The basis is simple. If there is a "large" difference between the
opening line and the fanmatch line on kenpom.com, I will side with
Vegas.
System rules:
If the opening line is between 0 and 4, a large difference is 2.5 4.5 to 8, a large difference is 3 points. 8.5 to 12, a large difference is 3.5 points. 12.5 to 15.5, a large difference is 4 points. 16 and up, a large difference is 5 points.
Three notes:
I
will not be wagering on the Dogs that have over 50% of the bets
according to covers contests.
I will not be wagering on the Favorites that have over 60% of the bets according to covers contests.
All plays will be 1st halfs
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
The basis is simple. If there is a "large" difference between the
opening line and the fanmatch line on kenpom.com, I will side with
Vegas.
System rules:
If the opening line is between 0 and 4, a large difference is 2.5 4.5 to 8, a large difference is 3 points. 8.5 to 12, a large difference is 3.5 points. 12.5 to 15.5, a large difference is 4 points. 16 and up, a large difference is 5 points.
Three notes:
I
will not be wagering on the Dogs that have over 50% of the bets
according to covers contests.
I will not be wagering on the Favorites that have over 60% of the bets according to covers contests.
If the line is between 0 and 4, a large difference is 2 points. 4.5 to 12, a large difference is 3 points. 12.5 to 16, a large difference is 4 points. 16.5 and up, a large difference is 5 points.
0
The first post should have these rules:
If the line is between 0 and 4, a large difference is 2 points. 4.5 to 12, a large difference is 3 points. 12.5 to 16, a large difference is 4 points. 16.5 and up, a large difference is 5 points.
Thanks for posting this! Im new and have found it tuff to find information that makes sence.
Quote Originally Posted by beaverfan23:
The basis is simple. If there is a "large" difference between the opening line and the fanmatch line on kenpom.com, I will side with Vegas.
System rules:
If the opening line is between 0 and 4, a large difference is 2.5 4.5 to 8, a large difference is 3 points. 8.5 to 12, a large difference is 3.5 points. 12.5 to 15.5, a large difference is 4 points. 16 and up, a large difference is 5 points.
Three notes:
I will not be wagering on the Dogs that have over 50% of the bets according to covers contests.
I will not be wagering on the Favorites that have over 60% of the bets according to covers contests.
All plays will be 1st halfs
0
Thanks for posting this! Im new and have found it tuff to find information that makes sence.
Quote Originally Posted by beaverfan23:
The basis is simple. If there is a "large" difference between the opening line and the fanmatch line on kenpom.com, I will side with Vegas.
System rules:
If the opening line is between 0 and 4, a large difference is 2.5 4.5 to 8, a large difference is 3 points. 8.5 to 12, a large difference is 3.5 points. 12.5 to 15.5, a large difference is 4 points. 16 and up, a large difference is 5 points.
Three notes:
I will not be wagering on the Dogs that have over 50% of the bets according to covers contests.
I will not be wagering on the Favorites that have over 60% of the bets according to covers contests.
7:00 Morehead St (HDT) +1.5 Detroit (HFT) waiting on line FSU (HDT) +3 7:30 Marshall (NDT) +2.5 -105 8:00 UMKC (RDA) +2 -115 8:30 Utah (HDA) +3 -115 9:00 Temple (RFA) -1.5 LaSalle (NFT) -5.5 (-115) 10:00 UC Davis (HFA) -2 -105
i signed up for kempom there no explaintion on how to read his stuff on fan match and what teams to bet you are going against him on line moves any insite would be helpfull ty
0
Quote Originally Posted by beaverfan23:
Official Wednesday Plays
7:00 Morehead St (HDT) +1.5 Detroit (HFT) waiting on line FSU (HDT) +3 7:30 Marshall (NDT) +2.5 -105 8:00 UMKC (RDA) +2 -115 8:30 Utah (HDA) +3 -115 9:00 Temple (RFA) -1.5 LaSalle (NFT) -5.5 (-115) 10:00 UC Davis (HFA) -2 -105
i signed up for kempom there no explaintion on how to read his stuff on fan match and what teams to bet you are going against him on line moves any insite would be helpfull ty
i signed up for kempom there no explaintion on how to read his stuff on fan match and what teams to bet you are going against him on line moves any insite would be helpfull ty
Kenpoms information is seemingly endless and very helpful...just look through his site for a while and you will figure things out.
As for this system, it is based on the theory that humans can pick winners better than computers because of emotion, injuries, etc. With that being said, we side with the humans who make the opening lines instead of Kenpoms system whenever there is a large difference between the two.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jay1234:
i signed up for kempom there no explaintion on how to read his stuff on fan match and what teams to bet you are going against him on line moves any insite would be helpfull ty
Kenpoms information is seemingly endless and very helpful...just look through his site for a while and you will figure things out.
As for this system, it is based on the theory that humans can pick winners better than computers because of emotion, injuries, etc. With that being said, we side with the humans who make the opening lines instead of Kenpoms system whenever there is a large difference between the two.
Tenn Tech is the only play I see. The URI line must have changed on Kenpom. Providence's leading scorer is a gametime decision so I wouldn't want to touch that one.
0
Tenn Tech is the only play I see. The URI line must have changed on Kenpom. Providence's leading scorer is a gametime decision so I wouldn't want to touch that one.
Noticing a trend...maybe we need to do dogs 1H and favorites Full Game. Anybody want to back track? :)
Beaver, I followed this system devoutly last year. I noticed that the dogs, especially the big dogs (double digit) performed very well in the 1st half, only to get blown out in the 2nd half. Towsen St was notorious for this.
I started playing the bigger dogs (8+) 1st half only, and had much success with it.
So far this year, I've been playing faves and short dogs for the whole game and bigger dogs for 1st half. I haven't kept my figures, but I've been winning no doubt.
0
Quote Originally Posted by beaverfan23:
Noticing a trend...maybe we need to do dogs 1H and favorites Full Game. Anybody want to back track? :)
Beaver, I followed this system devoutly last year. I noticed that the dogs, especially the big dogs (double digit) performed very well in the 1st half, only to get blown out in the 2nd half. Towsen St was notorious for this.
I started playing the bigger dogs (8+) 1st half only, and had much success with it.
So far this year, I've been playing faves and short dogs for the whole game and bigger dogs for 1st half. I haven't kept my figures, but I've been winning no doubt.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.