All Forums | College Basketball

I have won 16 of 22 games with a system I have been using ONLY in NCAA B-Ball

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 11062
Posts: 147
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 10460
Posted: #26
TENN will be the correct play tomorrow...

I use the overall stats for when a team has played less than 3 games aways from home. HOME and AWAY when its over 4 games... Small conference like the ivy league get a point for home court. mid majors 2 pts. and the powerhouse 3 pts. Unless its at DUKE or UNC i will go up to 4 pts...


There is more that i use to it this is just the basics of it. It is not working for me right now. It reall progress well the further you get into the season which should be any fucking time! HAHA but the faded systems plays have been phenomenal going 10-1-1 with 3 ML winners.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 10460
Posted: #27
I have UCLA by 34 tomorrow "double the spread or more" thats why it can be consider a play
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 127
Posted: #28
thanks, i really do appreciate it, does this work for the NBA as well?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 154
Posted: #29
Good system. Why didn't you try it on the Florida International game? I did and lost. By my math Miami should have only given 15 points. they gave 22.5 and I still lost. Please respond. Thanks.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 3924
Posted: #30
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 773
Posted: #31
So what are this system's plays for tomorrow??? Im definitely curious to track this cause there r sooo many games on.....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 214
Posted: #32
ok............if ohio st fav by 8
 butler ppg 69 give up 55
ohio st ppg 66 give up 50
 
now show system please
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 37
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by FATPAUL:

Good system. Why didn't you try it on the Florida International game? I did and lost. By my math Miami should have only given 15 points. they gave 22.5 and I still lost. Please respond. Thanks.

 

Hey man, I'm trying to track this too. Miami was the 61.05% consensus pick on wagerline. The system says "but NEVER BET WITH THE PUBLIC!!!!!! UNLESS the favorite is getting less than 55% support." So if I've got this right, it should have been a non play.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 15191
Posted: #34
t
Quote Originally Posted by FATPAUL:

Good system. Why didn't you try it on the Florida International game? I did and lost. By my math Miami should have only given 15 points. they gave 22.5 and I still lost. Please respond. Thanks.


It comes to a point where the line is to high or low. the Fl Int is a no play because the line was to high. Thats why i didnt post it
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 15191
Posted: #35
Yes your right Casey
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 15191
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by Bird4332:

TENN will be the correct play tomorrow...

I use the overall stats for when a team has played less than 3 games aways from home. HOME and AWAY when its over 4 games... Small conference like the ivy league get a point for home court. mid majors 2 pts. and the powerhouse 3 pts. Unless its at DUKE or UNC i will go up to 4 pts...


There is more that i use to it this is just the basics of it. It is not working for me right now. It reall progress well the further you get into the season which should be any fucking time! HAHA but the faded systems plays have been phenomenal going 10-1-1 with 3 ML winners.



Wrong. Tenn should be -14. They are -7 therefore the play should be on Temple.+7

They should be getting 14 and they are only getting 7. Its a play for Temple. Or a no play. Looks like the Public fell into the trap. TEMPLE +7 is a PLAY
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 54
Posted: #37
got it now. thanks rage.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 54
Posted: #38
so would indiana purdue bea no play because the publice is higher than55% onthe favorite?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 717
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by Bird4332:

Fer you got but you have add in home court for a big game like this at temp add another 3  points so TENN -11...


Here is the 3 games i have lined up for tomorrow

KU, PURDUE, AND UCLA FOR MY FADED SYSTEM PLAYS...


So, do you mean that the play for you is KU, Purdue and UCLA or that you are fading these teams?  I am guessing that you are fading these teams from the looks of the numbers, but if I am wrong it would be interesting to know.

Thanks.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 154
Posted: #40
if miami at 61% (greater than 55%) should have been a non play, then why was drake at 75% popular support okay to bet. Sorry, I'm still a little confused. Please respond.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 3103
Posted: #41
it want georgia southern was the play
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 154
Posted: #42
thats what i bet and lost. thye said it was a noplay because of the high % of people on the miami side of things. thats why im confused.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 3087
Posted: #43
If I understand the system, the following qualify as plays:
 
Ohio St. -8.5
Temple +7
MiaOH -15
NC Greensboro +13.5
Oregon St. +7.5
 
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 537
Posted: #44
banging temple +7 big
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 593
Posted: #45

What about Harvard & Geo Wash.

Geo -10.5 and 82% public, calculations are Geo should be +2,

so Harvard Big play?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 74
Posted: #46
thanks for the info Raginstorm.  by my calculations E. Kentucky should be a 10 point fav. but are getting 5 ?????? Who's the pick?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2384
Posted: #47
So if i'm getting this right and lets just say that this works with nba jus as well... jus sayin......

cavs score 103 avg       hawks score 97 avg = 6

cavs allow 90 avg          hawks allow 96      =  6

meaning spread should be 12

actual spread is - 5.5 (greater than 6 points diff)

and I dont know where to find the actual public numbers but I would assume everyone is riding on cavs....

hawks + 5.5 is a PLAY?


crap, i think i might have to counter my bet and swallow the juice
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 270
Posted: #48
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 101
Posted: #49
guys, google betting trends and you can find some sites to view or you can check out sports insights.com  my advice find several sites to view these numbers just in case some are mis leading.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1251
Posted: #50
scoresandodds has all the info ur lookin for they green star matchups that have the spread wrong  it does not always work  then i have seen it go 10-0 for a few days
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.