All Forums | College Basketball

Univ. of Pacific @ UCLA -- game discussion and analysis

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5233
Posts: 74
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 189
Posted: #51
Hey kapono I'm new to the forums but really can see the respect your thread generates. I like the idea of someone focusing in on one team instead of trying to weed through a list of 70 games. Pacific has moved to +8 at my book, and I'm gonna join in. Thanks for your analysis!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 1137
Posted: #52

Quote Originally Posted by kogepan:

Line moved to 8.5! 

 

Saw that coming! Kap your boys roll tonight.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2927
Posted: #53
Pacific +8 locked in.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54676
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Think this gets to 8.5 Kap? UCLA name alone should drive the late nite chasers to taking the Bruins....

Also like the under..... kinda see a 59-56 game...

At 8.5 and rising.....

You may have to triple dip Kap

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 3822
Posted: #55
i just pounded pacific!!  watch the line drop now!! hehe. good stuff kap!!!
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 11688
Posted: #56

Will the "Real Kapono" please stand up

How many Kaponoforinsert number are there? haha

GL

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 225
Posted: #57
Any chance that it hits double digets by tip??  Still have 55 minutes!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54676
Posted: #58
Whats the best line you've seen? I got 8.5 online and hoping it gets pushed.....  will wait to call the local til last minute....he always shades the fav.....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 161
Posted: #59

Got UCLA -5.5

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 491
Posted: #60
Wow +9 now boys 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2513
Posted: #61
were are gonna need a flat 2nd half from the bruins...
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 35430
Posted: #62
Let's just get these out of the way now...:

1. UCLA Bruins (TT) UNDER 71 (-110), 3.3 to win 3
2. Pacific Tigers +7 (-102), 4.08 to win 4
3. Pacific Tigers ML +265, 1.5 to win 3.975 unit
4. Pacific Tigers +7.5 (-102), 2.04 to win 2
5. Pacific Tigers ML+280, 1 to win 2.80

When you expect them to come out and run teams, they play extremely poor. When they are on a B2B, shorthanded, against a team that is custom built to give you problems, they shoot 55% from the floor hitting midrange jumpers in transition and shoot 5-10 from the three point line.

Sometimes I sit and wonder why I even put all the effort into trying to break down a game/analyze a spot or position only to have the exact opposite of what statistically and analytically should occur.

Either way, apologies to anyone who read this thread and took Pacific. I think everything lined up for them to be the right side... but I guess this is what happens sometimes when everything does seem to point in one direction.

Who knows, maybe we get a 41-24 2H where Pacific comes back to win by 1 after deciding to go zone every possession and hope UCLA cools off from deep.... looking highly unlikely but a guy can dream
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 560
Posted: #63
dont worry bout it Kapono...Who u like 2nd half? ucla-2?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 35430
Posted: #64
King -- no idea, books like Pacific to come back seeing as the line is only +2 for Pacific, that gives me some hope
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 41623
Posted: #65
ucla fucked me with that 3 to end the first half what a fucking moose lucky shooting
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 544
Posted: #66
Hey man, nothing in gambling is pre-determined (well almost nothing). I think it was sound analysis and a good play. So much so in fact that I decided to buy Pacific 2nd half (sorry to rub it in)...don't throwout your analysis just because the results arent showing up for you early.


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 41623
Posted: #67
of course UCLA cant score for the life of them in the second half now
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 491
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by TrustTheNumbers:

Hey man, nothing in gambling is pre-determined (well almost nothing). I think it was sound analysis and a good play. So much so in fact that I decided to buy Pacific 2nd half (sorry to rub it in)...don't throwout your analysis just because the results arent showing up for you early.



Agreed. Great analysis, very appreciated. Lets hang in there. One team is still trying.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 41623
Posted: #69
29 pts in the second half why the fuck could they not do that in the first half
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 35430
Posted: #70
Pacific going 3-21 from three... god, just a brutal beat. If they hit just a couple of those they likely cover. Those were some WIDE OPEN threes too.


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 35430
Posted: #71
3-22 from three now... pathetic
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 12309
Posted: #72
Man, this was some sorry ass basketball.  I hope this shit gets better.  Even just watching this shit makes me want to turn off the T.V. this game was so boring.  Man is it me or is there less talent in NCAA this year?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 35777
Posted: #73

Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:

Let's just get these out of the way now...:

1. UCLA Bruins (TT) UNDER 71 (-110), 3.3 to win 3
2. Pacific Tigers +7 (-102), 4.08 to win 4
3. Pacific Tigers ML +265, 1.5 to win 3.975 unit
4. Pacific Tigers +7.5 (-102), 2.04 to win 2
5. Pacific Tigers ML+280, 1 to win 2.80

When you expect them to come out and run teams, they play extremely poor. When they are on a B2B, shorthanded, against a team that is custom built to give you problems, they shoot 55% from the floor hitting midrange jumpers in transition and shoot 5-10 from the three point line.

Sometimes I sit and wonder why I even put all the effort into trying to break down a game/analyze a spot or position only to have the exact opposite of what statistically and analytically should occur.

Either way, apologies to anyone who read this thread and took Pacific. I think everything lined up for them to be the right side... but I guess this is what happens sometimes when everything does seem to point in one direction.

Who knows, maybe we get a 41-24 2H where Pacific comes back to win by 1 after deciding to go zone every possession and hope UCLA cools off from deep.... looking highly unlikely but a guy can dream

Kap don't get discouraged.  You were right on with you analysis unfortunately for all Pacific backers you could not hit those threes yourself.  Remember this is a grind and don't let it get the best of you.  I always have and will look to your analysis of the Pac-10 and in particular UCLA before I place my bet.  If your analysis is completely opposite of mine I pass.  In this case I didn't play simply because of the late line movement and didn't know why.  You are certainly an asset and keep your head up.  BOL!

 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 10072
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by PLAYAAAA1969:

Was looking to Fade UCLA after last nights game,,until I saw Pacific next....In all my yrs of sports betting,, Pacific is my kryptonite..I have NEVER EVER won a bet in 20 yrs on or against Pacific...

I will save you all the trouble of capping as I am 100% on Pacific games......

PACIFIC

Sry guys ,,but I said I'm 100% wrong on Pacific games....

All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.