All Forums | College Basketball

FRIDAYS SHARPS$$$$$

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 142984
Posts: 973
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 38
Posted: #301
Wow, I am fade material, every pick I've asked about today the charts disagree with....sorry to bother you guys..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 3273
Posted: #302
pools- my buddy told me to pound duke at a 5 and cincy at a 3--- you remember last time we pounded cincy... help !!!

philly- can you please run those---
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 22968
Posted: #303
 MARQUETTE -2 BT 1/2

( PHILLY CHECK THIS ONE PLEASE)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4403
Posted: #304

GOOD MORNING DREAM TEAM...LETS MAKE SOME  TODAY

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 166
Posted: #305

Philly -  Pittsburgh?   This is their first roady of the year (3 neutral) but they are leading all BB in assist to turnover ratio.  Any value?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 2076
Posted: #306
duke at a 5 charts agree
cincy at a 3 charts disagree

MARQUETTE -2 BT 1/2 charts disagree

Just because the charts agree/disagree doesn't make them good or bad picks, just shows there is value or not. Doesn't predict the outcome of the game haha
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 2
Posted: #307
hey guys thanks for the siena pick last night. great call. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 2076
Posted: #308
Pittsburgh charts agree
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 193
Posted: #309
Good morning pool heads!!!!

Michigan st  me likee

Philly-pool, possible value on:

1.  Illinois
2.  South Dakota
3.  Idaho st

What say you?


 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 22968
Posted: #310
 PRINCETON PK 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 611
Posted: #311
Ted... I like think their is value on Illinois too.  Hope they agree
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 2076
Posted: #312
1.  Illinois  agree
2.  South Dakota nothing
3.  Idaho st disagree

PRINCETON PK agree
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 38
Posted: #313

AC--checked on Princeton/Elon earlier and charts slightly agree with Princeton if I remember correctly...

I really like Elon +1 in this spot.  They just knocked off the top Ivy team Columbia not long ago and they're going to be out to make a statement again today at home.  Elon is physical and I don't see Princeton adjusting today.  Just my thoughts....

Would love to hear your insight..........

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 2076
Posted: #314
I know someone will probably ask so here are my best plays today...not poolmans at all so take them for what they are worth

West Virginia
Youngstown
Kansas St
Niagara
Furman

Just the early games.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 166
Posted: #315

Quote Originally Posted by philly387:

duke at a 5 charts agree
cincy at a 3 charts disagree

MARQUETTE -2 BT 1/2 charts disagree

Just because the charts agree/disagree doesn't make them good or bad picks, just shows there is value or not. Doesn't predict the outcome of the game haha

x-cuse my ignorance but what does Duke @ 5, and Cin@ 3 mean? Thanks in advance.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 2702
Posted: #316
[Quote: Originally Posted by tedFRAUD] Good morning pool heads!!!!

Michigan st  me likee

Philly-pool, possible value on:

1.  Illinois
2.  South Dakota
3.  Idaho st

What say you?


Ted, thanks for the SWEEET siena pick yesterday, Sir   
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 41
Posted: #317
What exactly do you mean "duke game at a 5" haha. Sorry if that question seems stupid
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 22968
Posted: #318
 LETS MAKE PRINCETON A 2 UNIT PLAY GUYS
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 193
Posted: #319
Cheers    Mama
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 3273
Posted: #320
wildcard- thats jyst how heavy he is playing them
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 34
Posted: #321
i really want to pull trigger big on Pitt, i know you said charts agree philly. I think after blowing a big lead against cincy last weekend they are gonna come out to prove something this morning. Anyone else like them?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4403
Posted: #322

Quote Originally Posted by ac_bum:

 LETS MAKE PRINCETON A 2 UNIT PLAY GUYS

I'M ON IT WITH YA BROTHA! LETS PRINT THAT PAPER!

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 22968
Posted: #323
Quote Originally Posted by bdg5532:

AC--checked on Princeton/Elon earlier and charts slightly agree with Princeton if I remember correctly...

I really like Elon +1 in this spot.  They just knocked off the top Ivy team Columbia not long ago and they're going to be out to make a statement again today at home.  Elon is physical and I don't see Princeton adjusting today.  Just my thoughts....

Would love to hear your insight..........

IM PLAYING WHAT THE SHORES ARE GIVING ME

SOMETIMES I TWEEK IT A 1/2 -1 PT DEPENDING ON THE MOVEMENT JUST FOR A LITTLE CUSHION
I DONT CAPP BASED ON HISTORY OF GAMES

JUST ON WHAT IM GIVING
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 955
Posted: #324
philly,i really like Providence tonight,appreciate your opinion
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 3716
Posted: #325
Quote Originally Posted by ac_bum:

 LETS MAKE PRINCETON A 2 UNIT PLAY GUYS



Love this play
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.