-Minny is offensively challenged and prefer a tighter game....while they might break out on Morgan St and score a higher total, this Morgan St team stayed with the #1 team and only lost by 27! ....I just might make this one a DOUBLE UP type of matchup in my mind but its only one hour apart from the Hofstra game so just 1U for now
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Morgan St. +23.5 x 1U
-Minny is offensively challenged and prefer a tighter game....while they might break out on Morgan St and score a higher total, this Morgan St team stayed with the #1 team and only lost by 27! ....I just might make this one a DOUBLE UP type of matchup in my mind but its only one hour apart from the Hofstra game so just 1U for now
-scratching my head on this one....Belmont with a prodigious offense and terrible defense....Drake with a great defense and has a lot of firepower if needed on offense.....they know each other so I predict Belmont will push the pace or shoot many 3 pters and this will force Drake into a faster game and more scoring themselves
Really liking today's lines....but sometimes when I play too many, my results can go SPLAT ....or shine like in the King of Covers where some large play days were hitting 65%+
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Belmont - Drake Over 141.5 x HALF U
-scratching my head on this one....Belmont with a prodigious offense and terrible defense....Drake with a great defense and has a lot of firepower if needed on offense.....they know each other so I predict Belmont will push the pace or shoot many 3 pters and this will force Drake into a faster game and more scoring themselves
Really liking today's lines....but sometimes when I play too many, my results can go SPLAT ....or shine like in the King of Covers where some large play days were hitting 65%+
-have not lost a triple D-UP this year and I am due (50 - 30 now in King of Covers and its the only play I have made today)
-USF tends to smoke ECU in this matchup and won by 20+ last year
-only concern about ECU is their offensive rebounding but USF is strong at home ....one of the best over the years no matter how strong their team is and in the rankings, both teams are close
-USF can score and I expect them to win today....will it be by -2?
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
South Florida -1.5DOUBLE UP finisher x 4U
-have not lost a triple D-UP this year and I am due (50 - 30 now in King of Covers and its the only play I have made today)
-USF tends to smoke ECU in this matchup and won by 20+ last year
-only concern about ECU is their offensive rebounding but USF is strong at home ....one of the best over the years no matter how strong their team is and in the rankings, both teams are close
-USF can score and I expect them to win today....will it be by -2?
North Texas -6 x 1U....this is a double high ATS success play..... if I were down units, I would consider pressing but no need since my ability to find ones like this should continue to hit almost 7 out of 10 times
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
North Texas -6 x 1U....this is a double high ATS success play..... if I were down units, I would consider pressing but no need since my ability to find ones like this should continue to hit almost 7 out of 10 times
Chattanooga ML + S.Illinois Half U parlay > pays close to $60
-Mocs have not lost to Mercer in a long time
Drake -6.5 x 1UDOUBLE UP PLAYstarted .....
-UIC tends to play them tough....but we are talking about a Top 10 team this year with a top 3 defense playing a good, but NOT GREAT UIC team
TEASER HALF U: - 7 PTS > RICE +7.5 (100 ranks higher than Tulsa!) with IUPUI +11.5 (was considering the fade anyway with my correlation chart saying play a fade on Youngstown) with MIDDIES:
1. N.Iowa -1
2. Belmont +11
3. Valpo +10
4. Missouri St E
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Plays on New Years Day:
S. Illinois Parlay Half U > pays over $75
ML + Under 137.5 combo
Chattanooga ML + S.Illinois Half U parlay > pays close to $60
-Mocs have not lost to Mercer in a long time
Drake -6.5 x 1UDOUBLE UP PLAYstarted .....
-UIC tends to play them tough....but we are talking about a Top 10 team this year with a top 3 defense playing a good, but NOT GREAT UIC team
TEASER HALF U: - 7 PTS > RICE +7.5 (100 ranks higher than Tulsa!) with IUPUI +11.5 (was considering the fade anyway with my correlation chart saying play a fade on Youngstown) with MIDDIES:
Tomorrow - lots of games and low lines because of conference play.... I strongly suggest you keep track of who wins the first game and then check when they play again and take the opposite winner no matter who is at home or not UNLESS....you see the one side dominating most times out of the past 10 games they played (8/10 or better win rate )
Since you guys are seeing first matchups, I think my correlation chart of plotting every rank results and also how the spread does is going to help out. Since I had such a bad day ....I am going to offer the DOUBLE uptick arrowed plays that are good rank combo correlations AND best spreads with them = double positive correlation
You look at the matchups and decide which one you like. I will list mine but here are the double positve matchups for favorites;
Maryland -6.5 > huge respect for this team but its their first west coast trip but facing a team ranked in the 90's
SIUEdward -7.5
Liberty -8
UNC Wilmington -6
Monmouth -6.5
Tennessee Tech -3.5
N. Dakota -4
VERY COLD WEATHER creeping into the midwest strongly tomorrow so you may want to look at the home teams since the visitors might have a rough flight and not like the cold shock they will feel.....home team is used to it from waking up and coming to arena for shoot around or warmup 2x already
My very best FADE plays or DOUBLE NEGATIVES that I found: - again, check out the matchup and YOU select
CSN Northridge -5 @ Cal Fullerton
UC Riverside -4.5 @ Long Beach
High Point -8.5 at home vs Radford
I will look at all of these tomorrow and make my OWN final determinations .....and report
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Tomorrow - lots of games and low lines because of conference play.... I strongly suggest you keep track of who wins the first game and then check when they play again and take the opposite winner no matter who is at home or not UNLESS....you see the one side dominating most times out of the past 10 games they played (8/10 or better win rate )
Since you guys are seeing first matchups, I think my correlation chart of plotting every rank results and also how the spread does is going to help out. Since I had such a bad day ....I am going to offer the DOUBLE uptick arrowed plays that are good rank combo correlations AND best spreads with them = double positive correlation
You look at the matchups and decide which one you like. I will list mine but here are the double positve matchups for favorites;
Maryland -6.5 > huge respect for this team but its their first west coast trip but facing a team ranked in the 90's
SIUEdward -7.5
Liberty -8
UNC Wilmington -6
Monmouth -6.5
Tennessee Tech -3.5
N. Dakota -4
VERY COLD WEATHER creeping into the midwest strongly tomorrow so you may want to look at the home teams since the visitors might have a rough flight and not like the cold shock they will feel.....home team is used to it from waking up and coming to arena for shoot around or warmup 2x already
My very best FADE plays or DOUBLE NEGATIVES that I found: - again, check out the matchup and YOU select
CSN Northridge -5 @ Cal Fullerton
UC Riverside -4.5 @ Long Beach
High Point -8.5 at home vs Radford
I will look at all of these tomorrow and make my OWN final determinations .....and report
UNCWilm or Monmouth....I picked the wrong spread....ah well. Its why I have slowed down. I sense a tide turning for a little while and it happens to bettors.
Slow down is how you handle it and wait till you are in the clear with 2-3 winning days before you handle more volume
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
UNCWilm or Monmouth....I picked the wrong spread....ah well. Its why I have slowed down. I sense a tide turning for a little while and it happens to bettors.
Slow down is how you handle it and wait till you are in the clear with 2-3 winning days before you handle more volume
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.