All Forums | College Basketball

NCAAB TUES

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 34913
Posts: 295
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #276

2-3 Tuesday

YTD: 121-77-7 (+130.55U)

ISU YTD: 5-1-1 (+19.50U)

NM -7.5 (10U)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 3830
Posted: #277

great call on new mexico thanks

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 619
Posted: #278
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:

 

No thoughts buddy focused on tomorrow.


spoken by a true capper! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 233
Posted: #279
These haters are hillarious.  GTFO.  They are just waiting for UNC to have an off day.  Get em tomorrow UNC, some good looking games
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 57
Posted: #280

I knew UNI was the better team, shoulda put money down. Atleast my Birds showed they are legit.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 57
Posted: #281
Oh ya and my mancrush Osiris Eldridge (pictured) dismanteled a very good shockers team pouring on 26 points (6-9 from 3).
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3484
Posted: #282
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:

2-3 Tuesday

YTD: 121-77-7 (+130.55U)

ISU YTD: 5-1-1 (+19.50U)

NM -7.5 (10U)





 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 97
Posted: #283
UNC come on ... Don't deny the CUSE no more ... just dont 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #284

Quote Originally Posted by BettingBuffalo:

UNC come on ... Don't deny the CUSE no more ... just dont 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 12122
Posted: #285
 lets get em tomorrow
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 929
Posted: #286
Great job UNC.  I tailed you and probably cost you 2 of your losses.  I am that cold right now.  The only game I played on my own was Belmont and that was rough.  I'll leave you alone until I get my own stuff down.  I don't want to screw up your mojo any more than I have.

todd
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1128
Posted: #287
thanks isu. nothing else to do in central ill but play ball.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 53
Posted: #288
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:

 

That game was in question just about the whole way

Looked way to easy/ = No Play!

Your one of a kind UNC...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 57
Posted: #289
Quote Originally Posted by money_4sure:

That game was in question just about the whole way

Looked way to easy/ = No Play!

Your one of a kind UNC...

Looked too easy? That game was a no play from the start. UNI returned all 5 starters off a first place finish in the Valley last year. Proved to be good in their Non-con. Creighton had a losing record! Honestly, UNC does some great analysis of games but he puts way to much weight in prior years performances. Stop giving us the what these teams did in their last 10 meetings or whatever. Every year is a completely new team. CU is not the same team as they were last year and UNI returned everybody. If you bet on this game its your own fault. Other than home court advantage give me one legit reason why this was even a remotely decent looking play.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 97
Posted: #290
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:

 



 Sorry dude I'll take my money
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 97
Posted: #291
Valley Fan your commenting on the wrong game. And UNC / money 4 sho , If you think a game looks too easy and decide to no play then thats legit I agree. If you lean toward the other side then your just a fool in my mind. CUSE is legit and it's about time everyone realizes this ... easy cash money I am sorry if you fail to realize it. I can respect anyone if they decided not to play either side but I shun anyone who dare bet against the CUSE with a line of -3. 

You guys are all just naively falling into the oddsmakers' mind games.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #292
Quote Originally Posted by ValleyFan:

Looked too easy? That game was a no play from the start. UNI returned all 5 starters off a first place finish in the Valley last year. Proved to be good in their Non-con. Creighton had a losing record! Honestly, UNC does some great analysis of games but he puts way to much weight in prior years performances. Stop giving us the what these teams did in their last 10 meetings or whatever. Every year is a completely new team. CU is not the same team as they were last year and UNI returned everybody. If you bet on this game its your own fault. Other than home court advantage give me one legit reason why this was even a remotely decent looking play.

 

So why not just say DANA ALTMAN IS THE JOKE OF THE MVC?

FROM MY UNDERSTANDING HE HAS PUT THIS CONF. ON THE MAP IN THE LAST DECADE. I DONT CARE IF PLAYERS CHANGE HE STILL BRINGS IN PLAYERS AND THEY GROW INTO THE SYSTEM QUICKLY. 

Cant believe your going to try and tell my I put to much emphasis into history? I guess every win and every unit won up above is fraud.

WHAT TEAMS HAS UNI BEAT THAT STICKS OUT TO YOU? CAUSE I DONT SEE ONE.

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #293
Quote Originally Posted by BettingBuffalo:



 Sorry dude I'll take my money

 

Couldn't have been much sense it was a small play. For someone hyping this team you sure have small balls not to lay it on them on such a short line.

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #294
Quote Originally Posted by BettingBuffalo:

Valley Fan your commenting on the wrong game. And UNC / money 4 sho , If you think a game looks too easy and decide to no play then thats legit I agree. If you lean toward the other side then your just a fool in my mind. CUSE is legit and it's about time everyone realizes this ... easy cash money I am sorry if you fail to realize it. I can respect anyone if they decided not to play either side but I shun anyone who dare bet against the CUSE with a line of -3. 

You guys are all just naively falling into the oddsmakers' mind games.

 

Blah Blah Blah...

 

So what are we when they are dogged at WVU in a few weeks?

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 57
Posted: #295
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:

 

So why not just say DANA ALTMAN IS THE JOKE OF THE MVC?

FROM MY UNDERSTANDING HE HAS PUT THIS CONF. ON THE MAP IN THE LAST DECADE. I DONT CARE IF PLAYERS CHANGE HE STILL BRINGS IN PLAYERS AND THEY GROW INTO THE SYSTEM QUICKLY. 

Cant believe your going to try and tell my I put to much emphasis into history? I guess every win and every unit won up above is fraud.

WHAT TEAMS HAS UNI BEAT THAT STICKS OUT TO YOU? CAUSE I DONT SEE ONE.

 

 

Wins against Sienna, Boston College, Iowa State all stick out to me. RPI of 26 also sticks out. CU has shown game after game that they can't beat good teams this year. Dana has his weakest team of the decade on the court now. The line should of been in favor of UNI from the start, then maybe you could make the arguement CU was a good play. Not that I'm great at picking winners, I was just really confused about the lovefeast for this play.

All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.