCU as having the edge in todays, game as the better team - teetering between slightly better and marginally better. This does take into account that starting guard Kobe Ellis for Dayton has missed their last two games and remains OUT - though they did win both without him, including a decent 10 pt win over 13 - 7 Fordham yesterday, while VCU was defeating 13 - 7 St.Louis by 12
I'm passing (pregame) as the spread and ML odds appear deadly accurate on this one, and will watch for a possible opportunity in game - potential being the better team is down but all the boxscore metrics suggest they have a great shot for a comeback
-----------------------
One of my key measures for in game bets (besides the game score, obviously) is HOW MANY TIMES did each team score.
I mean sometimes it might look like this:
TEAM A has scored 24 times but only 3 for ten from the arc (30% isn't horrible)
compared to the opp who is leading the game.....but....
TEAM B has only scored say, 16 times, but 6 for 7 on 3s and luckily got +7 more FTs to stake a small lead.
In a case like this (which happens frequently) TEAM A has demonstrated an ability to continue scoring, whereas TEAM B - who are now leading - is inconsistent but has been fortunate to hit an extraordinary high % on 3s and got the lucky benefit of plenty of extra calls sending them to the FT line.....*usually* a first half like THAT will not sustain itself and TEAM A will keep chugging along and narrow the gap and possibly take the lead, particularly if TEAM A's top players are NOT in foul trouble but 1 or 2 of TEAM B's are (or soon likely to be) in foul trouble.
MENS YTD: 90 - 43
1
Quote Originally Posted by UGACLP1995:
i was leaning VCU
I'm passing (pregame) as the spread and ML odds appear deadly accurate on this one, and will watch for a possible opportunity in game - potential being the better team is down but all the boxscore metrics suggest they have a great shot for a comeback
-----------------------
One of my key measures for in game bets (besides the game score, obviously) is HOW MANY TIMES did each team score.
I mean sometimes it might look like this:
TEAM A has scored 24 times but only 3 for ten from the arc (30% isn't horrible)
compared to the opp who is leading the game.....but....
TEAM B has only scored say, 16 times, but 6 for 7 on 3s and luckily got +7 more FTs to stake a small lead.
In a case like this (which happens frequently) TEAM A has demonstrated an ability to continue scoring, whereas TEAM B - who are now leading - is inconsistent but has been fortunate to hit an extraordinary high % on 3s and got the lucky benefit of plenty of extra calls sending them to the FT line.....*usually* a first half like THAT will not sustain itself and TEAM A will keep chugging along and narrow the gap and possibly take the lead, particularly if TEAM A's top players are NOT in foul trouble but 1 or 2 of TEAM B's are (or soon likely to be) in foul trouble.
I was making up stats to illustrate a point and may have made a typo or two but you likely get my overall point about consistency and one team gaining a lot of good fortune...
0
I was making up stats to illustrate a point and may have made a typo or two but you likely get my overall point about consistency and one team gaining a lot of good fortune...
I was making up stats to illustrate a point and may have made a typo or two but you likely get my overall point about consistency and one team gaining a lot of good fortune...
Great perspective.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
I was making up stats to illustrate a point and may have made a typo or two but you likely get my overall point about consistency and one team gaining a lot of good fortune...
I'll be passing completely on the IVY league game as I see no discernible edge to either team.
Princeton has the benefit of playing the final at home.
But Yale whupped them good twice, which includes the recent FEB 18 game @Princeton also, where YALE was playing without their #1 star and still won by 10 pts.
Mind you Princeton is bummed and wants revenge of course and this is the final.
OTOH, YALE's top player having missed 3 recent games did return for the last one is good to go once again!
PASS!
0
I'll be passing completely on the IVY league game as I see no discernible edge to either team.
Princeton has the benefit of playing the final at home.
But Yale whupped them good twice, which includes the recent FEB 18 game @Princeton also, where YALE was playing without their #1 star and still won by 10 pts.
Mind you Princeton is bummed and wants revenge of course and this is the final.
OTOH, YALE's top player having missed 3 recent games did return for the last one is good to go once again!
I have the Aggies/Tide game as close, but with a tiny edge to Bama.
Against the top teams in the conference, Aggies went 6 - 1; Bama 5 - 2
Bama does have some small variables in their favor, sure, but imo, not enough to believe they will easily cover -5.5 pts and too risky to take ML at -225 or whatever, because I just DO NOT see their odds of winning at 2.2 to 1 over the team that beat them just last week in their only game.
So PASSING on the pregame bets due to no obvious/significant edge.
BUT.......if Bama falls a little behind, and the boxscore metrics are solid, I may take them at some point in game......OR......if indications are this might be a one-off bad day for Bama I would seriously consider A&M in game and likely getting a good price - since Bama enters as the fav.
1
I have the Aggies/Tide game as close, but with a tiny edge to Bama.
Against the top teams in the conference, Aggies went 6 - 1; Bama 5 - 2
Bama does have some small variables in their favor, sure, but imo, not enough to believe they will easily cover -5.5 pts and too risky to take ML at -225 or whatever, because I just DO NOT see their odds of winning at 2.2 to 1 over the team that beat them just last week in their only game.
So PASSING on the pregame bets due to no obvious/significant edge.
BUT.......if Bama falls a little behind, and the boxscore metrics are solid, I may take them at some point in game......OR......if indications are this might be a one-off bad day for Bama I would seriously consider A&M in game and likely getting a good price - since Bama enters as the fav.
For me, there is NOTHING in the boxscore metrics of the Aggies/Tide game that suggest I can steal a small line on a team with a serious shot to win.......therefore, I am totally off that game
0
For me, there is NOTHING in the boxscore metrics of the Aggies/Tide game that suggest I can steal a small line on a team with a serious shot to win.......therefore, I am totally off that game
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I will be monitoring for an opportunity to grab VCU in game if a good opp presents itself I couldn’t resist and grabbed VCU ML +120
Well done
1
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I will be monitoring for an opportunity to grab VCU in game if a good opp presents itself I couldn’t resist and grabbed VCU ML +120
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.