All Forums | College Basketball

NCAAB TUES

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 34913
Posts: 295
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #26

Quote Originally Posted by BettingBuffalo:

You guys can make all these arguments you want but CUSE has manhandled really good teams including UNC and Florida ... and honestly West Virginia has not had a lot of tough opponents and may have not been ready for the tough Big East Conference teams, where as Syracuse might be. Better coaching, better defense .. the works .. -3 does seem too easy, just like Indy -1 @ Bal seems too easy as well... but at the very least it deserves a small wager. 

 

First off INDY -1 was not a easy bet as I had a big wager on it and they barely snuck by, There was nothing easy about the game.

 

I am not betting this game but if I did it is SH. I have seen these type of lines to long whether you like it or not the team that is supposed to be better fucks you in the long run.

Line looks exactly like NOVA/TEMP. I will put a dime on it that this is a pound play from PUCK.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

UNC..... I think K St -18 is nice because they should smoke Cleve St and I really like Long Beach St +23.5 @ Duke....They are long and atheletic and should be able to hang with the dookies....maybe win su

thoughts??

 

 

Don't like betting against Duke at home unless they are playing against top notch competition...

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #28

2-1-2 Monday

YTD: 119-74-7 (+165.05U)

ISU YTD: 4-1-1 (+14.50U)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1893
Posted: #29
UNC I see Purdue at -12 ?? is it still good??
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1893
Posted: #30
ma bad didnt read the thread properly ..
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 10748
Posted: #31
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 97
Posted: #32
I am not talking about unworthy of top 5 Villanova here.. I was with you on Temple, I am talking about SYRACUSE a team proven they could beat quality teams. Sorry UNC, you might be hating on Syracuse a little bit. You've bet against them in every major game including Florida +3.5 in the state of Florida.

My comparison to Indy -1 was that this is another game where the public will be 80-90% on a side. The public will win sometimes... honestly the only reason this line is so low is because it is Syracuse's first road game.... the oddsmakers are sneaky which is why ppl can heavily question this but in my mind, like indy -1, it is worth a small wager to me.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 2353
Posted: #33
good job today unc. i didn't see your neveda bet so I end up making nutting but I lost alot on nba today, so I hope I could get those money back by tailing you tomorrow, hehe
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by BettingBuffalo:

I am not talking about unworthy of top 5 Villanova here.. I was with you on Temple, I am talking about SYRACUSE a team proven they could beat quality teams. Sorry UNC, you might be hating on Syracuse a little bit. You've bet against them in every major game including Florida +3.5 in the state of Florida.

My comparison to Indy -1 was that this is another game where the public will be 80-90% on a side. The public will win sometimes... honestly the only reason this line is so low is because it is Syracuse's first road game.... the oddsmakers are sneaky which is why ppl can heavily question this but in my mind, like indy -1, it is worth a small wager to me.

 

GL to you.

 

There is only a select few guys that can talk me into a play and none are posting in the college hoops forum right now.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 97
Posted: #35
lol I'm not trying to convince you.... I honestly couldn't care less 

It's just going to be satisfying when your wrong
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 53
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by BettingBuffalo:

lol I'm not trying to convince you.... I honestly couldn't care less 

It's just going to be satisfying when your wrong

Stop back in tomorrow after the game to say your sorry...Have not been paying attention to UNC's ability in capping these games! I would also venture to say that if he decides in not making a play on a game, and this certain game comes through (as you are implying) he will not loose much sleep over it...now UNC may loose sleep being up have the night counting his money from his own personally capped games...but hardly think he even gives you a second thought tomorrow night if Cuse covers the (-3)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 344
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by money_4sure:

Stop back in tomorrow after the game to say your sorry...Have not been paying attention to UNC's ability in capping these games! I would also venture to say that if he decides in not making a play on a game, and this certain game comes through (as you are implying) he will not loose much sleep over it...now UNC may loose sleep being up have the night counting his money from his own personally capped games...but hardly think he even gives you a second thought tomorrow night if Cuse covers the (-3)



I am on cuse and purdue tomorrow also... will be looking out for your plays though!

regardless of what happens, BOL to ya! Made a few bucks on some of your plays this seasons =)
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 10705
Posted: #38
Keep it up buddy!! Loving ILL ST myself. That line really surprises me, and they are at home!! GL Tuesday with all plays!! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1098
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:

 

First off INDY -1 was not a easy bet as I had a big wager on it and they barely snuck by, There was nothing easy about the game.

 

I am not betting this game but if I did it is SH. I have seen these type of lines to long whether you like it or not the team that is supposed to be better fucks you in the long run.

Line looks exactly like NOVA/TEMP. I will put a dime on it that this is a pound play from PUCK.

lol why on earth would you think that??? Cuse is gonna be a square play tomorrow and we all know it. putting out a line of -3.5 here is just begging for you to take them, and hopefully it does rise to about 4.5 or 5 in which case you have to be on Seton Hall. SH has the athletes to guard this cuse team and in my opinion will have the best player on the court in Jeremy Hazell. Cuse outrebounds teams and thats how they put teams away, I don't think they can do that with this SH team. I think you smart enough to know that if this line climbs you gotta be on SH.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1098
Posted: #40
and by the way I'm a UNC fan and everyone knows that the time to catch the Heels was early this year. I all year have thought that this would be a down year for them, as guard play is key in college basketball and the UNC guards just haven't proven or played against the competition that is division 1 college basketball. and Florida I think is getting a lot of hype early on this season which I think is undeserved.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 8640
Posted: #41
you should really first look at number of posts when someone makes a claim like that

if it's well under 1000, they should be grinned at and ignored...

I mean come on... anyone in need of attention can make an account and come challenge UNC about a play... this is just useless spam (not his initial info/writeup, but the 'satisfying when you're wrong' line).
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1422
Posted: #42

Quote Originally Posted by MuggsyBogues:

you should really first look at number of posts when someone makes a claim like that

if it's well under 1000, they should be grinned at and ignored...

I mean come on... anyone in need of attention can make an account and come challenge UNC about a play... this is just useless spam (not his initial info/writeup, but the 'satisfying when you're wrong' line).

...thank-you, sir!

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 120
Posted: #43
N. Iowa, ill St., NMex, Marq early leans
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 40
Posted: #44
what about marq +12 think thats alot for an opener in big east  but wva plays well at home ... .... but not 12 points better imo
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 76
Posted: #45
May want to take a strong look at

Penn State + 11.5 @ Minnesota

PSU won outright @ UVA, lost by 3 @ Temple. Talor Battle will keep them in this one, getting 19/6/3 averages.

Minnesota's last 5 games against Brown, Morgan St., St. Joes, NIU, and South Dakota St. don't instill alot of confidence.

Plus it's the Big 10... I smell a 56-53 unwatchable Minny win and PSU cover.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 233
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by BettingBuffalo:

lol I'm not trying to convince you.... I honestly couldn't care less 

It's just going to be satisfying when your wrong

Seton Hall

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 33531
Posted: #47

Good Luck UNC

On Marq as well tonight.  WV hasent shown me they are as good as ESPN tells them they are. 

I hope my Orangemen prove you wrong tonight

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 594
Posted: #48


Good luck UNCforever,
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 37
Posted: #49

I have to go PURDUE -12.0

I have a write up

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 37
Posted: #50
and U 131.0
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.