SU winners: 16 OT record: 3-0 Record on the open: 22-16 Winners because of the Open: 2 Losers because of the Open: 1
Notes: -Sorry
if you had the Terps, that should have been a cover as NCSU didn't show
up in a predictably flat spot. They turned it on late and it wasn't
enough (barely) thanks to everyone going to block a shot allowing my
current favorite college player Alex Len to have his easiest shot all
night close the game out -Xavier got a late bucket from a solid
youngster Semaj Christon to survive at St. Bonaventure, they may be
turning into a solid team -UNLV was 5 or 6 points better on SDSU's
home court, but lackadaisical defense and unfriendly road whistles
(almost blatant) kept the game in doubt until the final minute. Anthony
Marshall picked up where Anthony Bennett couldn't as the freshman looked
rattled in a tough road environment and when he was in foul trouble -The refs in Seattle were horribly biased in the few minutes I watched of the Colorado game. Sad to see
Guesses: UMass 11 FLA 4 MINN 1 DET 8 ILL 12 Duke 18.5 Ucla 13 VCU 8.5 RUT 6 ORE 5.5
leans:
on the radar: MICH +3 USC +2.5
locked in: Texas A&M +10.5 (-110) vs. Florida -Rumors
around Florida have solid defender Casey Prather and stretch 4 Erik
Murphy limited due to injury tomorrow and the Gators have never played
at Reed Arena I don't think. The place would be nuts if the students
were in school, but they may have come back early for the game anyways.
UF will press and make me nervous all night, but TAMU plays two PG at
once and had no problem breaking a decent one that Arkansas brought in
last week. The team is hot after pulling a big upset in Lexington and
Elston Turner's 40 was no mirage. Prather could have guarded him well,
now I think that responsibility is up to Will Yeguete or a smaller guy
like Boynton or Rosario. I like that matchup and I think TAMU's bigs
will make it tough to match them on the interior as UF only likes to
play one at a time (when you consider Murphy a perimeter player). The
Gators could go out and make every long-distance shot they take, but
that is a rare thing when teams hit the road so I will take the 10 1/2
points of insurance.
0
SU winners: 16 OT record: 3-0 Record on the open: 22-16 Winners because of the Open: 2 Losers because of the Open: 1
Notes: -Sorry
if you had the Terps, that should have been a cover as NCSU didn't show
up in a predictably flat spot. They turned it on late and it wasn't
enough (barely) thanks to everyone going to block a shot allowing my
current favorite college player Alex Len to have his easiest shot all
night close the game out -Xavier got a late bucket from a solid
youngster Semaj Christon to survive at St. Bonaventure, they may be
turning into a solid team -UNLV was 5 or 6 points better on SDSU's
home court, but lackadaisical defense and unfriendly road whistles
(almost blatant) kept the game in doubt until the final minute. Anthony
Marshall picked up where Anthony Bennett couldn't as the freshman looked
rattled in a tough road environment and when he was in foul trouble -The refs in Seattle were horribly biased in the few minutes I watched of the Colorado game. Sad to see
Guesses: UMass 11 FLA 4 MINN 1 DET 8 ILL 12 Duke 18.5 Ucla 13 VCU 8.5 RUT 6 ORE 5.5
leans:
on the radar: MICH +3 USC +2.5
locked in: Texas A&M +10.5 (-110) vs. Florida -Rumors
around Florida have solid defender Casey Prather and stretch 4 Erik
Murphy limited due to injury tomorrow and the Gators have never played
at Reed Arena I don't think. The place would be nuts if the students
were in school, but they may have come back early for the game anyways.
UF will press and make me nervous all night, but TAMU plays two PG at
once and had no problem breaking a decent one that Arkansas brought in
last week. The team is hot after pulling a big upset in Lexington and
Elston Turner's 40 was no mirage. Prather could have guarded him well,
now I think that responsibility is up to Will Yeguete or a smaller guy
like Boynton or Rosario. I like that matchup and I think TAMU's bigs
will make it tough to match them on the interior as UF only likes to
play one at a time (when you consider Murphy a perimeter player). The
Gators could go out and make every long-distance shot they take, but
that is a rare thing when teams hit the road so I will take the 10 1/2
points of insurance.
