All Forums | College Football

ALL ABOARD the lindetrain - Week 5

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6027
Posts: 82
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 5367
Posted: #51
Ahhh, just added one...
 
Sam Houston State +28 (-115) - full unit
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 10
Posted: #52
Byu -5.5.They will win by at least 7. There is D is great against the run and except for the mental breakdown against Tulsa they are holding opponents to low scores and do a pretty good job scoring.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 10
Posted: #53
Byu -5.5.They will win by at least 7. There D is great against the run and except for the mental breakdown against Tulsa they are holding opponents to low scores and do a pretty good job scoring.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 10
Posted: #54
You really think South Carolina has value in this spot?  Coming off LSU game with a short week Kentucky on deck.  They lost best linebacker off of a defense giving up 4.9 yards per carry.  Also they are breaking in a new QB.  Also ranked teams coming off of first loss are at an emotional disadvantage as they are 2-9 ats in this spot. I think Miss State @ 14 has alot of value as they could easily touch 200 yards rushing in this game and will likely give South Carolina their best shot.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 5367
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by Stewy63501:

You really think South Carolina has value in this spot?  Coming off LSU game with a short week Kentucky on deck.  They lost best linebacker off of a defense giving up 4.9 yards per carry.  Also they are breaking in a new QB.  Also ranked teams coming off of first loss are at an emotional disadvantage as they are 2-9 ats in this spot. I think Miss State @ 14 has alot of value as they could easily touch 200 yards rushing in this game and will likely give South Carolina their best shot.

I think Mississippi State looks like the easy play in this game for sure...but this is not Auburn and I fully believe SC is in dire needs of a solid performance.  No looking past this one after getting whipped last week...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 3600
Posted: #56
SC didn't really get whipped. If spurrier had gone for a TD when he should've, it wouldn't been a one score game in the 4th.

Not to mention had the LSU trick play on the FG attempt failed, it could've been a one crazy ending.

Whats your opinion on your Cats this weekend?
Letdown spot against an FAU team that can put up points?
I can see woodson waking up the team late to pull out a squeaker.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 5367
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by ZonaCats:



Whats your opinion on your Cats this weekend?
Letdown spot against an FAU team that can put up points?
I can see woodson waking up the team late to pull out a squeaker.

Man all I can say is it's just really not smart to fade the Cats right now...they are clicking on all cylinders.  Typically I'm negative when it comes to UK sports in general - I have nothing negative to say about this team.  It's not like me, but I will come out and say I think we're better than South Carolina and Tennessee...I really think we're that good.  I don't think I've ever seen a team overcome 10-0, 20-7, and 29-21 deficits on the road in an SEC game before...

People are excited about this team, the players are feeling great about themselves, and I'm sure just getting out on the field and getting another chance to show how tough they are is great for them.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 5367
Posted: #58

To some extent, it reminds me of Oregon/Fresno a few weeks ago...everyone wanted to fade the Ducks off the big Michigan win, and I sorta saw the game as a homecoming where they got to show the home crowd how sick they were.

Sure enough they did, absolutely blasting Fresno.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 548
Posted: #59
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 4236
Posted: #60
The cards looking good. I'm also on Buffalo, Temple, & Illinois. Thinking about GT as well but just don't trust a Chan Gailey coached team. However it's about time for Bowden's boys to lose some games they should win and let the season spiral downhill. Southern Miss also looks tempting.
BOL this weekend linde
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 46593
Posted: #61
lindetrain,
 
very surprised to see you on South Carolina here...oh well, we can't agree on them all...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 134
Posted: #62
Love the Gamecock pick Linde.  Little bit of a Homer play here but I like some of the intangibles I'm reading in the local paper from Spurrier.  MSU playing better, public will lean on MSU hard after SC QB change and loss to LSU.  Sets up well for SC.  Homecoming for Cocks too. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 33
Posted: #63
is 2-14 ats

