clearly that was a flagrant 1 end of story intent has nothing to do with it he made cpntact above shoulders so according to the rules its flagrant but on the other fuck marquette they didnt deserve that call cuz they didnt even show up 2nite and fucked me pretty hard
0
clearly that was a flagrant 1 end of story intent has nothing to do with it he made cpntact above shoulders so according to the rules its flagrant but on the other fuck marquette they didnt deserve that call cuz they didnt even show up 2nite and fucked me pretty hard
I totally disagree,,, the guy was tightroping the endline to stay in bounds, he swung his arm out to maintian balance,,, no way he was trying to land a tooth loosener, what in the world would he do that for at that point in time,, he seemed to be in control mentally and emotionally..
My main point is that its just one more box rule that just doen't belong in real comptitive sports,, especially the abitilty to turn back time and review it,,what a joke,, if it's not blatent enough to be called in live time,,, so be it,, thats sports ,(or at least it used to be).
Sorry but there is no way that Marquette deserved a point and a turnover for that minor accident, that wasn't even called live.
once again, marquette was losing this game regardless, and the elbow was entirely accidental. But the rule for a flagrant 1 doesn't require intent, accidental elbows still fall within the category. I agree that the rule is weak and accidental contact like that shouldn't merit ft's and the ball, but they should ref according to the retarded rules that they make up
0
Quote Originally Posted by iceman67:
I totally disagree,,, the guy was tightroping the endline to stay in bounds, he swung his arm out to maintian balance,,, no way he was trying to land a tooth loosener, what in the world would he do that for at that point in time,, he seemed to be in control mentally and emotionally..
My main point is that its just one more box rule that just doen't belong in real comptitive sports,, especially the abitilty to turn back time and review it,,what a joke,, if it's not blatent enough to be called in live time,,, so be it,, thats sports ,(or at least it used to be).
Sorry but there is no way that Marquette deserved a point and a turnover for that minor accident, that wasn't even called live.
once again, marquette was losing this game regardless, and the elbow was entirely accidental. But the rule for a flagrant 1 doesn't require intent, accidental elbows still fall within the category. I agree that the rule is weak and accidental contact like that shouldn't merit ft's and the ball, but they should ref according to the retarded rules that they make up
I totally disagree,,, the guy was tightroping the endline to stay in bounds, he swung his arm out to maintian balance,,, no way he was trying to land a tooth loosener, what in the world would he do that for at that point in time,, he seemed to be in control mentally and emotionally..
My main point is that its just one more box rule that just doen't belong in real comptitive sports,, especially the abitilty to turn back time and review it,,what a joke,, if it's not blatent enough to be called in live time,,, so be it,, thats sports ,(or at least it used to be).
Sorry but there is no way that Marquette deserved a point and a turnover for that minor accident, that wasn't even called live.
Maybe so...but it is the RULE. Accidental or not. Doesn't matter. Intent has nothing to do with it. Intent and severity determines if it is a flagrant 1 or 2. A lot less has been called a flagrant 1 this year. I am not saying MU would've won or that they deserved anything...all I am saying is that it is a call they have to make.
0
Quote Originally Posted by iceman67:
I totally disagree,,, the guy was tightroping the endline to stay in bounds, he swung his arm out to maintian balance,,, no way he was trying to land a tooth loosener, what in the world would he do that for at that point in time,, he seemed to be in control mentally and emotionally..
My main point is that its just one more box rule that just doen't belong in real comptitive sports,, especially the abitilty to turn back time and review it,,what a joke,, if it's not blatent enough to be called in live time,,, so be it,, thats sports ,(or at least it used to be).
Sorry but there is no way that Marquette deserved a point and a turnover for that minor accident, that wasn't even called live.
Maybe so...but it is the RULE. Accidental or not. Doesn't matter. Intent has nothing to do with it. Intent and severity determines if it is a flagrant 1 or 2. A lot less has been called a flagrant 1 this year. I am not saying MU would've won or that they deserved anything...all I am saying is that it is a call they have to make.
