Northeastern wasn't a home dog
Northeastern wasn't a home dog
Northeastern wasn't a home dog
This is a very profitable strategy - I don't think if you follow this to a certain extent you'll come up more than down. I personally disregard the home team being an underdog as that narrows down the field tremendously and has still been hitting at a very high clip. Like many people have stated in this thread though there are certain teams you just cannot bet on like the serious bottom feeders like Central Conn.
This is a very profitable strategy - I don't think if you follow this to a certain extent you'll come up more than down. I personally disregard the home team being an underdog as that narrows down the field tremendously and has still been hitting at a very high clip. Like many people have stated in this thread though there are certain teams you just cannot bet on like the serious bottom feeders like Central Conn.
This is a very profitable strategy - I don't think if you follow this to a certain extent you'll come up more than down. I personally disregard the home team being an underdog as that narrows down the field tremendously and has still been hitting at a very high clip. Like many people have stated in this thread though there are certain teams you just cannot bet on like the serious bottom feeders like Central Conn.
This is a very profitable strategy - I don't think if you follow this to a certain extent you'll come up more than down. I personally disregard the home team being an underdog as that narrows down the field tremendously and has still been hitting at a very high clip. Like many people have stated in this thread though there are certain teams you just cannot bet on like the serious bottom feeders like Central Conn.
Didn't the Northeastern game fit as well? RLM. More bets on Drexel. Line still went up a point on NE. Line ended -8.5 and NE won by 30+.... I do believe in this system with other variables like shooting percentage etc....
Sweat...those were just the three that I followed last night...still doing my dd on this...i always play home team in college bball and I prefer the dog....looks like a good system here...lets all just keep sharing our games so we can all share in the cha ching
Didn't the Northeastern game fit as well? RLM. More bets on Drexel. Line still went up a point on NE. Line ended -8.5 and NE won by 30+.... I do believe in this system with other variables like shooting percentage etc....
Sweat...those were just the three that I followed last night...still doing my dd on this...i always play home team in college bball and I prefer the dog....looks like a good system here...lets all just keep sharing our games so we can all share in the cha ching
Brown loosely fits.. No movement is technically rlm, all depends how tight your range is if you'd play it or not.
Rider andsSiena also fit, but have done zero research on any of these teams.
Brown loosely fits.. No movement is technically rlm, all depends how tight your range is if you'd play it or not.
Rider andsSiena also fit, but have done zero research on any of these teams.
Possible plays
Providence - Home Dog - Most of the money on Nova - Line went down
Boston College - Home Dog - Most of the money on VT- Line went down.
Possible plays
Providence - Home Dog - Most of the money on Nova - Line went down
Boston College - Home Dog - Most of the money on VT- Line went down.
Lines going wrong direction.... no?
Lines going wrong direction.... no?
Played Wright State last night!! It definitely fit.
Anyone else Iike me? I am not a fan of the Saturday slate....just too many games to look at. I prefer the mid week games where you can find one or two solid games to hone in on and research.
Early games I'm seeing are Providence, BC, Oakland, Arkansas...
See home many I can track and research today.
GL all! If anyone finds a good one post it up?
Played Wright State last night!! It definitely fit.
Anyone else Iike me? I am not a fan of the Saturday slate....just too many games to look at. I prefer the mid week games where you can find one or two solid games to hone in on and research.
Early games I'm seeing are Providence, BC, Oakland, Arkansas...
See home many I can track and research today.
GL all! If anyone finds a good one post it up?
Im still learning this system but are lines in BC and Providence games going the wrong direction...sorry for repetitive question?
Im still learning this system but are lines in BC and Providence games going the wrong direction...sorry for repetitive question?
you are questioning the system because if the betting trends you say are accurate this is the precise opposite of RLM
you are questioning the system because if the betting trends you say are accurate this is the precise opposite of RLM
On Boston College. The line opened at Vt -4.5. All of the money is coming in on VT which normally would make the line increase. But the line has decreased to -3.5. So that is the line movement you want when using this system.
On Boston College. The line opened at Vt -4.5. All of the money is coming in on VT which normally would make the line increase. But the line has decreased to -3.5. So that is the line movement you want when using this system.
Providence- Home DOG +1.5
Detroit U -2
Texas- Home DOG +1
Penn +1, line stays steady despite 91% on TempleBC +3.5. Opened 4.5 and 73% on VT
Like Providence a bit but need to look at the game some more - generally don't think Nova is nearly as tough on the road this year as at home. Line has swung back to +2 where it opened, though.
Detroit - regular line movement. Heavy public team.
Texas - pretty evenly bet game. 40-50% on either side depending on where you're looking.
Penn - maybe a fit but hard to tell. Don't like the swing back to Temple (now -1.5) after Penn moved briefly to a PK.
Providence- Home DOG +1.5
Detroit U -2
Texas- Home DOG +1
Penn +1, line stays steady despite 91% on TempleBC +3.5. Opened 4.5 and 73% on VT
Like Providence a bit but need to look at the game some more - generally don't think Nova is nearly as tough on the road this year as at home. Line has swung back to +2 where it opened, though.
Detroit - regular line movement. Heavy public team.
Texas - pretty evenly bet game. 40-50% on either side depending on where you're looking.
Penn - maybe a fit but hard to tell. Don't like the swing back to Temple (now -1.5) after Penn moved briefly to a PK.
BC might fit (and I don't know where Red stands on this), but the one piece for that game that gives me pause is the 67% of tickets on BC money line. I generally prefer to see lopsided action on both the spread and the ML.
I do like that the line opened shaded to the dog (relative to KenPom), which I typically view as inviting money on the favorite.
BOL
BC might fit (and I don't know where Red stands on this), but the one piece for that game that gives me pause is the 67% of tickets on BC money line. I generally prefer to see lopsided action on both the spread and the ML.
I do like that the line opened shaded to the dog (relative to KenPom), which I typically view as inviting money on the favorite.
BOL
Ok...thank you for that explanation! I'm still learningthe system....
Ok...thank you for that explanation! I'm still learningthe system....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.