....what about UCI getting +5... occasionally they have been $$ to me...I like USC +2.5 despite firing HC Kevin O’Neill....players will adjust accordingly and play with an intent to win....Ducks dont impress me....only reason quacks beat U of A is they were shooting lights out from downtown
0
....what about UCI getting +5... occasionally they have been $$ to me...I like USC +2.5 despite firing HC Kevin O’Neill....players will adjust accordingly and play with an intent to win....Ducks dont impress me....only reason quacks beat U of A is they were shooting lights out from downtown
....what about UCI getting +5... occasionally they have been $$ to me...I like USC +2.5 despite firing HC Kevin O’Neill....players will adjust accordingly and play with an intent to win....Ducks dont impress me....only reason quacks beat U of A is they were shooting lights out from downtown
Irvine has treated me very well, but I haven't seen many spots I liked in conference play as they won't sneak up on anyone (like they did to both Pac-12 LA schools). I'm also not an Oregon believer but they beat the two best teams out west who aren't named Gonzaga. Line is too short for me to jump on the Trojans but it is probably a winner being this short.
And in other news I somehow screwed up the date again. Man I am awful at that...
0
Quote Originally Posted by GetEveryDollar:
....what about UCI getting +5... occasionally they have been $$ to me...I like USC +2.5 despite firing HC Kevin O’Neill....players will adjust accordingly and play with an intent to win....Ducks dont impress me....only reason quacks beat U of A is they were shooting lights out from downtown
Irvine has treated me very well, but I haven't seen many spots I liked in conference play as they won't sneak up on anyone (like they did to both Pac-12 LA schools). I'm also not an Oregon believer but they beat the two best teams out west who aren't named Gonzaga. Line is too short for me to jump on the Trojans but it is probably a winner being this short.
And in other news I somehow screwed up the date again. Man I am awful at that...
Usc don't score enough to hang with Oregon just my 2 cents lol
Can't blame you for saying that, but oregon's offense isnt made to travel because they take so many perimeter shots. Just like they were hot against Arizona, they could miss everything on the road against a solid defense and lose by 15 when USC beats them up inside
0
Quote Originally Posted by chasingtheline:
Usc don't score enough to hang with Oregon just my 2 cents lol
Can't blame you for saying that, but oregon's offense isnt made to travel because they take so many perimeter shots. Just like they were hot against Arizona, they could miss everything on the road against a solid defense and lose by 15 when USC beats them up inside
Let's say hypothetically, this game was 70-30. And the money was 700 thousand vs 300 thousand.
If Oregon covers Vegas gets smacked now doubt.
That's a no brainer. Anyone without a brain would put their money on Oregon tonight.
But for those of your parlayers tonights, and you've made 5/6 .... be mightly concerned when this game is like 60-46 orgeon , and oregon doesn't make a FG for 5 minutes.
Seen it too many times. This bet isn't safe. Not at all, avoid or bet usc, try to beat the game for once...
0
Let's say hypothetically, this game was 70-30. And the money was 700 thousand vs 300 thousand.
If Oregon covers Vegas gets smacked now doubt.
That's a no brainer. Anyone without a brain would put their money on Oregon tonight.
But for those of your parlayers tonights, and you've made 5/6 .... be mightly concerned when this game is like 60-46 orgeon , and oregon doesn't make a FG for 5 minutes.
Seen it too many times. This bet isn't safe. Not at all, avoid or bet usc, try to beat the game for once...
Let's say hypothetically, this game was 70-30. And the money was 700 thousand vs 300 thousand.
If Oregon covers Vegas gets smacked now doubt.
That's a no brainer. Anyone without a brain would put their money on Oregon tonight.
But for those of your parlayers tonights, and you've made 5/6 .... be mightly concerned when this game is like 60-46 orgeon , and oregon doesn't make a FG for 5 minutes.
Seen it too many times. This bet isn't safe. Not at all, avoid or bet usc, try to beat the game for once...
Agree!
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheRickterScale:
Let's say hypothetically, this game was 70-30. And the money was 700 thousand vs 300 thousand.
If Oregon covers Vegas gets smacked now doubt.
That's a no brainer. Anyone without a brain would put their money on Oregon tonight.
But for those of your parlayers tonights, and you've made 5/6 .... be mightly concerned when this game is like 60-46 orgeon , and oregon doesn't make a FG for 5 minutes.
Seen it too many times. This bet isn't safe. Not at all, avoid or bet usc, try to beat the game for once...
G, I also had Detroit mich higher at 6.5 -7. The line is -3. which is a full 5 points off your predicted line. Detroit is much better than Valpo, played the Cuse tough. biting on the -3. Any thoughts? Highly respect your opinon.
0
G, I also had Detroit mich higher at 6.5 -7. The line is -3. which is a full 5 points off your predicted line. Detroit is much better than Valpo, played the Cuse tough. biting on the -3. Any thoughts? Highly respect your opinon.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
