All Forums | College Basketball

Wednesday

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 22096
Posts: 80
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54727
Posted: #51

Quote Originally Posted by STLCards2914:

Well if you knew how to read you would see that about 4 mins into the game I said that the under didn't look good...and nobody gives a fuck what you think either pal.  So since this a forum where everyone can voice their opinion I can and will continue to do so.  Don't like what I have to say?  Tough shit

Been here 4 1/2 years and this is the shit you "contribute". What a fucktard.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6680
Posted: #52

Quote Originally Posted by STLCards2914:

Well if you knew how to read you would see that about 4 mins into the game I said that the under didn't look good...and nobody gives a fuck what you think either pal.  So since this a forum where everyone can voice their opinion I can and will continue to do so.  Don't like what I have to say?  Tough shit

 

Why didn't you say it BEFORE the game started? Even with only 4 mins into the game, the score was OBVIOUSLY in hugh favor for the over and you wonder why people would have a problem with that??

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 302
Posted: #53
Cause I have a job that doesn't allow me to sit on a sports forum all day.  Wish I did, but I don't.  So I put my opinion in when I find the time.  Obviously it was well on its way over.  I didn't touch the total either way.  I like to see what Stucky posts cause he is red hot this year.  So i take what he likes, match it with what I like, and go from there.  No one should have a problem with anything.  Im not costing them money.  They should careless what I have to say.  It effects them in no way whatsoever.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54727
Posted: #54

Quote Originally Posted by STLCards2914:

Cause I have a job that doesn't allow me to sit on a sports forum all day.  Wish I did, but I don't.  So I put my opinion in when I find the time.  Obviously it was well on its way over.  I didn't touch the total either way.  I like to see what Stucky posts cause he is red hot this year.  So i take what he likes, match it with what I like, and go from there.  No one should have a problem with anything.  Im not costing them money.  They should careless what I have to say.  It effects them in no way whatsoever.

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6680
Posted: #55

Quote Originally Posted by STLCards2914:

Cause I have a job that doesn't allow me to sit on a sports forum all day.  Wish I did, but I don't.  So I put my opinion in when I find the time.  Obviously it was well on its way over.  I didn't touch the total either way.  I like to see what Stucky posts cause he is red hot this year.  So i take what he likes, match it with what I like, and go from there.  No one should have a problem with anything.  Im not costing them money.  They should careless what I have to say.  It effects them in no way whatsoever.

That's exactly what's wrong. By your logic, I guess it's ok to you if someone bumps a losing thread, too since whoever does that isn't costing the poster "any money".

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 11432
Posted: #56
No way stuck loses both.....i got in here late,so i'm jumping on s fla +3(buying a point) and my own pick of N. ill +10
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 302
Posted: #57
No one is costing anyone money.  Its your choice to tail someone elses picks or do a little homework yourself.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2002
Posts: 56154
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by STLCards2914:

No one is costing anyone money.  Its your choice to tail someone elses picks or do a little homework yourself.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6680
Posted: #59
For the record, I didn't tail but you sound like you never lost a game before or just not "doing your homework" when you did.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 302
Posted: #60
Is it normal for the site/forum to have everything everyone says taken out of context?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54727
Posted: #61

Quote Originally Posted by STLCards2914:

Is it normal for the site/forum to have everything everyone says taken out of context?

Damn you're dumb boy. "Out of context" ? You wrote a paragraph about how a game that had already started. Its not like you wrote a book and I picked out a sentence. This has nothing to do with the pick or following anybody. Its about being an asshole, or coming off like one. Why dont you start you own thread an call it "The halftime genius"

Dont see whats so hard for you to grasp.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 21313
Posted: #62
0-2 night
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 52
Posted: #63
Gettem tomorrow Stuck
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 940
Posted: #64
 record speaks for yourself...BOL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1667
Posted: #65
no worries bud u cant always be fire..back at em tmrw!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 2179
Posted: #66
I am going to sleep
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 871
Posted: #67
Tuff day, stuck lose, troe goes agaist red hot denver and gets pwnd while self admitting that he cant keep rollin at a 70% clip, odds reads my soul and picks against the bruins and east wash puts up a whoppin 40 points, nropp had charlie town blow up in his face, and someone else lost, we obv bounce bak tho, plenty ammo left in the clip

Shake it off take a few days off? Lol fuck that i already knew it was finals week and bet last 2 days anyway, we comin for all that money to be able to go all in on the easiest teasers ive seen for nfl this weekend, lets do dissssssssssssssssssss
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33100
Posted: #68
Bounce back stuck
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33100
Posted: #69
Bounce back stuck
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 144
Posted: #70
cant win em all.  nice little run that was.  start a new one tomorrow!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6680
Posted: #71

Quote Originally Posted by Stuckey:

0-2 night

 

It happens to the best and you are one of them.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 17534
Posted: #72
Quote Originally Posted by STLCards2914:

It seems as though people have sensitive feelings when someone puts a little reality into the situation.  The guy can't pick them all right and if you just tail his picks without doing your own research then shame on you.  Im just saying that it was a possiblity that Cincy comes out with guys who are trying to prove then deserve more playing time and play good basketball.  Thats exactly what happened.  Yes they shot extremely well but Wright St started off so slow that they almost offset each other.  I think the second have will be a little role reversal with WSU getting back in the game due to tired legs of a short bench/foul trouble for the Cats. 


People offering well thought out arguments for the other side should be welcomed and people shouldn't have a problem with someone voicing an opposing and well thought out view on a game. However, I have a problem with what I underlined above and i think it's the biggest misconception i read on Covers. I am not a tailer but what is so wrong with somebody blindly tailing. If somebody told me over the course of a long sample size, that say Cincinnati covers 65% of their road games, that may be good enough for me to follow without any further research. So if a guy like Stucky, who has proven to be the cream of the crop here at Covers over the long haul, is hitting close to 65% and has a great track record, why is it so terrible if someone blindly tails him? Are you saying that if one doesn't tail him and does his own research, that he will hit at a better percentage than Stuckey?

Is it any different than following a stock broker with an incredible track record of recommending stocks over a long period of time? If you are comfortable with that broker and his track record and he says, "Buy XYZ shares, I've done my research and it's a winner," is it wrong to follow such advice without doing your own research?

I don't get it.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 871
Posted: #73
Good point game hunter, obv nothing wrong with blindly tailing someone batting right aroung .700 its just common sense, as
Long as u dont run outta bullets in the banana clip you should just squeeze the trigger and go ballistic, why even read a buncha shit everyday, the guys a winner its just what it is
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 3425
Posted: #74
I Can say that I've blindly tailed him for over 4 years without fail for ample amounts of cash. Probally for more money than Rodney actually wagers on his own picks which means nothing but I've done so with little to no write in most cases aside from the occasional question I migh ask from time to time or by reading the occasional question he answers from other people from time to time and I can absolutely answer without pause there is nothing wrong with tailing someone who has proven himself time and time again on here. Don't understand how anyone can even make an argument that there is something wrong with it! All the talk about do your own research and blah, blah, blah holds no water if the person you are tailing is far more advanced and superior at capping a certain sport than you are. I welcome his picks daily win or lose and when money is lost it's just important to know that you tailed somebody on your own. Nobody forced you to do so and it is not right to point fingers and place blame. If you don't agree with that THAN YA you should cap your own games for yourself....
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 3425
Posted: #75
And now that I think about it, I knew absolutely nothing about NCAAB until I started to tail him and ask him questions in 2006!! He actually taught me about Vegas rotation and explained why I can't bet on certain teams
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.