The thing i hate the most is that they call it when the fucking want, i dont care that is a weak rule, as long as they are consistent with it, but of course the refs cant do that
0
The thing i hate the most is that they call it when the fucking want, i dont care that is a weak rule, as long as they are consistent with it, but of course the refs cant do that
Stop complaining. You shouldn't have bet on Marquette in the first place. You lost because you bet on an overrated team without doing your research, not because the refs didn't call a flagrant.
Are you a fucking moron? Obviously my 'Quette bet was shit. Even if they made the call doesn't mean they win, but atleast give them the chance to play it out. Just have some damn consistency with the way the games are called.
0
Quote Originally Posted by poltergasm:
Stop complaining. You shouldn't have bet on Marquette in the first place. You lost because you bet on an overrated team without doing your research, not because the refs didn't call a flagrant.
Are you a fucking moron? Obviously my 'Quette bet was shit. Even if they made the call doesn't mean they win, but atleast give them the chance to play it out. Just have some damn consistency with the way the games are called.
stupidest thread i have ever seen. you guys obviously make wrong call and are hanging on to this non-disputed call like it cost you your bet. Who ever took marquette was on the wrong side. Get over it. That wasn't an obvious call at all. You conspiracy pieces of shit make me sick.
0
stupidest thread i have ever seen. you guys obviously make wrong call and are hanging on to this non-disputed call like it cost you your bet. Who ever took marquette was on the wrong side. Get over it. That wasn't an obvious call at all. You conspiracy pieces of shit make me sick.
I don't think I'm a fucking moron, but some may disagree with me on that.
(Are you really that fat?)
They didn't DESERVE the flagrant call. Moreover, my point was that too many people on these boards blame the refs for costing them a game when the truth is the TEAM they BET ON played poorly.
0
I don't think I'm a fucking moron, but some may disagree with me on that.
(Are you really that fat?)
They didn't DESERVE the flagrant call. Moreover, my point was that too many people on these boards blame the refs for costing them a game when the truth is the TEAM they BET ON played poorly.
I don't think I'm a fucking moron, but some may disagree with me on that.
(Are you really that fat?)
They didn't DESERVE the flagrant call. Moreover, my point was that too many people on these boards blame the refs for costing them a game when the truth is the TEAM they BET ON played poorly.
Dumbass...it is not about deserving it. And yes, Marquette was outplayed. No question about it...but it is a rule and should've been called. A lot less has been called a flagrant 1 this year.
0
Quote Originally Posted by poltergasm:
I don't think I'm a fucking moron, but some may disagree with me on that.
(Are you really that fat?)
They didn't DESERVE the flagrant call. Moreover, my point was that too many people on these boards blame the refs for costing them a game when the truth is the TEAM they BET ON played poorly.
Dumbass...it is not about deserving it. And yes, Marquette was outplayed. No question about it...but it is a rule and should've been called. A lot less has been called a flagrant 1 this year.
i know refs didnt cost me marquette bet altho if they made the correct call we still woulda had life in game with chance to cut it to 1 possession game rather than 8 pt game. But yes marquette sucked
0
i know refs didnt cost me marquette bet altho if they made the correct call we still woulda had life in game with chance to cut it to 1 possession game rather than 8 pt game. But yes marquette sucked
do you people realize florida was still getting their 2 free throws even if they did call it a flagrant 1? they called a foul on marquette after that which still would have stood. so at best it would have been a wash on the free throws and they would have only gained a point if they only made 1 of 2..getting the ball after is a non issue because they would have after floridas free throws anyway.. certainly not a difference maker by any means
0
do you people realize florida was still getting their 2 free throws even if they did call it a flagrant 1? they called a foul on marquette after that which still would have stood. so at best it would have been a wash on the free throws and they would have only gained a point if they only made 1 of 2..getting the ball after is a non issue because they would have after floridas free throws anyway.. certainly not a difference maker by any means
Yea, I'm not arguing that it was a violation according to the current rules--- letter of the law and all that,,, but like I said to begin with, thank God they didn't call it,,
Maybe this and others will bring attention to what a womens leauge rule this is,, probably not,,,, Acually in hindsight, it probably would have done more good if they wouldv'e fucked up the whole ending with a that call and robbed FLA,, that may have brought more attention to it. and get it reviewed and dumped.