Here are the plays

Sep 6 1997 Syracuse -10½ @ Oklahoma Oklahoma 36-34 No cover
Nov 15 1997 Washington Pk @ U.C.L.A. U.C.L.A. 52-28 No cover
Sep 25 1999 Arizona State -1½ @ California California 24-23 No cover
Oct 30 1999 Michigan -17 @ Indiana Michigan 34-31 No cover
Sep 16 2000 Minnesota -8½ @ Baylor Minnesota 34-9 COVER
Sep 30 2000 Wyoming -3½ @ New Mexico New Mexico 45-10 No cover
Oct 14 2000 Bowling Green @ Miami-Ohio -15 Miami-Ohio 24-10 No cover
Oct 27 2001 Florida -19 vs. Georgia Florida 24-10 No cover
Sep 20 2003 North Carolina @ Wisconsin -14½ Wisconsin 38-27 No cover
Nov 6 2004 Clemson @ Miami-Florida -17 Clemson 24-17 No cover
Sep 17 2005 Miami-Ohio -6 @ Kent State Miami-Ohio 27-10 COVER
Oct 15 2005 U-A-B -5½ @ Marshall Marshall 20-19 No cover
Oct 29 2005 Akron @ Bowling Green -16½ Akron 24-14 No cover
Nov 5 2005 Northern Illinois -4 @ Central Michigan Northern Illinois 31-28 No cover
Nov 19 2005 Oklahoma @ Texas Tech -7½ Texas Tech 23-21 No cover
Dec 2 2006 Rutgers @ West Virginia -9½ West Virginia 41-39 No cover

This week you bet against Louisville and take NC State +9

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 5367
Posted: #64
Quote Originally Posted by pags11:

lindetrain,
 
very surprised to see you on South Carolina here...oh well, we can't agree on them all...

I admit it is definitely not my type of bet...

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 5108
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by Wizeguysports:

is 2-14 ats

Here are the plays

Sep 6 1997 Syracuse -10½ @ Oklahoma Oklahoma 36-34 No cover
Nov 15 1997 Washington Pk @ U.C.L.A. U.C.L.A. 52-28 No cover
Sep 25 1999 Arizona State -1½ @ California California 24-23 No cover
Oct 30 1999 Michigan -17 @ Indiana Michigan 34-31 No cover
Sep 16 2000 Minnesota -8½ @ Baylor Minnesota 34-9 COVER
Sep 30 2000 Wyoming -3½ @ New Mexico New Mexico 45-10 No cover
Oct 14 2000 Bowling Green @ Miami-Ohio -15 Miami-Ohio 24-10 No cover
Oct 27 2001 Florida -19 vs. Georgia Florida 24-10 No cover
Sep 20 2003 North Carolina @ Wisconsin -14½ Wisconsin 38-27 No cover
Nov 6 2004 Clemson @ Miami-Florida -17 Clemson 24-17 No cover
Sep 17 2005 Miami-Ohio -6 @ Kent State Miami-Ohio 27-10 COVER
Oct 15 2005 U-A-B -5½ @ Marshall Marshall 20-19 No cover
Oct 29 2005 Akron @ Bowling Green -16½ Akron 24-14 No cover
Nov 5 2005 Northern Illinois -4 @ Central Michigan Northern Illinois 31-28 No cover
Nov 19 2005 Oklahoma @ Texas Tech -7½ Texas Tech 23-21 No cover
Dec 2 2006 Rutgers @ West Virginia -9½ West Virginia 41-39 No cover

This week you bet against Louisville and take NC State +9



What is this a chart of, wizeguy? What trend is 2-14 ATS?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 3600
Posted: #66
i'm jumping aboard the lindetrain. i'll take a remy and an extra pillow.
what's on tap for entertainment? (besides the we're all going to win)
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 5367
Posted: #67
Removing:
 
Illinois +3
 
Really am not feeling this one at all anymore...given it some thought and I think Penn State gets on track.  I do believe there will be a time where Illinois has that season-defining win, but I don't think it's here...
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 5367
Posted: #68

Nevermind, I'm keeping them...

What the fuck am I doing?

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 5367
Posted: #69
Idaho +25 (-108)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 2724
Posted: #70

Linde,

Take a look at Eastern Michigan +21.5. Vandy doesn't deserve to be favored by three touchdowns to anyone. This is a good spot for Eastern Michigan and I would not be suprised to see an upset.......

 

good luck this week

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 33714
Posted: #71
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 7885
Posted: #72
linde what is your thoughts on the cal vs. oregon game??

im leaning towards cal right now...think they will keep it close
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 3628
Posted: #73
Linde,
 
I gave the Miss St. ML a hard look, and I came away thinking that SC minus the points is probably the better play.  I didn't take it, but without the QB play Miss St. is in trouble.  Nice play.
 
I still think UK wins but by less than 20.  Worried about dog play though.
 
GL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 3648
Posted: #74
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 7885
Posted: #75
anyone who is not riding the kentucky train is crazy...i will be riding them until they take my money, took em last week ML and the points and the week before..not jumping off until they give me a reason too

same with oklahoma
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.