I always liked Syracuse, and think Jim is a good dude. Leave the guy alone, i'm sure he didn't know anything about this. He's no Joe Paterno.
Jim Boeheim is a stand up guy in my opinion......
It's a bit fishy to me that this dude was still blowing Bernie at age 27/28.....and that tape has no timeline reference on when anything took place. It mentions kid. Was this an 18 yr old kid. There is nothing definitive with this yet
It's a bit fishy to me that this dude was still blowing Bernie at age 27/28.....and that tape has no timeline reference on when anything took place. It mentions kid. Was this an 18 yr old kid. There is nothing definitive with this yet
It's a bit fishy to me that this dude was still blowing Bernie at age 27/28.....and that tape has no timeline reference on when anything took place. It mentions kid. Was this an 18 yr old kid. There is nothing definitive with this yet
It's a bit fishy to me that this dude was still blowing Bernie at age 27/28.....and that tape has no timeline reference on when anything took place. It mentions kid. Was this an 18 yr old kid. There is nothing definitive with this yet
It's a bit fishy to me that this dude was still blowing Bernie at age 27/28.....and that tape has no timeline reference on when anything took place. It mentions kid. Was this an 18 yr old kid. There is nothing definitive with this yet
It's a bit fishy to me that this dude was still blowing Bernie at age 27/28.....and that tape has no timeline reference on when anything took place. It mentions kid. Was this an 18 yr old kid. There is nothing definitive with this yet
Meanwhile questions are growing over why the tape was in ESPN's possession since former team ball boy Mr Davis legally recorded it nearly a decade ago.
The network said it didn't air it until Sunday because it didn't have corroboration. ESPN added that it hired a voice-recognition expert who said the voice on the recording matches Mrs Fine's.
Meanwhile questions are growing over why the tape was in ESPN's possession since former team ball boy Mr Davis legally recorded it nearly a decade ago.
The network said it didn't air it until Sunday because it didn't have corroboration. ESPN added that it hired a voice-recognition expert who said the voice on the recording matches Mrs Fine's.
Anyway, in June 2003, after the Post-Standard closed its investigation, Davis contacted ESPN and repeated his allegations concerning Bernie Fine and sent it the tape of his conversation with Laurie Fine. It isn’t clear who Davis contacted at ESPN—someone at the network, the magazine, the website, or all three. (One assumes that if any one of the three branches knew about it, then all must have.)
Jump to 2005. The university said it conducted its own investigation after being “contacted by an adult male who told us that he had reported to the Syracuse City Police that he had been subjected to inappropriate contact by an associate men’s basketball coach. The alleged activity took place in the 1980's and 1990's. We were informed by the complainant that the Syracuse City Police had declined to pursue the matter because the statute of limitations had expired.
Anyway, in June 2003, after the Post-Standard closed its investigation, Davis contacted ESPN and repeated his allegations concerning Bernie Fine and sent it the tape of his conversation with Laurie Fine. It isn’t clear who Davis contacted at ESPN—someone at the network, the magazine, the website, or all three. (One assumes that if any one of the three branches knew about it, then all must have.)
Jump to 2005. The university said it conducted its own investigation after being “contacted by an adult male who told us that he had reported to the Syracuse City Police that he had been subjected to inappropriate contact by an associate men’s basketball coach. The alleged activity took place in the 1980's and 1990's. We were informed by the complainant that the Syracuse City Police had declined to pursue the matter because the statute of limitations had expired.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.