I didn't have JDS on this game, so I apologize for pissing on this threads intent,, GL going forward...
0
Yea, I'm not arguing that it was a violation according to the current rules--- letter of the law and all that,,, but like I said to begin with, thank God they didn't call it,,
Maybe this and others will bring attention to what a womens leauge rule this is,, probably not,,,, Acually in hindsight, it probably would have done more good if they wouldv'e fucked up the whole ending with a that call and robbed FLA,, that may have brought more attention to it. and get it reviewed and dumped.
I didn't have JDS on this game, so I apologize for pissing on this threads intent,, GL going forward...
do you people realize florida was still getting their 2 free throws even if they did call it a flagrant 1? they called a foul on marquette after that which still would have stood. so at best it would have been a wash on the free throws and they would have only gained a point if they only made 1 of 2..getting the ball after is a non issue because they would have after floridas free throws anyway.. certainly not a difference maker by any means
You know what, that's a good point, and I feel pretty stupid for ignoring it.. Although my question would be this,,, if they are reviewing this (or let's say a similar play in the future) and the elbow makes contact first, then the foul is called on the defense, can (or does) the second foul get nulified after the turn back time replay is reviewed?
0
Quote Originally Posted by badlands:
do you people realize florida was still getting their 2 free throws even if they did call it a flagrant 1? they called a foul on marquette after that which still would have stood. so at best it would have been a wash on the free throws and they would have only gained a point if they only made 1 of 2..getting the ball after is a non issue because they would have after floridas free throws anyway.. certainly not a difference maker by any means
You know what, that's a good point, and I feel pretty stupid for ignoring it.. Although my question would be this,,, if they are reviewing this (or let's say a similar play in the future) and the elbow makes contact first, then the foul is called on the defense, can (or does) the second foul get nulified after the turn back time replay is reviewed?
You know what, that's a good point, and I feel pretty stupid for ignoring it.. Although my question would be this,,, if they are reviewing this (or let's say a similar play in the future) and the elbow makes contact first, then the foul is called on the defense, can (or does) the second foul get nulified after the turn back time replay is reviewed?
nope i saw it happen this year and was cracking up because i asked myself the same thing...so they fuck up and miss a call yet another guy gets a foul after. this whole rule is beyond retarded. i guess its to prevent concussions ..ya because so many bball playes are getting concussions
0
Quote Originally Posted by iceman67:
You know what, that's a good point, and I feel pretty stupid for ignoring it.. Although my question would be this,,, if they are reviewing this (or let's say a similar play in the future) and the elbow makes contact first, then the foul is called on the defense, can (or does) the second foul get nulified after the turn back time replay is reviewed?
nope i saw it happen this year and was cracking up because i asked myself the same thing...so they fuck up and miss a call yet another guy gets a foul after. this whole rule is beyond retarded. i guess its to prevent concussions ..ya because so many bball playes are getting concussions
Stop complaining. You shouldn't have bet on Marquette in the first place. You lost because you bet on an overrated team without doing your research, not because the refs didn't call a flagrant.
Doesn't matter who anyone bet on dude. A flagrant foul is a flagrant foul. That was a flagrant foul. And, the officiating was one-sided the entire game. I even remarked to my friends at the bar during the first half when Crowder got that ridiculous 2nd foul, which was a touch foul AT BEST. Either these guys were on the take, or they were just that fucking incompetent. Was Donaghy the alternate in this game?
0
Quote Originally Posted by poltergasm:
Stop complaining. You shouldn't have bet on Marquette in the first place. You lost because you bet on an overrated team without doing your research, not because the refs didn't call a flagrant.
