For record keeping, here is what I played under the Kelly Criterion method. Not 100% matches, but for a Saturday it is close enough.
Purdue
St. Johns
Maryland
Southern Methodist
Oklahoma St.
Brown
Indiana St.
Rhode Island
Duke
Texas
Texas A&M
Texas Tech
Utah
The Citadel
Colorado
Marshall
Duquense
Tulsa
Louisianna Monroe
Pittsburgh
Cal St. Fullerton
Santa Clara
Northern Arizona
Montana St.
Oakland
IUPUI
San Diego St.
Texas Christian
For record keeping, here is what I played under the Kelly Criterion method. Not 100% matches, but for a Saturday it is close enough.
Purdue
St. Johns
Maryland
Southern Methodist
Oklahoma St.
Brown
Indiana St.
Rhode Island
Duke
Texas
Texas A&M
Texas Tech
Utah
The Citadel
Colorado
Marshall
Duquense
Tulsa
Louisianna Monroe
Pittsburgh
Cal St. Fullerton
Santa Clara
Northern Arizona
Montana St.
Oakland
IUPUI
San Diego St.
Texas Christian
I took off TCU opened for me at 4.5 and KP -2. No play for me. But these list are matching up to mine. And Beavers through the 8pm games.
I took off TCU opened for me at 4.5 and KP -2. No play for me. But these list are matching up to mine. And Beavers through the 8pm games.
I took off TCU opened for me at 4.5 and KP -2. No play for me. But these list are matching up to mine. And Beavers through the 8pm games.
Austin Peay opened at - 1 at betonline Kp has em - 2 .. No Play for me on E ILL .. I could be wrong but , check it out !!
I took off TCU opened for me at 4.5 and KP -2. No play for me. But these list are matching up to mine. And Beavers through the 8pm games.
Austin Peay opened at - 1 at betonline Kp has em - 2 .. No Play for me on E ILL .. I could be wrong but , check it out !!
Thanks for the reply. I am surprised the system uses such a limited amount of betting data. Those numbers are derived from
Covers "All Players" consensus shows the number of picks in the league cash contests made by all players. If the percentage of picks exceeds 59%, the game is highlighted.
That can't be a huge sample. For example if you use Sports Options they are giving you the % of all sportsbooks where you have tens of thousands of wagers going into the numbers rather than a few handfuls.
This whole proces could be taken to the next level and refined further, not that the current process isn't good. I think if you use a consensus of all bettors that will help and I wouldn't use Betonline's opening number I would use Pinnacles. It would be interesting to see how the number of plays would change and what the results might be.
Perhaps you could do a dual run, one which you have today vs what I prescribed above. See what matches up and use that as a super set of results.
Right now you are relying on one set of sampling and there should be another set to help further refine.
Just a thought.
Continued success.
jr
They come from the All NCAA Handicappers link off of the NCAAB page on Covers.com.
Thanks for the reply. I am surprised the system uses such a limited amount of betting data. Those numbers are derived from
Covers "All Players" consensus shows the number of picks in the league cash contests made by all players. If the percentage of picks exceeds 59%, the game is highlighted.
That can't be a huge sample. For example if you use Sports Options they are giving you the % of all sportsbooks where you have tens of thousands of wagers going into the numbers rather than a few handfuls.
This whole proces could be taken to the next level and refined further, not that the current process isn't good. I think if you use a consensus of all bettors that will help and I wouldn't use Betonline's opening number I would use Pinnacles. It would be interesting to see how the number of plays would change and what the results might be.
Perhaps you could do a dual run, one which you have today vs what I prescribed above. See what matches up and use that as a super set of results.
Right now you are relying on one set of sampling and there should be another set to help further refine.
Just a thought.
Continued success.
jr
They come from the All NCAA Handicappers link off of the NCAAB page on Covers.com.
[IMG]https://img718.imageshack.us/img718/4605/76903008.jpg[/IMG]
Hopefully this shows up here, this is what sports options looks like. I mashed it together just for the Yale/Brown game. The books you see are the ones I put up that I monitor. There's a ton of other choices but I find these to be the best to follow.
[IMG]https://img718.imageshack.us/img718/4605/76903008.jpg[/IMG]
Hopefully this shows up here, this is what sports options looks like. I mashed it together just for the Yale/Brown game. The books you see are the ones I put up that I monitor. There's a ton of other choices but I find these to be the best to follow.
Indiana St is now +10 to +10.5 depending on where you wager. Unless some local fell asleep 13.5 is long gone.
Some good additional thoughts, this is what helps makes something great........ greater.
Indiana St is now +10 to +10.5 depending on where you wager. Unless some local fell asleep 13.5 is long gone.
Some good additional thoughts, this is what helps makes something great........ greater.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.