All Forums | College Basketball

*******Two Systems: Kenpom & Another*******

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 48737
Posts: 303
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #51

Overall

System A (Kenpom): 35-30, +2.0 units

System B: 8-3-1, +4.7 units

 

Will have a System B play on Penn St today, just hoping to get a better line...sleep2

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #52

an_popcornan_popcornan_popcornan_popcornan_popcornan_popcornan_popcorn

 

Sunday

 

System A:

No Plays

 

System B:

Penn St +2.5 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

 

GL an_horse

The Bandit

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #53

an_lighteningan_lighteningan_lighteningan_lighteningan_lighteningan_lighteningan_lightening

 

Overall

System A (Kenpom): 35-30, +2.0 units

System B: 8-4-1, +3.6 units

 

Monday

System A:

Savannah St +11.5 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

Florida A&M +7 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

E. Washington +8 (-110), 1.1 to win 1 

 

System B:

No Plays

 

GL an_horse

The Bandit

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #54

an_violinan_violinan_violinan_violinan_violinan_violinan_violin

 

Overall

System A (Kenpom): 36-32, +0.8 units

System B: 8-4-1, +3.6 units

 

System A:

No Plays

 

System B:

Baylor +2.5 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

Villanova -6.5 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

 

GL an_horse

The Bandit

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #55

System B play on Ole Miss +3 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

 

Will have more plays and update record later today sleep2

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #56

an_bouncean_bouncean_bouncean_bouncean_bouncean_bouncean_bounce

 

Overall

System A (Kenpom): 36-32, +0.8 units

System B: 9-5-1, +3.5 units

 

System A:

UMBC (Maryland-Balt) +6 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

Navy +9 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

Army +6.5 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

Fordham +8 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #57

System B:

Ole Miss +3 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

Temple +1.5 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

Creighton -3 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

 

GL an_horse

The Bandit

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2019
Posts: 7
Posted: #58

I try to use Kenpom site for picking games. Forgive my ignorance what exactly is the "kenpom system"?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #59

There was a user on here quite a few years ago that shared a system using Kenpom ratings. Over the years there have been different variants of this system introduced with new parameters. It likes to take advantage of small time schools getting large lines for home court “advantage”  peace_5

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #60

6-1 last night...full update later, wanted to get these out there as I think some of the lines may change an_lightening

 

System A:

Rice +7, Oral Roberts +9.5, Charlotte +8, Milwaukee +8, Cleveland St +8.5, UNC Asheville +15, Youngstown St +9.5, Western Illinois +7.5, Western Carolina +12.5

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #61

“System” B looking at Illinois and NC Wilmington, but nothing locked in

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2017
Posts: 10582
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by Bandit7:

There was a user on here quite a few years ago that shared a system using Kenpom ratings. Over the years there have been different variants of this system introduced with new parameters. It likes to take advantage of small time schools getting large lines for home court “advantage”  peace_5


I believe you are referring to kine professor's system?

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/POST01/showmessage.aspx?spt=40&sub=101275364
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2018
Posts: 5
Posted: #63

I also bought the subscription to kenpom, I mostly look at offensive efficiency, defensive eff., experience, 3point shooting, and also starting 5 and bench. What do you look at in designing your system.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2018
Posts: 5
Posted: #64

Which system is more profitable for you A or B ?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #65

Quote Originally Posted by betthespread79:

Which system is more profitable for you A or B ?
I can’t give a definitive answer b/c I don’t have the data, and I’m too lazy to go back and add up all the tickets. However, my guess would be “B” and tbh I prefer B as it’s more selective, gives me room to operate within the guidelines (it’s not an exact “system” per se, and I use the term system loosely for B), and generally plays higher profile games (read: more exciting to watch).

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #66

My intent with posting is to track the progress of both so that I can give a more definitive answer  peace_5

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #67

Quote Originally Posted by OlDirtyBaztid:

Quote Originally Posted by Bandit7:

There was a user on here quite a few years ago that shared a system using Kenpom ratings. Over the years there have been different variants of this system introduced with new parameters. It likes to take advantage of small time schools getting large lines for home court “advantage”  
I believe you are referring to kine professor's system?https://www.covers.com/postingforum/POST01/showmessage.aspx?spt=40&sub=101275364
That's the one peace_5 thanks for digging it up. Lots of good information in there. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #68

clovercloverclovercloverclovercloverclover

 

Overall

System A (Kenpom): 40-32, +4.8 units

System B: 11-6-1, +4.4 units

 

All bets to win 1 unit @ -110

 

System A: 

Rice +7

Oral Roberts +9.5

Charlotte +8

Milwaukee +8

Cleveland St +8.5

UNC Asheville +15

Youngstown St +9.5

Western Illinois +7.5

Western Carolina +12.5

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #69

System B:

Illinois +9 

 

GL an_horse

The Bandit

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2019
Posts: 276
Posted: #70
What or who is system B?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #71

an_violinan_violinan_violinan_violinan_violinan_violinan_violin

 

Overall

System A (Kenpom): 44-37, +3.3 units

System B: 11-7-1, +3.3 units

 

System A:

No Plays

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #72

System B:

Maryland -5 (-110), 1.1 to win 1

 

GL an_horse

The Bandit

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #73

Quote Originally Posted by LosDos:

What or who is system B?
It is my own. I start by looking at ranked teams on the road catching low lines and go from there peace_5

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 14153
Posted: #74
I was going to say, isnt maryland a system B? Bol.
buy $BTC
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 1246
Posted: #75

Quote Originally Posted by Eddy_Winslow:

I was going to say, isnt maryland a system B? Bol.
an_light Thanks, Eddy peace_5 GL 

 

an_horse

All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.