Doesn't matter who anyone bet on dude. A flagrant foul is a flagrant foul. That was a flagrant foul. And, the officiating was one-sided the entire game. I even remarked to my friends at the bar during the first half when Crowder got that ridiculous 2nd foul, which was a touch foul AT BEST. Either these guys were on the take, or they were just that fucking incompetent. Was Donaghy the alternate in this game?
stupidest thread i have ever seen. you guys obviously make wrong call and are hanging on to this non-disputed call like it cost you your bet. Who ever took marquette was on the wrong side. Get over it. That wasn't an obvious call at all. You conspiracy pieces of shit make me sick.
The non-call was incorrect. A Flagrant 1 is a Flagrant 1. That was a Flagrant 1. Period.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dustyent:
stupidest thread i have ever seen. you guys obviously make wrong call and are hanging on to this non-disputed call like it cost you your bet. Who ever took marquette was on the wrong side. Get over it. That wasn't an obvious call at all. You conspiracy pieces of shit make me sick.
The non-call was incorrect. A Flagrant 1 is a Flagrant 1. That was a Flagrant 1. Period.
ted valentine is always involved in this shady shit
you got it exactly right smac. I grew up with Teddy and that sumbitch is as crooked as hell. BTW, he was the only black kid in the neighborhood. He was a high school baseball coach and phys ed teacher around these parts and rumors were flying that he was doing some of the female softball players. He took off about 6 months later. Believe what you want but this guy is a slime.
How about him slapping JT3 on the ass the other day. He should have been suspended for that shit alone.
0
Quote Originally Posted by smac38:
ted valentine is always involved in this shady shit
you got it exactly right smac. I grew up with Teddy and that sumbitch is as crooked as hell. BTW, he was the only black kid in the neighborhood. He was a high school baseball coach and phys ed teacher around these parts and rumors were flying that he was doing some of the female softball players. He took off about 6 months later. Believe what you want but this guy is a slime.
How about him slapping JT3 on the ass the other day. He should have been suspended for that shit alone.
nope i saw it happen this year and was cracking up because i asked myself the same thing...so they fuck up and miss a call yet another guy gets a foul after. this whole rule is beyond retarded. i guess its to prevent concussions ..ya because so many bball playes are getting concussions
you're right, that is what the thread is about- this being a stupid rule and being called incorrectly and inconsistently. trading free throws wouldn't have done much for MU.
0
Quote Originally Posted by badlands:
nope i saw it happen this year and was cracking up because i asked myself the same thing...so they fuck up and miss a call yet another guy gets a foul after. this whole rule is beyond retarded. i guess its to prevent concussions ..ya because so many bball playes are getting concussions
you're right, that is what the thread is about- this being a stupid rule and being called incorrectly and inconsistently. trading free throws wouldn't have done much for MU.
you got it exactly right smac. I grew up with Teddy and that sumbitch is as crooked as hell. BTW, he was the only black kid in the neighborhood. He was a high school baseball coach and phys ed teacher around these parts and rumors were flying that he was doing some of the female softball players. He took off about 6 months later. Believe what you want but this guy is a slime.
How about him slapping JT3 on the ass the other day. He should have been suspended for that shit alone.
Yeah he slapped JT3 on the ass and then fcked him in the ass on some of the calls in that game. They took their best player out with fouls.
0
Quote Originally Posted by victornewman:
you got it exactly right smac. I grew up with Teddy and that sumbitch is as crooked as hell. BTW, he was the only black kid in the neighborhood. He was a high school baseball coach and phys ed teacher around these parts and rumors were flying that he was doing some of the female softball players. He took off about 6 months later. Believe what you want but this guy is a slime.
How about him slapping JT3 on the ass the other day. He should have been suspended for that shit alone.
Yeah he slapped JT3 on the ass and then fcked him in the ass on some of the calls in that game. They took their best player out with fouls.
Copyright � 1995 - 2024
CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.