Welcome! Sure, rugby is permissible as long as the bets are available on the regular sportsbooks. If we can bet it, and its under -129, then add them to the thread! Thanks!
Welcome! Sure, rugby is permissible as long as the bets are available on the regular sportsbooks. If we can bet it, and its under -129, then add them to the thread! Thanks!
I'll start off by saying that I don't look at stats or any ATS or anything like that when I make my picks. I know what I know, I look at the lines, and I jump on what looks like its in my favor. I have watched entire ASU and Colorado games at least 15 times each this year, and this line looks like a winner to me. That's why I bet it. I don't care one bit about stats. I only bet what I know. I tell EVERYBODY to stay away from "capping stats" because they don't do anything except help you convince yourself to make a bet. Your eyes are always a better tool than anything you will find on a website.
As for the "everyone is on it" strategy, I don't see how 8 people on some random message board posting "I am on Colorado also" can effect how a game is going to play out, but everyone "caps" the way they want. I don't care about anyone else's bets. I care if others win, but what they bet on has no effect on how I make my bets. That makes no sense to me.
Also, the "IPFW megaload yesterday" you mention is not from this thread and I have no idea what you are talking about. There were 15 $$$$'s posted yesterday and ZERO of them were on IPFW.
If you are talking about the "IPFW megaload" the thread clearly had on Thursday, then I will give you that one. That was by far the most one-sided this thread has ever been on a single play in the month I have been here. I think at least 90% of the thread was on that play. Of course, it was the easiest winner of the day and everyone cashed.
I'll start off by saying that I don't look at stats or any ATS or anything like that when I make my picks. I know what I know, I look at the lines, and I jump on what looks like its in my favor. I have watched entire ASU and Colorado games at least 15 times each this year, and this line looks like a winner to me. That's why I bet it. I don't care one bit about stats. I only bet what I know. I tell EVERYBODY to stay away from "capping stats" because they don't do anything except help you convince yourself to make a bet. Your eyes are always a better tool than anything you will find on a website.
As for the "everyone is on it" strategy, I don't see how 8 people on some random message board posting "I am on Colorado also" can effect how a game is going to play out, but everyone "caps" the way they want. I don't care about anyone else's bets. I care if others win, but what they bet on has no effect on how I make my bets. That makes no sense to me.
Also, the "IPFW megaload yesterday" you mention is not from this thread and I have no idea what you are talking about. There were 15 $$$$'s posted yesterday and ZERO of them were on IPFW.
If you are talking about the "IPFW megaload" the thread clearly had on Thursday, then I will give you that one. That was by far the most one-sided this thread has ever been on a single play in the month I have been here. I think at least 90% of the thread was on that play. Of course, it was the easiest winner of the day and everyone cashed.
Thanks Kaner. Glad you could benefit. Thanks fro the post!
Thanks Kaner. Glad you could benefit. Thanks fro the post!
Glad they won, but they should have won that game 5 different times. Friggin' Sterling is trash. The guy is useless. I'd rather have Navas in there every game.
Glad they won, but they should have won that game 5 different times. Friggin' Sterling is trash. The guy is useless. I'd rather have Navas in there every game.
Glad they won, but they should have won that game 5 different times. Friggin' Sterling is trash. The guy is useless. I'd rather have Navas in there every game.
Glad they won, but they should have won that game 5 different times. Friggin' Sterling is trash. The guy is useless. I'd rather have Navas in there every game.
Yeah, there was a clear PK left out there and Sterling should have scored at least 3 times. Not a big deal as they got the trophy, but that is a tired team and it would have been really nice to not have to play that extra 30. I guess the good news is that they play Liverpool on Wednesday again anyway, so they will be tired too.
Really wish Leicester hadn't gotten that late goal to get that 3 points. Would have been great if they could have dropped 2 there......
Yeah, there was a clear PK left out there and Sterling should have scored at least 3 times. Not a big deal as they got the trophy, but that is a tired team and it would have been really nice to not have to play that extra 30. I guess the good news is that they play Liverpool on Wednesday again anyway, so they will be tired too.
Really wish Leicester hadn't gotten that late goal to get that 3 points. Would have been great if they could have dropped 2 there......
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.